DrunkMonkey Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I'm sad it never made it to 50... 50 would have made it all worth it, not that 47 is anything to be ashamed of, but it just doesn't have the same ring as 50. The good thing is we can all strive for 50 in the next global conflagration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brenann Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I'm sad it never made it to 50... 50 would have made it all worth it, not that 47 is anything to be ashamed of, but it just doesn't have the same ring as 50. The good thing is we can all strive for 50 in the next global conflagration. Is there enough nukes left atm to hit 50?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoindotnler Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Is there enough nukes left atm to hit 50?? Yes there is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I'd love to see the cap removed honestly. It would actually cause some drama since any huge nuclear war could effectively cripple the world. That would be awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 "Sorry. We got a little trigger happy."-Karma We weren't the only ones. Everyone knew this thing was going to be nuclear, and I can't think of anyone involved but TOP that really had a problem with that. Nukes are the only way to do meaningful damage to a large nation and everyone knows it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 if the cap was removed then the rate of negative effect would have to be dampened as well otherwise the next global war would just bill lock everyone and their promiscuous mothers. i think as people learn to build larger warchests and MP's, GW's will continue to break records. 3 months of constant intense nuclear war would be awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Do something about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Do something about it. Sorry. Always wanted to say that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I'm sad it never made it to 50... 50 would have made it all worth it, not that 47 is anything to be ashamed of, but it just doesn't have the same ring as 50. The good thing is we can all strive for 50 in the next global conflagration. 47 is obviously the best number for it to be at, and in fact is a sign of the future. THE PROPHECY HAS BEEN MADE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Sorry. Always wanted to say that. We're the new hegemony. We're allowed to say that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellAngel Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I'd love to see the cap removed honestly. It would actually cause some drama since any huge nuclear war could effectively cripple the world. If you play it through it wouldnt really change anything. Alliances with the highest warchests win, just like now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mixoux Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 We're the new hegemony. We're allowed to say that. And if you think otherwise, well good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anenu Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 I'd love to see the cap removed honestly. It would actually cause some drama since any huge nuclear war could effectively cripple the world. I agree with this. I also read a suggestion somewhere a while back that i think would be cool were color effects radiation significantly. Effectively their would be a worldwide radiation level that effects all colors but individual colors can have increased radiation depending on the number of nations on that color and the number of nations on that color being nuked, this essentially makes colors the equivalent of continents which they seem to be already to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Meanĕ Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 If you play it through it wouldnt really change anything. Alliances with the highest warchests win, just like now. But the effect of essentially putting nations into low if not negative populations would be fun to see play out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ty345 Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 We're the new hegemony. We're allowed to say that. I await some crazy to scream "I TOLD U SO!" at this comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Flech Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 Did you know that it effects my friggin environment and Bill's as well ??We're PO'd !! I'd like to give these hooligans a piece of my mind ! >:[ Agree. It's back down to below normal though. (XD) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gauner Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 We're the new hegemony. We're allowed to say that. I KNEW IT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime minister Johns Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 We're the new hegemony. We're allowed to say that. This one is going into the file. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.