Gerald Meanĕ

Don't make us merge into athens bro.

[quote name='lmcfalcon12' date='07 July 2010 - 12:22 AM' timestamp='1278458521' post='2361704'] Once again, entitled to my opinion. See here in America, we are allotted the right to free speech. Silly of me to suspect that this God given right would carry over to the Legion on the BBs. I'm sorry for being so stupid. [/quote] Unfortunately we aren't in america. Free speech doesn't carry over to privately owned areas like cn and so forth where the owners can get rid of you if they like for what you say.

[quote name='The Arbiter' date='07 July 2010 - 12:15 AM' timestamp='1278458108' post='2361688'] A personal insult? The 500 tech was for disobeying a BB gag and trolling in an improper manner. It was just so bad... [/quote] Why didn't you just kick him out then, as you pretty much ensured that happening with such a crazy punishment.

[quote name='Fernando12' date='27 May 2010 - 11:45 PM' timestamp='1275000306' post='2313946'] Gramlins is making this an entirely different war. CnG should not interfere if IRON allies wish to assist IRON in taking on the Gramlins upper tier. If CnG threatens any action the CnG is no better than those they replaced. Gramlins isn't going to come to peace anytime soon. IRON should be free to call on allies if they wish to take them on. IF, they feel it is worth the damages just to get this thing over with. [/quote] I wouldn't say this is a different war. I'd say the cb for the war has long since been rendered finished, and there aren't enough THIS IS MADNESS pictures on the internet for why it still goes on. Also who replaced who now?

So I'm assuming this is like the eve incident?

[quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 10:04 PM' timestamp='1273611829' post='2295142'] Well the mighty \m/ smacks around a nation that most people could build in a week with nukes. And bragging about it no less. Wow you all sure are impressive. How will I ever rebuild back to my former level? Well as much as you love watching me, why don't you start watching Gramlins? They have layed out a direct threat to yours and evey other alliance on Planet Bob by trying to set a precedent of uncconditional surrender. Why don't you show how big you are by doing something about it? I know your to big of cowards to raid them but, at least you could create a petition or something. It might be good to think about something other then me all day. Just how do you feel about Gramlins? [/quote] If you've got them use them I always say. Not to mention we've got to start building up that grl again so no one gets too complacent with it. As far as gramlins goes they're a threat to \m/ in the same way \m/ is a threat to them, which is to say none. Really the unconditional surrender thing only works against them ironically enough in the same way you ended up being attacked. It is very rare for the slighted to forget, and gramlins will have to keep itself from ever getting into a situation where it is on the losing side of a war since no one has forgotten what they did. All that needs to be done is wait for the right time.

To be honest I actually don't mind the idea of unconditional surrender in alliance wars if it is warranted. Gramlins case isn't really warrented, but in the case of the whole war at the start between top/ect vrs the people they attacked I could see unconditional surrender being used.

[quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 09:51 PM' timestamp='1273611070' post='2295115'] To be honest \m/ has no idea what they are doing. [/quote] Sure we do, we're watching some members of ours smack you around.

[quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 07:49 PM' timestamp='1273603780' post='2294910'] You know it has nothing to with me. [/quote] Keep telling yourself that. I'm just enjoying the spectacle really. Still pretty predictable though since the ending will still be the same with you having next to nothing nation wise, and not really accomplishing what you set out to do. With all the time you're spending on us instead of gramlins it isn't any wonder though why it'll turn out that way.

[quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 07:27 PM' timestamp='1273602424' post='2294881'] And yet another one surrenders. Left with nothing to say but, lol or lulz. Well there sure has been a great deal teeth nashing, anger and complaining by \m/ for some lulzs. For an alliance that seems to be obsessed with me, you should have known this was a bad idea. Soon however \m/ will crawl back under its rock and I will continue to deal with Gramlins. And in the end outside of handing people a gold mine of quotes that will be used against you later nothing will have changed. Gramlins will lose. And I still remain your superior. [/quote] Lol keep telling yourself that man. Nothing happened to \m/ over methrage, and nothing will happen over you.

Because it provides much lulzs really.

[quote name='JimKongIl' date='11 May 2010 - 05:36 PM' timestamp='1273595754' post='2294783'] Usually a raid implies that profit is your motive. If a nation fights back most of that profit is offset by losses. I think that is the logic he was using. I guess a raid would still be profitable if the nation was not fighting back effectively. [/quote] True, but not all profit has to be tangible.

Pretty much. Grudges do that, and as vox, and karma have shown you piss off certain people they'll wait.

[quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 01:41 PM' timestamp='1273581680' post='2294677'] Why would \m/ choose to make themselves a part of it if they did not support Grams and uncontional surrender?[/quote] Because you put a huge target sign on yourself that said hit me, and people who don't like you did. Simple really.

[quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='11 May 2010 - 04:51 AM' timestamp='1273549890' post='2294429'] Wow, and some people say [i]I[/i] won't let go of a grudge. Oh well. TBB knew what he was getting himself into. [/quote] If I've learned anything about this game it's that grudges die hard.