Jump to content

Gerald Meanĕ

Members
  • Posts

    369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gerald Meanĕ

  1. [quote name='lmcfalcon12' date='07 July 2010 - 12:22 AM' timestamp='1278458521' post='2361704'] Once again, entitled to my opinion. See here in America, we are allotted the right to free speech. Silly of me to suspect that this God given right would carry over to the Legion on the BBs. I'm sorry for being so stupid. [/quote] Unfortunately we aren't in america. Free speech doesn't carry over to privately owned areas like cn and so forth where the owners can get rid of you if they like for what you say.
  2. [quote name='The Arbiter' date='07 July 2010 - 12:15 AM' timestamp='1278458108' post='2361688'] A personal insult? The 500 tech was for disobeying a BB gag and trolling in an improper manner. It was just so bad... [/quote] Why didn't you just kick him out then, as you pretty much ensured that happening with such a crazy punishment.
  3. [quote name='Fernando12' date='27 May 2010 - 11:45 PM' timestamp='1275000306' post='2313946'] Gramlins is making this an entirely different war. CnG should not interfere if IRON allies wish to assist IRON in taking on the Gramlins upper tier. If CnG threatens any action the CnG is no better than those they replaced. Gramlins isn't going to come to peace anytime soon. IRON should be free to call on allies if they wish to take them on. IF, they feel it is worth the damages just to get this thing over with. [/quote] I wouldn't say this is a different war. I'd say the cb for the war has long since been rendered finished, and there aren't enough THIS IS MADNESS pictures on the internet for why it still goes on. Also who replaced who now?
  4. So I'm assuming this is like the eve incident?
  5. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 10:04 PM' timestamp='1273611829' post='2295142'] Well the mighty \m/ smacks around a nation that most people could build in a week with nukes. And bragging about it no less. Wow you all sure are impressive. How will I ever rebuild back to my former level? Well as much as you love watching me, why don't you start watching Gramlins? They have layed out a direct threat to yours and evey other alliance on Planet Bob by trying to set a precedent of uncconditional surrender. Why don't you show how big you are by doing something about it? I know your to big of cowards to raid them but, at least you could create a petition or something. It might be good to think about something other then me all day. Just how do you feel about Gramlins? [/quote] If you've got them use them I always say. Not to mention we've got to start building up that grl again so no one gets too complacent with it. As far as gramlins goes they're a threat to \m/ in the same way \m/ is a threat to them, which is to say none. Really the unconditional surrender thing only works against them ironically enough in the same way you ended up being attacked. It is very rare for the slighted to forget, and gramlins will have to keep itself from ever getting into a situation where it is on the losing side of a war since no one has forgotten what they did. All that needs to be done is wait for the right time.
  6. To be honest I actually don't mind the idea of unconditional surrender in alliance wars if it is warranted. Gramlins case isn't really warrented, but in the case of the whole war at the start between top/ect vrs the people they attacked I could see unconditional surrender being used.
  7. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 09:51 PM' timestamp='1273611070' post='2295115'] To be honest \m/ has no idea what they are doing. [/quote] Sure we do, we're watching some members of ours smack you around.
  8. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 07:49 PM' timestamp='1273603780' post='2294910'] You know it has nothing to with me. [/quote] Keep telling yourself that. I'm just enjoying the spectacle really. Still pretty predictable though since the ending will still be the same with you having next to nothing nation wise, and not really accomplishing what you set out to do. With all the time you're spending on us instead of gramlins it isn't any wonder though why it'll turn out that way.
  9. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 07:27 PM' timestamp='1273602424' post='2294881'] And yet another one surrenders. Left with nothing to say but, lol or lulz. Well there sure has been a great deal teeth nashing, anger and complaining by \m/ for some lulzs. For an alliance that seems to be obsessed with me, you should have known this was a bad idea. Soon however \m/ will crawl back under its rock and I will continue to deal with Gramlins. And in the end outside of handing people a gold mine of quotes that will be used against you later nothing will have changed. Gramlins will lose. And I still remain your superior. [/quote] Lol keep telling yourself that man. Nothing happened to \m/ over methrage, and nothing will happen over you.
  10. [quote name='JimKongIl' date='11 May 2010 - 05:36 PM' timestamp='1273595754' post='2294783'] Usually a raid implies that profit is your motive. If a nation fights back most of that profit is offset by losses. I think that is the logic he was using. I guess a raid would still be profitable if the nation was not fighting back effectively. [/quote] True, but not all profit has to be tangible.
  11. Pretty much. Grudges do that, and as vox, and karma have shown you piss off certain people they'll wait.
  12. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 01:41 PM' timestamp='1273581680' post='2294677'] Why would \m/ choose to make themselves a part of it if they did not support Grams and uncontional surrender?[/quote] Because you put a huge target sign on yourself that said hit me, and people who don't like you did. Simple really.
  13. [quote name='Ashoka the Great' date='11 May 2010 - 04:51 AM' timestamp='1273549890' post='2294429'] Wow, and some people say [i]I[/i] won't let go of a grudge. Oh well. TBB knew what he was getting himself into. [/quote] If I've learned anything about this game it's that grudges die hard.
  14. [quote name='Solomon' date='11 May 2010 - 04:42 AM' timestamp='1273549310' post='2294420'] So thank you very much for offering an answer that is covered in smoke, anyone wanna answer if \m/ would hit members of this alliance that makes a profitable war impossible? Would gramlins be the only counter attackers? Denying doesnt make it false, so just give the man what he wants.....Show your support or don't. Doesnt really matter just be CLEAR. [/quote] Again this isn't about members or gramlins this is about tbb. He did something that screamed attack me so he got attacked. \m/ has nothing to do with the gramlins/tbb situation aside from the fact that it alerted the people who wanted to hit tbb to the opportunity to do so. This has nothing to do with tangible profit.
  15. [quote name='Solomon' date='11 May 2010 - 04:28 AM' timestamp='1273548501' post='2294398'] With all that has been said about this I have just one question. Obvisiously certain people believe it needed to raid this man for whatever reasons. If his alliance would have stronger members like around 100k ns, would they too be raided as tech targets or would you aid gramlins for the real reason? As founder of Purplol I understand your pain and need for what you have done. Reroll and look me up. O/TBBAF [/quote] This has nothing to do with other members. Again tbb got people miffed at him, and then decided to announce to the world that he was all alone. I'm pretty sure the same thing would happen to other people if they just randomly did that as well really. I'll put it this way, if Ivan Moldavi decided to resign the NPO and declare war on LUE after great war one for some reason you can bet he'd have his slots filled by people he angered quickly.
  16. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 04:18 AM' timestamp='1273547901' post='2294385'] And the story changes again. Now I have pissed off some people? Really? Where were they when I had no alliance for so long? Its odd they just show up now is it not? Unless I have done something as of late that made them angry? Hmmm what could that have been? Ah yes declaring war on Gramlins and the harsh terms of Unconditional Surrender. See now that story makes you all look even worse. So go back and talk it over and come back again when you all have one story that somehow does not end up with you being at war defending Gramlins. You tried its a raid and its a war because I made you sad and those did not work. So until you can come up with something other than creating all this drama and war to deflect attention away from Gramlins that is what we will have to work with. I will be waiting. [/quote] Again man duhhhh you probably wouldn't be being attacked unless you pissed people off. As for why they didn't attack you when you were in an alliance probably because they didn't care enough about it to go out of their way to attack you. You just had to go and put a huge target sign up though that seems to have jogged enough people's memories where they decided to hit you. Keep on thinking it's something larger though, methrage did too, and look where it got him.
  17. [quote name='magicninja' date='11 May 2010 - 04:14 AM' timestamp='1273547652' post='2294381'] By all means do whatever you want to do, I certainly don't care man. However, there are some individuals and alliances who do. I don't think you'll take too much crap for this stunt but as you get more and more testier, someday, someone will have something to say. You know how it is. [/quote] Yea that's always the case, but I really doubt too many people can have things to say about hitting people they don't like when the opportunity presents itself considering how often that happens. [quote name='magicninja' date='11 May 2010 - 04:16 AM' timestamp='1273547777' post='2294382'] So then it's just petty, childish, crap? You woulda been better off with the defending gremlins shtick. [/quote] So sorry to offend since petty childish crap pretty much drives cn's karma train.
  18. Well yea because it's funny to do so. This isn't about tech, it's about you having pissed off certain people who have now taken the opportunity to raid you since you left yourself open for it. So sorry, but again this doesn't have anything to do with gramlins policies.
  19. [quote name='The Big Bad' date='11 May 2010 - 12:29 AM' timestamp='1273534139' post='2294091'] No. You see I am not claiming I made \m/ do this to themselves. I did not make them say and do things that will be used against them later. I do not claim to be making \m/ do stupid things. I did not make \m/ go to war to support Gramlins and Unconditonal Surrender terms. I do not claim to be making them look like idiots. That have done that themselves. Was I pretty sure they would do something like this? Oh yeah. But never at this level of stupid. I also thought you all would come and I still think you might of if you had not seen it blow up in \m/ face. But in the end this has nothing to with \m/ they were just a little extra something to toss in if they were dumb enough to fall for it. They are nothing but a side show. They will keep on screaming and crying here because they know they just did something real stupid. The more they post the more you know they are desperate to try and salvage this. Its like watching lemmings jump off a cliff. They just can not help themselves. And when their time comes they will have to have this shoved in their faces over and over again. Thats not my fault. I did not make them do it, I just gave them the opportunity. They did it of their own free will. Unprovoked. Nobody, not even me could trick an alliance into acting this stupid. This does however have to with Gramlins. They will not be allowed to demand unconditional surrender. This is not a precedent that will be allowed to be set no matter how hard they and \m/ fight for it. Two alliances both short sighted, poorly led, and desperate to show the world how strong they are now fight on the same side. And now they both make desperate aurguments to support what they are doing side by side with threats to destroy and then in the same breath claims they just don't care what anyone thinks. Its is interesting just how much these to alliances have in common. [/quote] Lol sorry man but this is just like methrage. It's got nothing to do with gramlins aside from the fact that you decided to go it alone and declare war on them. Keep thinking it's something bigger though.
  20. [quote name='ktarthan' date='10 May 2010 - 09:37 PM' timestamp='1273523852' post='2293869'] Woah, I am seriously having a case of deja vu here. Didn't someone already do this? [/quote] That would be methrage, and ironically enough this has pretty much turned out the same way. Just waiting for tbb to declare war on goons now.
  21. [quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' date='10 May 2010 - 04:19 PM' timestamp='1273504754' post='2293601'] Yeah, in theory. In reality, should the defender retaliate or have any chance of causing harm, he will likely get jumped not by one but by three raiders. Hyenas don't hunt alone. Good luck TBB. [/quote] Not really. Look at my recent war with methrage. I was eating wrc nukes, but didn't call in any help from \m/ as I knew that was the price I paid for my raid.
  22. [quote name='Dochartaigh' date='10 May 2010 - 03:37 PM' timestamp='1273502212' post='2293569'] ahhh... i thought ya'll had the same regulations as the original \m/. sorry for my mistake in that belief. at least this time around ya'll can't make the same claims as the original version. [/quote] I'm pretty sure we didn't have many regulations in there either.
  23. [quote name='Dochartaigh' date='10 May 2010 - 03:15 PM' timestamp='1273500898' post='2293551'] that should be believed as much as \m/ actually has any kind of real regulations on how they raid. we have seen how high those regulations are actually regarded.[/quote] We really don't have too many regulations on how we raid, because it's more fun that way. Should any individual member get smacked around due to that such is life, and we deal with it as such.
×
×
  • Create New...