baseballer790 Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 (edited) In light of the recent surrender of the NPO in the Karma War, I have decided to compile the total war losses from the NPO. These stats are from April 21 (The Day before the war started) - July 19th (The day the war ended). I also have graphs with the losses after each month. Before the war started, the New Pacific Order had a total of 22,733,456 Nation Strength. After the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 5,149,696 Nation Strength. The New Pacific Order lost a total of 17,583,760 Nation Strength. Before the war, the New Pacific Order had a score of 86.18. After the war, the New Pacific Order had 24.95. The New Pacific Order lost a total of 61.23 points from their Alliance Score. Before the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 4,139,515 Infrastructure. After the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 803,777 Infrastructure. The New Pacific Order lost a total of 3,335,738 Infrastructure. Before the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 1,037,686 Technology. After the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 347,908 Technology. The New Pacific Order lost a total of 689,778 Technology. Before the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 4,138 Nukes. After the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 1,237 Nukes. The New Pacific Order lost a total of 2,901 Nukes. Before the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 930 Nations. After the war, the New Pacific Order had a total of 621 Nations. The New Pacific Order lost a total of 309 Nations. Before War After War Losses Strength22,733,4565,149,69617,583,760 Score86.1824.9561.23 Infra4,139,515803,7773,335,738 Tech1,037,686347,908689,778 Nukes4,1381,2372,901 Nations930621309And there we go. By the looks of things, the first month of war for the NPO was the worst . And for those of you who were wondering, the amount of tech lost equals up to $20,693,340,000 (100 tech = $3,000,000). -baseballer790 EDIT: Yes, I was bored. Edited July 20, 2009 by baseballer790 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essenia Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Shame you didn't keep track of wonders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weirdgus Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Awesome work man, looks like quite some effort there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 The graph showing their epic reconstruction will be even more impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elendil old Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Why wonders? The amount created? Also nukes used over lost, and thanks for the stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnCapistan Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 YAY we took the lost most members slot I beleive. Nevertheless interesting read BB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseballer790 Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Why wonders? The amount created? Also nukes used over lost, and thanks for the stats. Not all those nukes were used . Also, a nuke used is a nuke lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythegfx Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Interesting, thanks for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 NPO probably used a lot more nukes than that, given that nations were rebuying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shimmer Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Well, they haven't lost all the NS yet. They still have to decom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseballer790 Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Well, they haven't lost all the NS yet. They still have to decom. This is just so people can see how big of a hit they took from other alliances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancer Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Would be interesting to compare this to the Karma coalition loses. I don't know who has the time to punch those numbers, but it would be a neat comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noob5 Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 (edited) Now, we just need someone to compile the stats of the 18 or so alliances that ganged up on us... Edited July 20, 2009 by noob5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseballer790 Posted July 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Would be interesting to compare this to the Karma coalition loses. I don't know who has the time to punch those numbers, but it would be a neat comparison. My attention span could not do that That'd take like 5 hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Learz Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Quite a bit of work, nice job! It might be interesting to keep track of these thing as the NPO pays reps (specifically, the tech chart). Again, nice job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grossman Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Thanks for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMitt King Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Nice stats. Very interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankdolf Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 I thought the war started on the 20th, not two days later. Might be mistaken though >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epik High Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Why wonders? The amount created? Also nukes used over lost, and thanks for the stats. I think it would be some sort of measure of the number of "core" or "developed" members over time. Membership numbers don't really reflect this, so you can use wonders as the difference between a noob and a more established nation. Wonders aren't going to be destroyed, so you get a better representation of member retention rates. You could also look at the type of wonders; losing 10 WRC nations is a bigger loss than losing 10 SSS nations, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord GVChamp Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Good to see that their numbers held up fairly well. They lost damn near 80% of everything else, but the community was strong enough to lose only a third of their overall number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinite Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Fun fact: The graph for the amount of fun in the war is the exact inverse. Great job keeping these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Good to see that their numbers held up fairly well. They lost damn near 80% of everything else, but the community was strong enough to lose only a third of their overall number When you consider new nations who've joined since the war started, it's closer to half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheThirdMark Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 They lost way more then just a third. But many others joined up. Still 'fun' to see how much one can lose without fighting. Can you imagine what the NPO would have lost if they actually held their words and fought the war they started? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 Impressive. Most impressive. ..isn't that a Vader quote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertag Posted July 21, 2009 Report Share Posted July 21, 2009 By Scizor2120 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts