dejarue Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 We already have a superbloc. It's called the SuperFriends. Right on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Death II Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 We dont need superblocs. they ruin the game. We need smaller blocs with less individual power. Also less MDP's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dan Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 There won't be a new bloc with the intent of creating a hegemony. You'll just have loving, caring leaders guiding you through the night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 PPF is the next superbloc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Salovsky Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 2. Karma and the Coalition of Chicken@#$%s lol... No, cereally... 0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tron Paul Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 It will be the same system we have now, a hedgemony with various blocs tied through a treaty web. In the center will be SF and Citadel, on the outside you'll see sphere themed blocs and minor blocs (PWN, LEO, Power Rangers, etc). You'll also see the remnants of old hedgemony quickly align with new hedgemony, I guarantee it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyria Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 42. no more, no less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incitatus Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) I hope none. Blocs are a waste of space, make the web messy and take away the importance of individual treaties. The only time the word "blocs" should ever be used again is if there is a war and there are a "bloc" on each side. "Example, The League bloc" No more Blocs! Biggest mistake Dilber made was coming up with the treaty bloc (Initiative, for those of you who need a history lesson...and eventually NADC thought blocs were cool too and GUARD came along, which expanded to others and so on) )): Initiative )): Edited April 23, 2009 by Incitatus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 GUARD was created before the Initiative. I'm gonna take issue with Cowboy Cornhilio when he says SF and Cit will form the major center of a new hegemony. I think the political/philosophical differences between the two are too great for their cooperation to outlast this war. More likely that they'll form the cores of two separate sides of a web. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incitatus Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 GUARD was created before the Initiative.I'm gonna take issue with Cowboy Cornhilio when he says SF and Cit will form the major center of a new hegemony. I think the political/philosophical differences between the two are too great for their cooperation to outlast this war. More likely that they'll form the cores of two separate sides of a web. I'm not 100% sure I'm right but I'd be willing to challenge you on that. When Ini talks where going on....GUARD had not been thought of.... (Drinking Buddies Pact was also a bloc created by Dilber, which I believe occured before GUARD So regardless, Dilber gets the cred for starting the whole peace-time blocs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I'm not 100% sure I'm right but I'd be willing to challenge you on that. When Ini talks where going on....GUARD had not been thought of....(Drinking Buddies Pact was also a bloc created by Dilber, which I believe occured before GUARD So regardless, Dilber gets the cred for starting the whole peace-time blocs) from wiki: GUARD was the first of these extended alliances, jointly founded by the North Atlantic Defense Coalition (NADC), the Organized Nations of Superiority (ONOS), and the Commonwealth of Sovereign Nations (CSN), as an alternative to the confusion of the MDP Web. They would later be joined by The Templar Knights (TTK), the Tri-Color Federation (TCF) and the United Sovereign Nations (USN). While the eldest of these blocs, it would be dwarfed by its successors.The Initiative was the second of these major power blocs. It began as a four-way MADP between the alliances of FAN, GOONS, NPO, and NpO, but more alliances would be invited to join until it became the largest and most powerful of the power blocs. At its height, the Initiative consisted of the NPO, NpO, GOONS, FAN, \m/, VE, TOP, GGA, CIS, MDC, and NoR (who by now had made amends with their former allies.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incitatus Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 from wiki: Ah, the memories from yester-year. Thanks. I do recall that now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 The age of few powerful alliances is over. The age of many honourable alliances has began. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancer Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I wasn't aware SF was dissolving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCToker Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 We dont need superblocs. they ruin the game. We need smaller blocs with less individual power. Also less MDP's We also need less stupidity, but we both know neither of those are happening anytime soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rishnokof Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) It is clear that most of the next global hegemony/superbloc will come from the splitting Q alliances and superfriends. With so many alliances involved or waiting in the wings they all cant join, it would be chaos. The whos are more difficult but the number is easier to speculate on. SuperFriends aren't splitting any time soon. And no, it is not clear there will be a new hegemony/superbloc at all, do your homework before posting. Edited April 23, 2009 by rishnokof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCToker Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 It is clear that most of the next global hegemony/superbloc will come from the splitting Q alliances and superfriends. With so many alliances involved or waiting in the wings they all cant join, it would be chaos. The whos are more difficult but the number is easier to speculate on. I'm normally nicer to people, but when someone comes out of nowhere and says a bloc that both my current (RIA) and former (R&R) alliances were in is going to be splitting up, I get agitated. As such: Stop talking. Go learn about SF. Start talking again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) Guys, I'm pretty sure he means that Superfriends and the alliances that split from Q will be forming a superbloc after the war. I think he's wrong to think that such a superbloc will form, but the way I read the sentence, I don't think he's trying to imply that Superfriends will be splitting up. Take your energy elsewhere, please. Edited April 23, 2009 by Sovyet Gelibolu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auto98 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 How many are in Q? Yeah, that many. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demosthenes Locke Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 It is clear that most of the next global hegemony/superbloc will come from the splitting Q alliances and superfriends. With so many alliances involved or waiting in the wings they all cant join, it would be chaos. The whos are more difficult but the number is easier to speculate on. Superfriends will not split. Stop making idiotic assumptions based on nothing. This war is still too early in its execution to determine anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentor Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 NoneIf anything we are going to see more small blocs of really close alliances. I also think so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted April 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Guys, I'm pretty sure he means that Superfriends and the alliances that split from Q will be forming a superbloc after the war. This ^ The denials tell me everything I need to know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 The denials tell me everything I need to know I really shouldn't have to make your posts for you, you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minilla Island Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 There will be several smaller treaty blocs of 5-8 members who share close relations and ties. The "Superbloc" is dead and buried after the war. As for a "Hegemony", there will be long term control from IRON, TOP and Polaris, but will be split into three directions. NSO is a wildcard for a "fourth way", and the smaller blocs will be under these. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Formal Blocs are so '06...informal blocs will form, and dissolve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.