magicninja Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Sheeple is a hilarious insult to use when your entire alliance is based on doing whatever TPF tells you to do. Example? I'll wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BogdanSin Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I'm new to this CN forum stuff, please try to help me out here. When people offer a different opinion than your own, you take it as a joke and put a smiley face at the end of your sentence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I could have sworn I just told you people to knock it off with the off topic. Last verbal next person gets a full warn. Have a nice day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Although I'm confused about the Valhalla treaty, I'm glad to see my former home officially ending EZI/PZI. Sheeple is a hilarious insult to use when your entire alliance is based on doing whatever TPF tells you to do. That is absolutely not the case with Soldier. Soldier went with the alliance who did not bend to the request of a larger foreign power to allow that power to attack Soldier. TPF stood with Soldier when Soldier's other partners suggested bending to foreign commands. Quite ignorant of you to make such rash statements. edit: Sorry Darth Revan. Edited April 15, 2009 by youwish959 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poobah Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I'm new to this CN forum stuff, please try to help me out here. When people offer a different opinion than your own, you take it as a joke and put a smiley face at the end of your sentence? Unfortunately, this is probably the most truthful thing I have seen on these forums in a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix von Agnu Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) I'm only afraid of Pansy. And that's not because of his warring skills Just remember "baa means no." It is nice to see out stance on E/PZI put up officially. Edited April 15, 2009 by Felix von Agnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBRaiders Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Congrats to TPF for the formal policy in regards to enemy combatants. I know you and Valhalla are still tied via Continuum and I will admit to leaning towards the crowd calling shens, but if not I hope you guys get together and announce a nice new treaty upgrade soon. I really can't imagine the next big war where you two aren't fighting side by side. Almost makes me sad to even think about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ochocinco Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Except extorting Valhallan allies is not only pretty low, but a ZIable offense. Your childish threats to release government information from your previous alliance (which holds a MDoAP with your current alliance) is a pretty clear cut case. Honestly, why would you go through and start stockpiling screenshots on your way out if you didn't plan to use them and/or hang them over someone's head?You were pretty much blacklisted when I let you come to RoK and my reward for gving you a chance is treachery. You're a traitor, a liar, and now a twice over coward ... you should be ashamed of yourself. Oh man, I like this new Van Hoo. EDIT: My opinions regarding the OP are complex and varied. Edited April 15, 2009 by ochocinco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyriq Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Congrats to TPF for the formal policy in regards to enemy combatants.I know you and Valhalla are still tied via Continuum and I will admit to leaning towards the crowd calling shens, but if not I hope you guys get together and announce a nice new treaty upgrade soon. I really can't imagine the next big war where you two aren't fighting side by side. Almost makes me sad to even think about it. This post is awesome on so many levels. Edit: Oh, and great to see the policy on EZI/PZI Edited April 15, 2009 by eyriq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calixo Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 well this topic has been quite a trip. uhh.. congrats... i think. cancellation real or not, their still tied in via Q, so it dosn't matter either way. EZI/PZI ending, is always something good to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CptGodzilla Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) ChairmanHal still makes me laugh. I'm still think he is trying to prove something... I've said it before, I'll say it again: ChairmanHal valhalla gov 09! Then when he can't take the heat of valhalla gov, he can give out their secrets in '10 edit: i could use this to add something about the OP / topic at hand, but i am going to man up and take the warn for obviously not regarding the post by darth revan Edited April 15, 2009 by CptGodzilla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathcat Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I'm only afraid of Pansy. And that's not because of his warring skills Do you wear a sheep costume to bed or baa in your sleep? If not.. Pansy is definitely feared for his casualty collecting skills I'll miss this treaty and especially Kry and Sky.. oh and that Pansy guy too.. If only I had more time to cook for everyone oo/ Valhalla.. Best Regards my Viking Brethern Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OD45Glock Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Good luck to our allies in both Valhalla and TPF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 So what's your policy on OOC attacks then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auto98 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 So what's your policy on OOC attacks then? Why, are you thinking of making some? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 While I don't care for the vagueness in the newly state EZI issue, it is at least a step in the right direction as I see it. As with anything, the proof will be in how you go forward with the new policy and in dealing with the vagueness of it. As to the treaty, I must offer my condolences that the cancellation of any treaty signifies a loss of friendship that the treaty was built upon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Why, are you thinking of making some? Your question is a bit presumptuous. Your policy to me seems ambiguous, which is why I want to clarify. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soccerbum Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Your question is a bit presumptuous. Your policy to me seems ambiguous, which is why I want to clarify. That's reasonable. Well, does anyone in TPF have an answer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Why, are you thinking of making some? Yes, implying that someone may be considering making an 'OOC attack' sure seems like an appropriate response to a legitimate question! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soccerbum Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Yes, implying that someone may be considering making an 'OOC attack' sure seems like an appropriate response to a legitimate question! You said it better than myself, Mr. Revanche sir. I think I like you. Hey, we should sign a treaty! I await TPF's answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 You said it better than myself, Mr. Revanche sir. I think I like you. Hey, we should sign a treaty!I await TPF's answer. Sign an agreement with Nemesis? Over my dead career! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soccerbum Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Sign an agreement with Nemesis? Over my dead career! I see what you did thar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Why, are you thinking of making some? Why are you not thinking.... of making some? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edikroma Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Well, I'm not FA, so don't quote me on anything. I would think that the punishment for OOC attacks would be proportionate to the level and severity of those attacks. Besides, I think after a while, rulers who consistently resort to OOC attacks would be punished not by the players, but rather by admin and the mod staff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Well, I'm not FA, so don't quote me on anything. I would think that the punishment for OOC attacks would be proportionate to the level and severity of those attacks. Besides, I think after a while, rulers who consistently resort to OOC attacks would be punished not by the players, but rather by admin and the mod staff. OOC: I'm afraid you're mistaken. Those attacks, by definition, should only be punished by the mods and admin as that is the very definition of out of character. Meaning they have nothing to do with in character, and thus have no way of affecting anything in this world. My apologies for the derail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.