Unko Kalaikz Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 "We've accomplished a lot but can't tell you about it."Very convincing. My thoughts exactly. I think the world at large will believe the claims of organizations like BC, Vox and Rebillon when we see evidence of their influence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cokekila Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 The propaganda is great... but so wasnt Iraqs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 The propaganda is great... but so wasnt Iraqs. This is a terrible reference that makes almost no sense. Anyways, another day, another failed alliance trying to change the world. When will this one die? Nobody knows :v Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cokekila Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 In defense of my post... The propaganda is great (ala videos on youtube) and so wasnt Iraqs (ala Baghdad Bob saying Iraq was winning the war when the coalition was on its way to baghdad) Although we all know how that turned out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogenes Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 In defense of my post...The propaganda is great (ala videos on youtube) and so wasnt Iraqs (ala Baghdad Bob saying Iraq was winning the war when the coalition was on its way to baghdad) Although we all know how that turned out. Yeah...it's still a terrible reference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cokekila Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 IM sorry. I learned my lesson ill be good now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 This is a terrible reference that makes almost no sense.Anyways, another day, another failed alliance trying to change the world. When will this one die? Nobody knows :v There are many that would say the same about your alliance as well. It seems to me, and many others, that having a goal and operating in game = phail. We, naturally, are an anti-NPO alliance. Embarking down the same paths others like us have taken certainly equals phail. When we succeed at our goals, you will undoubtedly eat your words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 When we succeed at our goals, you will undoubtedly eat your words. BC threatens us like a warm spring breeze. Any members that are a part of you would be a part of Vox anyway, so you're doing exactly nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 There are many that would say the same about your alliance as well. It seems to me, and many others, that having a goal and operating in game = phail. We, naturally, are an anti-NPO alliance. Embarking down the same paths others like us have taken certainly equals phail. When we succeed at our goals, you will undoubtedly eat your words. I know not of a single person who thinks that way of Nemesis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 There are many that would say the same about your alliance as well. It seems to me, and many others, that having a goal and operating in game = phail. We, naturally, are an anti-NPO alliance. Embarking down the same paths others like us have taken certainly equals phail. When we succeed at our goals, you will undoubtedly eat your words. I don't happen to know these many you refer to, sorry :/ I know not of a single person who thinks that way of Nemesis. I want to hate you but you make it so difficult, curse you NPO menace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 There are many that would say the same about your alliance as well. And if anyone wanted know just how bad Blackstone's intelligence gathering is this shows it. You all seem to have zero ability to understand anything that goes on. How you can effect change when you don't even know what is happening around you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 BC threatens us like a warm spring breeze. If this was the case, then NPO's witch-hunts were for nothing, and those members should be let back in. Regardless, we love that you have this mentality, and hope that you continue it. It is operationally irresponsible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 I would also like for the NPOers to be reminded of this topic, posted not so long ago, paying special attention to the bottom of post #1. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=44025 It's bad to openly conflict with your own goverment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 If this was the case, then NPO's witch-hunts were for nothing, and those members should be let back in. We can't do that. We have a reputation to keep, after all. I would also like for the NPOers to be reminded of this topic, posted not so long ago, paying special attention to the bottom of post #1.http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=44025 It's bad to openly conflict with your own goverment. I think you linked the wrong thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 No, it's correct. Your observation skills are just lacking. The section of that post in reference, is called "International Relations". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 No, it's correct. Your observation skills are just lacking. The section of that post in reference, is called "International Relations". Long before the Paul Protocols were put into place it was against the rules to go against what the officials of the New Pacific Order ordered you to do. We are, after all, a military alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Long before the Paul Protocols were put into place it was against the rules to go against what the officials of the New Pacific Order ordered you to do.We are, after all, a military alliance. Alas. Something that we can agree on. It does seem like those protocols are being ignored with almost each NPO statement here, however. Which is bad. Which I have already mentioned. Welcome back to the discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 My thoughts exactly. I think the world at large will believe the claims of organizations like BC, Vox and Rebillon when we see evidence of their influence. To be Count da Silva is to be inherently wrong. QFT. Taken from your brain-child: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=48899 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvon Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) We've already accomplished much, but those things are also classified, I'm afraid. Fortunately, impressing you isn't on our priorities list. We have too - such as beating you to your goal. Only, it's classified. Moo hasn't even been made privvy yet. Edited February 23, 2009 by Rayvon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 (edited) I guess that means a super sekrit steak dinner for tonight. Edited February 23, 2009 by Windsor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 No, it's correct. Your observation skills are just lacking. The section of that post in reference, is called "International Relations". Oh. You think we're not being nice enough to you. Um, ok. I'll... try to be nicer as you plot our destruction? Wait, I'm still being passive-aggresive. I'll send myself back to the kitten cage, don't worry guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windsor Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Oh. You think we're not being nice enough to you. Um, ok. I'll... try to be nicer as you plot our destruction?Wait, I'm still being passive-aggresive. I'll send myself back to the kitten cage, don't worry guys. Goooood. I'm glad to see that an actual challenge to an entity that is seemingly unchallengeable is something that would be considered welcomed with professionalism. It's exactly what we feel is needed in the cyberverse today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Specific Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Goooood. I'm glad to see that an actual challenge to an entity that is seemingly unchallengeable is something that would be considered welcomed with professionalism. It's exactly what we feel is needed in the cyberverse today. Because somehow it is professional when gentleman shake hands before a duel? Wish you chaps would kiss and make up already. Then the real drama can begin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.