Lord Hitchcock Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, Devialance said: I always fine the person who has nothing to lose talks the most crap, with you being 1414 days old and a NS of 1.4k you have nothing to lose, its funny really, maybe thats why you are so active on the forums talking !@#$ because you risk nothing, but all the others in your AA risks everything with you being their voice. I have more to lose than you. I have friends on the line everyday, whom together we've built quite the name for ourselves. However we've always played like we've got nothing to lose, because alike in your shoes, you've already lost. Edited July 20, 2017 by Lord Hitchcock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericsw Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 9 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said: I have more to lose than you. I have friends on the line everyday, whom together we've built quite the name for ourselves. However we've always played like we've got nothing to lose, because alike in your shoes, you've already lost. Deep, it´s like you think about stuff before you say it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 May this righteous Jacktifada guide you in scorching the earth of the pervert and his misguided producerists! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatest Mothers Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 19 hours ago, ericsw said: while you guys do one round and then exit the battlefield in PM The funniest part of this is that he (and also Serberus) try to shame people to engage battle at his own terms, subtly alleging that his way is the honourable way, while him and his ilks unfairly profited of a voluntary interruption of attacks after a request of peace. He just miss an important detail: just only enemies who act in a totally honourable way can shame others - you have to be virtuos in order to have the power to shame your enemy. When your enemy do not engage you in the second battle, after having won the first and having 88% chances of winning, and offers peace, if you attack without firstly rejecting peace then you aren't being honourable: you're showing that your words have no value and you use illegal means. By doing so you lose the respect of the enemy and your affirmations lost every worth and meaning. You then become a possible target that will be dealt when and if we'll decide to do it, we'll eventually engage at our own terms and when and if we'll wish to do. Your opinion about "the fair way to fight" is irrelevant and your words are worthless, since you already proved to lack honor. The Empress of Peace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericsw Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Greatest Mothers said: The funniest part of this is that he (and also Serberus) try to shame people to engage battle at his own terms, subtly alleging that his way is the honourable way, while him and his ilks unfairly profited of a voluntary interruption of attacks after a request of peace. He just miss an important detail: just only enemies who act in a totally honourable way can shame others - you have to be virtuos in order to have the power to shame your enemy. When your enemy do not engage you in the second battle, after having won the first and having 88% chances of winning, and offers peace, if you attack without firstly rejecting peace then you aren't being honourable: you're showing that your words have no value and you use illegal means. By doing so you lose the respect of the enemy and your affirmations lost every worth and meaning. You then become a possible target that will be dealt when and if we'll decide to do it, we'll eventually engage at our own terms and when and if we'll wish to do. Your opinion about "the fair way to fight" is irrelevant and your words are worthless, since you already proved to lack honor. The Empress of Peace. What the hell are you on about You deployed on the day you offered peace, why do that if did not want to engage. and there is no such tradition of offering peace to your opponents on the last day of war outside the looney bin which is SNX. In addition, there is no way to ´reject´the peace offer other than attack you which I did! the fact is, you messed up your deployment, realised it, then offered peace with the intention of getting it accepted so you could go into PM before being countered. Stop pretending this is some standard that exists in CN as a whole because it doesnt. And stop crying, get over it, you lost the round. Edited July 20, 2017 by ericsw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Khan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, Greatest Mothers said: You then become a possible target that will be dealt when and if we'll decide to do it, we'll eventually engage at our own terms and when and if we'll wish to do. Good for you! I support you deciding when and where you'll do battle, better than your idiot of a leader deciding for you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatest Mothers Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, ericsw said: the fact is, you messed up your deployment, realised it, then offered peace with the intention of getting it accepted so you could go into PM before being countered. Nope. Since even after your attacks I defeated Serberus in the second battle: odds were 71% rather than 88%, but still more than enough. 8 minutes ago, ericsw said: And stop crying, get over it, you lost the round. Nope. We won against both Serberus and Conservative South, the targets we attacked. And we lost against you. So it's 2-in-3 battles won War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Femocratic Lands The State Ruler Name: Greatest Mothers Serberus Alliance: Imperium of Supernova X Apocalypse Meow Soldiers Lost: 85,972 136,610 Tanks Lost: 4,043 11,216 Cruise Missiles Lost: 0 0 Aircraft Lost: 41 106 Navy Lost: 4 0 Infrastructure Lost: 611.69 1,050.86 Technology Lost: 175.42 155.49 Land Lost: 408.758 501.851 Land/Tech/Infra: 3,325.29 Strength Lost 4,682.80 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 1,208 of 1,725 existing wars. War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Femocratic Lands Conservative South Ruler Name: Greatest Mothers Body Jryant Alliance: Imperium of Supernova X Apocalypse Meow Soldiers Lost: 129,761 183,634 Tanks Lost: 8,767 17,555 Cruise Missiles Lost: 1 0 Aircraft Lost: 48 167 Navy Lost: 3 0 Infrastructure Lost: 645.31 1,155.56 Technology Lost: 164.47 153.70 Land Lost: 413.451 678.079 Land/Tech/Infra: 3,378.44 Strength Lost 5,252.27 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 1,240 of 1,725 existing wars. War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Land Of Freedom Femocratic Lands Ruler Name: ericsw123 Greatest Mothers Alliance: Apocalypse Meow Imperium of Supernova X Soldiers Lost: 175,172 167,192 Tanks Lost: 18,046 21,867 Cruise Missiles Lost: 0 0 Aircraft Lost: 199 109 Navy Lost: 0 4 Infrastructure Lost: 602.17 888.96 Technology Lost: 130.16 194.58 Land Lost: 363.485 536.143 Land/Tech/Infra: 3,002.55 Strength Lost 4,443.99 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 1,171 of 1,725 existing wars. The Empress of Peace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericsw Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Just now, Greatest Mothers said: Nope. Since even after your attacks I defeated Serberus in the second battle: odds were 71% rather than 88%, but still more than enough. Nope. We won against both Serberus and Conservative South, the targets we attacked. And we lost against you. So it's 2-in-3 battles won War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Femocratic Lands The State Ruler Name: Greatest Mothers Serberus Alliance: Imperium of Supernova X Apocalypse Meow Soldiers Lost: 85,972 136,610 Tanks Lost: 4,043 11,216 Cruise Missiles Lost: 0 0 Aircraft Lost: 41 106 Navy Lost: 4 0 Infrastructure Lost: 611.69 1,050.86 Technology Lost: 175.42 155.49 Land Lost: 408.758 501.851 Land/Tech/Infra: 3,325.29 Strength Lost 4,682.80 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 1,208 of 1,725 existing wars. War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Femocratic Lands Conservative South Ruler Name: Greatest Mothers Body Jryant Alliance: Imperium of Supernova X Apocalypse Meow Soldiers Lost: 129,761 183,634 Tanks Lost: 8,767 17,555 Cruise Missiles Lost: 1 0 Aircraft Lost: 48 167 Navy Lost: 3 0 Infrastructure Lost: 645.31 1,155.56 Technology Lost: 164.47 153.70 Land Lost: 413.451 678.079 Land/Tech/Infra: 3,378.44 Strength Lost 5,252.27 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 1,240 of 1,725 existing wars. War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Land Of Freedom Femocratic Lands Ruler Name: ericsw123 Greatest Mothers Alliance: Apocalypse Meow Imperium of Supernova X Soldiers Lost: 175,172 167,192 Tanks Lost: 18,046 21,867 Cruise Missiles Lost: 0 0 Aircraft Lost: 199 109 Navy Lost: 0 4 Infrastructure Lost: 602.17 888.96 Technology Lost: 130.16 194.58 Land Lost: 363.485 536.143 Land/Tech/Infra: 3,002.55 Strength Lost 4,443.99 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 1,171 of 1,725 existing wars. The Empress of Peace. ok congrats!! lol anyway, lets move on... its round 2 now.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) 7 hours ago, Jay Kay said: But the select few individual wars which amount to your NS lead does? Our upper tier crushed their combatant upper tier, reducing nations like Tiddles as a threat. Upper tier can now generate war aid without being harassed. AM losing 14k tech is pretty awesome as well. Whereas, the damage done by AM's best fighters below the 30k NS range doesn't matter because our guys have most of the war wonders they need, and can continue to fight and produce tech at a consolidated NS range (0-20k NS) and just continue to pummel anyone in AM down here with nukes. RIP Son of Saddam's tech btw. Someones not getting that WRC anytime soon. Edited July 20, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Khan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Immortan Junka said: Our upper tier crushed their combatant upper tier, reducing nations like Tiddles as a threat. Upper tier can now generate war aid without being harassed. AM losing 14k tech is pretty awesome as well. Whereas, the damage done by AM's best fighters below the 30k NS range doesn't matter because our guys have most of the war wonders they need, and can continue to fight and produce tech at a consolidated NS range (0-20k NS) and just continue to pummel anyone in AM down here with nukes. RIP Son of Saddam's tech btw. Someones not getting that WRC anytime soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Kay Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Immortan Junka said: Our upper tier crushed their combatant upper tier, reducing nations like Tiddles as a threat. As of this moment there are only 3 wars above 20k total damage involving 2 SNX nations. So where is this crushing? So back to the original question but expanded on, why are a select 3 individual wars more important than all individual wars? A 53% winning wars isn't crushing to attrition by any stretch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jay Kay said: As of this moment there are only 3 wars above 20k total damage involving 2 SNX nations. So where is this crushing? So back to the original question but expanded on, why are a select 3 individual wars more important than all individual wars? A 53% winning wars isn't crushing to attrition by any stretch. You need to study basic military theory and understand what attrition means before presuming to speak to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Kay Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 45 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said: You need to study basic military theory and understand what attrition means before presuming to speak to me. Attrition is reducing something's strength through sustained attacks and pressure. You have less declared wars and only winning 53% of the wars, you fail on both counts. I thought you was just to consumed by your own propaganda, but I realise you're just an uneducated pleb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 44 minutes ago, Jay Kay said: Attrition is reducing something's strength through sustained attacks and pressure. You have less declared wars and only winning 53% of the wars, you fail on both counts. I thought you was just to consumed by your own propaganda, but I realise you're just an uneducated pleb. I hope Polar never puts you in milcom, our objective is not to be a bunch of barbarians waving swords above our heads, it's to be an organized military force that slowly bleeds out the enemy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrinkledStraw Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 ericsw, I miss and appreciate you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serberus_I Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 18 hours ago, ericsw said: Deep, it´s like you think about stuff before you say it.. LMAO. A little too thought out, in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serberus_I Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 10 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: I hope Polar never puts you in milcom, our objective is not to be a bunch of barbarians waving swords above our heads, it's to be an organized military force that slowly bleeds out the enemy. The only ones bleeding out, from what I can see, is SNX. Poor Junka, better luck next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serberus_I Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 10 hours ago, Jay Kay said: Attrition is reducing something's strength through sustained attacks and pressure. You have less declared wars and only winning 53% of the wars, you fail on both counts. I thought you was just to consumed by your own propaganda, but I realise you're just an uneducated pleb. LOL!!! That actually did make me laugh out loud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Kay Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) 10 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: It's to be an organized military force How many years have you failed to do that now? Quote that slowly bleeds out the enemy. It's good to get your excuses in early. SNX winning wars now at 47.5% Edited July 21, 2017 by Jay Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serberus_I Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 SNX need to come to the realisation that regardless of stats, AM will continue to fight and fight and fight even if our nations are nothing but ashes. Sooner they come to that realisation the better. But woop woop with the stats! Jack be praised! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericsw Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 2 hours ago, Jay Kay said: How many years have you failed to do that now? It's good to get your excuses in early. SNX winning wars now at 47.5% His act of terrorism is backfiring, we look forward to his war of attrition!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) Ok, well I guess some of you have good enough warchests that you can buy infra out of the range of our lower tier... but then you have to face people like Braska and AvengerFin. But whatever dudes, we've skinned more than one cat in the past. Edited July 21, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Khan Posted July 21, 2017 Report Share Posted July 21, 2017 13 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said: Ok, well I guess some of you have good enough warchests that you can buy infra out of the range of our lower tier... but then you have to face people like Braska and AvengerFin. But whatever dudes, we've skinned more than one cat in the past. Deja-vu.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serberus_I Posted July 23, 2017 Report Share Posted July 23, 2017 Haha I used that pic on Discord against Junka! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted July 23, 2017 Report Share Posted July 23, 2017 Uh... ok... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.