The Zigur Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Mogar said: tl'dr we're worthless but at least we got internal propaganda, amrite? If we are worthless, what's that make TBC? We crushed their rogues in every single war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 27 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said: If we are worthless, what's that make TBC? We crushed their rogues in every single war. doing damage matters to someone with a warchest? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernkastel Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 10 hours ago, Neo Uruk said: is nadc literally still alive is bernkastel literally still too bored to be a person you can trust but somehow still around I'm surprised too. on both counts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted June 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 6 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: If we are worthless, what's that make TBC? We crushed their rogues in every single war. Worthless also. We just have no drive to do anything but amuse ourselves, and you make it very easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) They shall be my finest warriors, these men who give of themselves to me. In great armour I shall clad them and with the mightiest weapons they will be armed. They shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe can best them in battle. They are my bulwark against Terror. They are the Defenders of Humanity. They are my Space Marines and they shall know no fear. Edited June 4, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shurukian Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 14 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: Let me put this in a way you might understand. Your alliance is poor and has no active aid. It's alot like SNX was before the July Revolution. Except instead of virtuous knights leading the people, there are a few troublemakers holding back everyone else. Everyone in the Imperium pulled together in order to survive. Today we are prosperous and mighty. There are those among you who joined Hoo hoping to rebuild classical CN. I invite those of TBC who dissaprove of the Chaos to come talk to me on Discord. https://discord.gg/qG5kf Aloha. You think our goal was to rebuild classical CN? How adorable of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 4, 2017 Report Share Posted June 4, 2017 Tell smurth I likes him and I wants him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 What thread won't you !@#$ up with your self-promotion, Junka? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 25 minutes ago, SirWilliam said: What thread won't you !@#$ up with your self-promotion, Junka? Rhetorical question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 1 hour ago, SirWilliam said: What thread won't you !@#$ up with your self-promotion, Junka? Considering that the OP rogued us... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 Rogue implies he had no valid reason, where your continued existence provides more than enough of one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 16 minutes ago, Mogar said: Rogue implies he had no valid reason, where your continued existence provides more than enough of one. Ok Moo-Cows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 The nation's reasoning has nothing to do with whether or not they are rogue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keres Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 7 hours ago, Canik said: The nation's reasoning has nothing to do with whether or not they are rogue. All I got to say to that is I RV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keres Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 18 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: Tell smurth I likes him and I wants him. Smurth was bored and you couldnt really beat him... 10 hours ago, SirWilliam said: What thread won't you !@#$ up with your self-promotion, Junka? A thread ABOUT his self promotion... even then he ends up looking like an idiot. 10 hours ago, AlmightyGrub said: Rhetorical question? Even rhetorical questions have answers if you look hard enough... this is one is actually impossible. 9 hours ago, Immortan Junka said: Considering that the OP rogued us... And your rogues rogued me, and you tried to get others to rogue us... but got shot down pretty hilariously 8 hours ago, Mogar said: Rogue implies he had no valid reason, where your continued existence provides more than enough of one. Junktard is as valid a CB as ive seen in this game... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Not liking someone is not a casus belli. A Casus Belli is an instrument of civilization intended to explain to third parties how an adversary infringed upon your security and sovereignty. It's not valid to use as an excuse to attack people you dont like (that's just roguery and raw aggression). I don't expect barbarians to understand the difference of course, but it must be explained. Edited June 5, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keres Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said: Not liking someone is not a casus belli. A Casus Belli is an instrument of civilization intended to explain to third parties how an adversary infringed upon your security and sovereignty. Stop hitting yourself Edited June 5, 2017 by Keres Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted June 5, 2017 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 32 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said: Not liking someone is not a casus belli. A Casus Belli is an instrument of civilization intended to explain to third parties how an adversary infringed upon your security and sovereignty. It's not valid to use as an excuse to attack people you dont like (that's just roguery and raw aggression). I don't expect barbarians to understand the difference of course, but it must be explained. It's been established a long time ago that it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) The Bear Cavalry is a rogue AA and the Imperium has a valid Casus Belli against them, but we're just sticking to beating up Failbaddon and his henchman at the moment. Edited June 5, 2017 by Immortan Junka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gh0s7 Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) If you want to hit him for his running his mouth, then say so. Otherwise, you ARE in fact roguejng, because this guy is hitting a sovereign, albeit annoying, alliance without any reasoning besides, "I don't like what they're saying!". I think this tbc crap has been blown far out of proportion. If NSO had a problem with the sanctioning of gibsonator, they had the ability to send a message to ftw, but instead of listening to reason and diplomacy, they jump the gun and throw in a sanction. By any real look at this, gibsonator is a rogue. If NSO didn't agree with this, they could've talked to ftw about it. But they didn't, did they? Edited June 5, 2017 by Gh0s7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jekalle Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Gibs is a rogue with extra rogue sauce on top of a poppyseed bun. Edited June 5, 2017 by jekalle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keres Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Gh0s7 said: If you want to hit him for his running his mouth, then say so. Otherwise, you ARE in fact roguejng, because this guy is hitting a sovereign, albeit annoying, alliance without any reasoning besides, "I don't like what they're saying!". I think this tbc crap has been blown far out of proportion. If NSO had a problem with the sanctioning of gibsonator, they had the ability to send a message to ftw, but instead of listening to reason and diplomacy, they jump the gun and throw in a sanction. By any real look at this, gibsonator is a rogue. If NSO didn't agree with this, they could've talked to ftw about it. But they didn't, did they? Id like to point out the sanctions on gibs basically amount to "Because snx shoved their penis down my throat" but instead of listening to reason and diplomacy (or attempting it) they $%&@ed over more than Gibs Edited June 5, 2017 by Keres Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gh0s7 Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) The difference there being ftw has an odoap with isx, and nso has no treaty with tbc. They honored a request from an ally to sanction someone attacking them without cause. I'm sure ftw would be happy to help them find a replacement if they ask for the help Edited June 5, 2017 by Gh0s7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keres Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Gh0s7 said: The difference there being ftw has an odoap with isx, and nso has no treaty with tbc. Technically a MDoAP But thats besides the point though. Penis was still shoved into throats for sanctions. again <3 RV Edited June 5, 2017 by Keres Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gh0s7 Posted June 5, 2017 Report Share Posted June 5, 2017 It's an odoap, ftw's only m level treaty is odn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.