Jump to content

Aquaman Returns


Recommended Posts

[quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1340737330' post='2997435']Blame Londo, he assigned targets. Im free right now though ;)[/quote]

I'd need to pick up over 13k NS for you to be at the top of my range, and probably more than that by 11:05 tonight. Rain check?

(Plus, I'm about to get a much-overdue increase in casualties. You're not. :D)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1340730411' post='2997356']
Some interesting facts about Fark's forces!



One guy has a hidden nuclear missile silo, but no Manhattan Project! Cuban missile crisis, anyone?

TWO guys have WRC's, but were also full up on CM's! Might as well take advantage of and stockpile those ultra-advanced CM's they have now!

The vast majority of them also have no navy, but they sure do make up for that with the number of bombers they have!
[/quote]
Unless those nations have stacks of land and massive warchests, I don't see a problem with not having a navy.

It helps if you know what you are talking about before you call others out. You were already caught calling out an Invicta nation (iirc) for sitting on an infra jump because you didn't know about the third decimal point.

Plus, I am fighting some MK targets that have been less than impressive. But I don't extrapolate their performance to the rest of their alliance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ogaden' timestamp='1340730561' post='2997358']
The best alliances all have 50 CMs
[/quote]

Indeed. If you do have to care for the maintenance cost of 50 Cruise Missiles, it means your warchest is not high enough.

Welcome back Aquaman!

o7 Fark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Darth Banana' timestamp='1340773303' post='2998000']
[img]http://s12.postimage.org/m9fhf6r0t/farkblitz.gif[/img]
[/quote]

Made me lol hard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Darth Banana' timestamp='1340773303' post='2998000']
[img]http://s12.postimage.org/m9fhf6r0t/farkblitz.gif[/img]
[/quote]

Oh my.. damn near pissed myself. who made this? mad props.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Melancholy Culkin' timestamp='1340816857' post='2998449']
Guys there's a propaganda thread for a reason :<
[/quote]

And this is a declaration of war, how are the two unrelated. When they've always been used in conjunction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1340756364' post='2997663']
Unless those nations have stacks of land and massive warchests, I don't see a problem with not having a navy.

It helps if you know what you are talking about before you call others out. You were already caught calling out an Invicta nation (iirc) for sitting on an infra jump because you didn't know about the third decimal point.

Plus, I am fighting some MK targets that have been less than impressive. But I don't extrapolate their performance to the rest of their alliance.
[/quote]

Try harder bro.

90% of the nations at or above 1000 land have no navies as far as Fark is concerned. That also doesn't excuse their massive amounts of bombers. These are not generalizations - I'm really not reaching here :rolleyes:

(As a note, I did happen to apologize and eat humble pie as far as that Invicta nation is concerned, which I assure you most folks did not know either. After looking at your AA, I'm 100% sure that your alliance never got that memo. Again, props to them.)

Edited by Jake Liebenow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1340819970' post='2998483']
Try harder bro.

90% of the nations at or above 1000 land have no navies as far as Fark is concerned. That also doesn't excuse their massive amounts of bombers. These are not generalizations - I'm really not reaching here :rolleyes:

(As a note, I did happen to apologize and eat humble pie as far as that Invicta nation is concerned, which I assure you most folks did not know either. After looking at your AA, I'm 100% sure that your alliance never got that memo. Again, props to them.)
[/quote]


When did 8/23 become 90%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow this guy surrendered without firing a shot
[url="http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=484940"]http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=484940[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Vukland' timestamp='1340834309' post='2998736']
Wow this guy surrendered without firing a shot
[url="http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=484940"]http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=484940[/url]
[/quote]
musta been skared to fight without his moonbase...

rawr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1340819970' post='2998483']
Try harder bro.

90% of the nations at or above 1000 land have no navies as far as Fark is concerned. That also doesn't excuse their massive amounts of bombers. These are not generalizations - I'm really not reaching here :rolleyes:
[/quote]
Over 1000 land is not "stacks of land", and is in fact quite a significant generalisation. Whether or not an individual nation has a navy really depends on the cost/benefit to that nation. I would presume that alliances fighting in defensive wars would be more likely to have less navy due to the cost and NS inflation.

But please, continue your audit of Fark nations. I'm sure they appreciate advice from Deinos.

Edited by Sir Humphrey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='katashimon13' timestamp='1340840157' post='2998828']
[quote name='Vukland' timestamp='1340834309' post='2998736']Wow this guy surrendered without firing a shot
[url="http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=484940"]http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=484940[/url][/quote]

musta been skared to fight without his moonbase...

rawr
[/quote]

Or, she could be dealing with emergent pressing matters in another realm. The rest of us might be fleeing to the heavens and cowering in our titanium bunkers, but in this specific case, no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Gloin' timestamp='1340861288' post='2999147']
Also can someone please wake this guy up

http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=271889

I feel like this war would be more fun if people in Fark fought back.
[/quote]


You're just unlucky.

Edit: Wrong quote.

Edited by Elorian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Gloin' timestamp='1340861288' post='2999147']
Also can someone please wake this guy up

http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=271889

I feel like this war would be more fun if people in Fark fought back.
[/quote]

I'm not sure how active procrastinator is.

Otherwise, consider your wish granted.

Have fun! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...