Jump to content

Great Lord Moth

Members
  • Posts

    1,863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Great Lord Moth

  1. We were browbeaten by the missus. I like that explanation. :o You have already started a war elsewhere, and I realized it the instant I saw your post. Maybe we should've added a clause where you, in particular, agree to stop vandalizing the Baldr War page of the wiki. Your edits are both disingenuous and clumsy. >_>
  2. 1. New Pacific Order 2. Mushroom Kingdom 3. New Polar Order 4. GOONS(the first one) I don't have a 5th entry. I would put DBDC there, but I believe history is not ready to set their impact in stone just yet.
  3. Now now, that is not going to happen. We have an NAP, and the RIA doesn't violate treaties. Even back in the age where NAPs were changing from being a thing to being nearly non-existent, we never disregarded NAPs, we never declared war on an NAP partner due to superseding treaties. I don't think any alliance in CN will argue against the reliability of our word.
  4. Oh please. Besides, the point that most of us are making is that his lack of putting up is cause for him to be shutting up. You should be glad that even your enemies are calling him out on his BS.
  5. It was probably that. :P You know how diplomacy is. I don't think he was intentionally trying to mask the RIA's intentions, he probably just didn't want to say anything more than what needed to be said.
  6. That won't be necessary. I am of course referring to the logs, but I also have the added perspective of internal discussion. I will say that we were definitely not clamoring for peace with DBDC.
  7. Indeed. Even better is when they include unsubstantiated threats. *points at sig* :D
  8. Then give them to the RIA. You are acting as if months of fighting haven't happened at all. Why did you wait until now, two days after the very first alliance to recognize hostilities with DBDC signed an NAP? Why should any of us trust someone so ignorant of the political climate? I still don't buy it.
  9. You have no intention of giving anyone screenshots. I spent 1.5B fighting DBDC over the past month. I personally took over 30k nation strength off of a nuke turtle. There are several more in my alliance who can say the same. We've done our work. You have no intention of giving screenshots to anyone.
  10. Then you will give the screens to those alliances listed, yes?
  11. Guys. Listen. The ship has sailed. You should've started fighting DBDC a loooooooong time ago if you wanted to do anything about them. The easy fix is no more. All that is left is to extirpate the deeply-rooted political foundations they currently rest on. I don't know how to do that. Do you? Your speech was lifted from a famous poem that isn't just about the Holocaust despite that bring the original context. It's a warning to all people of the dangers of complacency, aimed most strongly at the time towards the Germans who obliviously stood by and allowed fellow Germans to be persecuted, tortured, and killed. I know you understand this, and I know you realize that it is explicitly appropriate for this discussion. >_>
  12. Well I hope you're not DBDC's foreign affairs guy, then. ;>_>
  13. I get the tactic, but it's too much to ask. The value of those screens will diminish over time as interest fades* unless he continues to release more for free. I mean, you're only tempted. I doubt you'd actually do it. *because people are stupid
  14. Sentiments like this are why I don't understand why DBDC isn't super-interested in setting things right with my alliance. >_> The RIA's entire existence has been an uphill battle, from the LUE raids to the first string of losing battles starting with GW3 to the Dave-Grudge War era to now. Anyway, on topic, You will find safety in an alliance willing to fight. You will find security in combat, whether you are defeated or victorious. This is the first condition for safety, for you will find that nothing can drive you to abandon your nation faster than seeing your most beloved alliance crumble to dust. When you are willing to give your nation for the good of your comrades, you will reap the benefits of that alliance's sound leadership and good fortunes. The safest place to be is in the alliance with the best leaders.
  15. Release it to everyone or I don't believe it for a second. None of this declare-on-DBDC or highest bidder bull****. I will not be swayed by baseless propaganda or snake oil. Alternatively, give it to the RIA because we already paid the blood price for it. >_>
  16. You've seen how we fight. You've seen our willingness to fight. You've seen our bile. And this is how you want to proceed with us? The NAP isn't to protect the RIA from DBDC, it's the other way around. It's the only reason we accepted this document(Sarkin can verify this). Your statement is that of one who wishes to further antagonize us. You have allies. I know you're capable of legitimate diplomacy. Instead of trying to ensure round 3 happens in August, why not [ooc]play this game as it was meant to be played, and take the far more interesting route of making us not want to fight you[/ooc]?
  17. One of my favorite things to do in the RIA is be a hardcore pixel-hoarder and refuse to fight throughout a bunch of wars and then surprise all my comrades by being really good at fighting when the time comes. ;>.> I was grinding the doomish nuke turtle the entire time I fought AB and GLOF, and by the time the war with Sarkin began I was fighting four nations.
  18. I approve of this message, because that whole "making the world tremble" angle fills me with pride for my own alliance. :D
  19. I know this to be true from personal experience. One of their nations is in the grinder. Surprise surprise, he's been nuke turtling the entire time. I hope he's having as much fun as we are. He probably could've done far more damage to us by not turtling, but you can't maintain damage ratios that way, m i rite?
  20. So the SuperCereal Coalition has taken about 25% more damage than the Lulism coalition so far. The only true winners are the dead. :(
  21. As someone whose family barely survived the Holocaust, the comparison doesn't bother me. It's wrong(and if we're being honest, not 100% wrong), but it's not offensive. If anything, the sheer frequency of the use of Hitler as worst-person-ever serves to do the opposite of trivializing his impact on the world. Like Hal said, it's a matter of scale.
×
×
  • Create New...