Jump to content

Gn0xious Jr

Members
  • Posts

    531
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gn0xious Jr

  1. [quote name='saxasm' timestamp='1284979002' post='2458832'] That took you a while to announce. [/quote] Well, there's the whole "elections" process, then there's the whole "elections results" process, and finally the whole "shamed throws out the elections, and appoints whoever he deems fit" process... it's all VERY time consuming
  2. after my other worldly duties have subsided, i felt it necessary to submit the following: o/ GR I miss Ilselu1 I hate Shamed Sal is back? Bart, Gears of War hopefully trained you well to be our MoD <3 PaulPig Seriously, Sal is back? Planet Bob: hopefully i'll be speaking with several of you more frequently than never
  3. i never understood the use of spying to catch spying. on several occassions spying was suggested, when evidence was produced, it was gathered by spying... i guess the alliance in the right is the one that finds out first? doesn't make sense to me...
  4. [quote name='Pyroman' timestamp='1282628993' post='2428993'] I wonder what it would be like if for once the actual instigators apologized for starting a war. Wouldn't that be something? [/quote] that WOULD be something to see! I'm glad that the war has stopped, but I'd have like to see a clean break. not force-fed one-sided accounts of what happened to provide false justification for the actions taken.
  5. it took too long to get nukes, for me anyway... and if i'm fightin' im'a gonna usem' also, The GRL cap should be raised, and a higher cap set. if that cap is hit, it'll cause a chain reaction that sends Bob into a nuclear winter. nations are decimated and as others have stated, warped into a primal world where they have to start rebuilding their nations from scratch.
  6. Greenland should be for GR... that is all...
  7. [quote name='RePePe' timestamp='1282344904' post='2425043'] This has devolved into arguing for argument's sake. [/quote] no it hasn't!
  8. [quote name='Randleman' timestamp='1282241960' post='2423295'] You mean Yellow fonts?! I guess that's why yellow makes me sad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhlWddAXSRA [/quote] you know what makes ME sad? YOU do, you jackwagon! LMAO! edit: on topic, i vote that using formatted text on alliance forums is a valid CB
  9. there really are degrees of annoyance/hostility here... low - one member from alliance A sending to a mass list, and a few members from alliance B get the message. medium - one member from alliance A sending to a mass list of nearly all of alliance B. medium-threatening - members (one or plural) from alliance A sending multiple mass messages to multiple nations of alliance B. threatening - members (one or plural) from alliance A sending condescending "you should move cause your alliance is inept" messages to multiple nations of alliance B. As you move through the scenarios, the annoyance level increases, and in my opinion can be considered harassment, an attempt to harm/hurt, and could easily warrant military action. As always, blah blah diplomatic solutions to every blah blah problem blah blah blah. edit: on starting your own alliance... even a group of 20 people could be considered "friends" but that is a huge chunk of NS to leave one alliance (if all leaving said alliance together). that's why you need to make sure that you hash things out with current .gov, and get their blessing... as long as everyone follows resignation protocols, i don't think it's an issue, though that existing alliance may not want to protect you or have a treaty with you.
  10. [quote name='LJ Scott' timestamp='1282086976' post='2420544'] Not re-rolling to begin with. Someone in NPO told me lead+pigs was a decent combo. [/quote] without lead, what are you going to slaughter the pigs with? :V
  11. i was only in Atlantis for 2-3 months before they disbanded, at the time i thought it was the only option and moved on... i'd liked to have seen, and been a part of, Atlantis' fight for survival...
  12. [quote name='Chron' timestamp='1282066614' post='2419903'] Actually the GATO cancellation and Omniscientone's motives behind it seem to be quite relevant to the Pacifican cancellation. So it's all quite good. That being said, I apologize for the response, all those double negatives tend to mix up the sarcasm's target. [/quote] no worries
  13. [quote name='Chron' timestamp='1282065919' post='2419879'] What talks are you saying didn't happen? I'd actually like to know what you're referring to us claiming so as to satisfy your curiosity. I don't believe any of us have claimed that talks did [i]not[/i] happen, rather that they did and we have provided proof that Omniscientone has spoken to us and wound up being caught in a self-contradiction? Further clarification is needed to know what this has to do with GATO's strained relationship with Pacifica leading to this cancellation. [/quote] i just caught up on the thread, read about omni's request for proof that NSO didn't receive intel before hand, and how it is pretty impossible to prove that something didn't happen... it doesn't have anything to do with GATO's strained relationship with Pacifica, when the train de-railed, i guess i simply pushed it further off the tracks?
  14. finally, something we haven't seen! gotta love me some fake DoW filled with .gov updates!
  15. NSO - I'm still awaiting proof to be provided that talks didn't happen. Until this isn't provided in a clear concise manner, I consider this matter open for non-review. I can't not hope that no logs aren't inclusive of said absence of discussion. What do you mean this is impossible???
  16. worst memory likely lies with my former alliance, Hyperion and the noCB war
  17. every nation is "open" to raiding, it depends on how attractive you make your nation to the raiders. if you decide to walk the world with big friends (join an alliance) a single raider is not likely to steal your stuff. if you walk into a dark alley, alone, flashing your Rolex and watching your iPad, you are more likely to get pummeled and lose your stuff. is it your fault he attacked? no, the decision to attack was on the aggressor could you have done more to make yourself less of a target? yes, you had several options. you chose not to use any of them. if you don't want to get bitten by a shark, don't dress up as the bait. hell, keep out of the water they live in altogether (unaligned).
  18. [img]http://i37.tinypic.com/2mpgz1d.jpg[/img] I'm probably somewhere around here
  19. i believe it is the amount of baw'ing around a CB that generally indicates it was "acceptable." the less amount of baw'ing the more generally accepted the CB is/was/is going to be...
  20. [quote name='Iosif' timestamp='1281686726' post='2414126'] It's more like five, really. [/quote] i was speaking about the cabin fever getting to us... between the voices in our forums and voices in our heads, it seems we should have more members
  21. yeesh, never a fun process of packing up and moving forums. hopefully it is all for the better, and you enjoy your new home
  22. yes/yes/no for shared reasons with those already posted... honoring the spirit of the treaty rather than the letter. respecting your treaty partner's request (if it's good enough) help rebuild.
  23. [quote name='Corinan' timestamp='1281370561' post='2407695'] I'd just like to add that recent events once again proof how badly Cyber Nations needs the News Sith Order. Yes, the war is bad for us, but it is good for the game as a whole. We will sacrifice ourselves to save the soul of Cyber Nations. We are your Savior, CN. Oh and GATO should disband. Yeah I couldn't give my honest opinion on them due to diplomatic reasons, but there ya go. They add nothing of value to the game. They're just flat out boring. [/quote] "...once again [b]prove[/b] how badly Cyber Nations needs the [b]New[/b] Sith Order..."
  24. looks like freedomfight3r and friends have been gettin' busay! <3
  25. [quote name='Dementual' timestamp='1281401467' post='2408739'] Another one of you people?[/quote] what do you mean "you people" ?
×
×
  • Create New...