montypython

I really wish this would have come like shortly after I had left so I could have said that it was because I left. It was because I left.

wow never thought I'd see someone say that. I hope it was a joke.

pretty sure I was 1+26, lol. Can you make a ranking of only defensive & only offensive?

cool beans. best of luck, HB.

Good luck Comrades.

GO GO HELP US PLEASE MK!

Umbrella is a boring alliance, who has an exciting alliance for me to join? Who is making things happen nowadays?

I'm surprised at how terrible we've become.

Best wishes to Argent moving forward.

[quote name='smurthwaite' timestamp='1349550932' post='3037980'] needs more montypython [/quote] the less people see of me, the better

We were at war?

I love being an MK toadie; I can't wait for the award ceremony.

HIDE YO KIDS, HIDE YO WIFE, CUZ UMBRELLA ROLLIN ERRYBODY OUT HERE

signatures only a mother would be proud of. gj NR

3m/150 for the rest of time!

[quote name='Axolotlia' timestamp='1328161414' post='2913024'] what were we thinking? [/quote] who are the basketball ninjas?

Cancel Deinos until Silver delivers sammiches to my nation's capital. Also, WickedJ, your accusations are thin-skinned and full of holes, like lace.

If only the people on that list were still in charge, CSN might be a respectable alliance.

Congratulations Hetman!

Mostly Harmless Alliance 5 Green Protection Agency 3 Fark 7 Independent Republic Of Orange Nations 4 Sparta 4 World Task Force 3 Orange Defense Network 5 The Order Of The Paradox 6 Umbrella 9 New Pacific Order 4 Global Alliance And Treaty Organization 4 Viridian Entente 6 The Democratic Order 5 New Polar Order 4 FOK 6 R&R 6 Mushroom Kingdom 6 Nordreich 3 LoSS 2 Nusantara Elite Warriors 2 The Legion 2 Valhalla 3 Multicolored Cross-X Alliance 2 Nueva Vida 3 The Foreign Division 3 Federation Of Armed Nations 7 NATO 4 Global Order of Darkness 5 The Grand Lodge Of Freemasons 5 Legacy 5 The Templar Knights 4 The Order Of Light 4 Asgaard 4 iFOK 6 Commonwealth Of Sovereign Nations 3 Athens 5 World Federation 2 Goon Order Of Oppression Negligence And Sadism 5 Fellowship Of Elite Allied Republics 3 Global Democratic Alliance 3 Argent 2 Guru Order 5 Christian Coalition Of Countries 3 Ragnarok 5 The Phoenix Federation 4 Random Insanity Alliance 7

Welp. I'm surprised you took the charter so seriously.

[quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1300383585' post='2667845'] But I'm not, we're giving you such a good fight you're trying to trick us into an unwanted peace before we can claim our victory over you. And yes, it was intentionally redundant to highlight a specific trait of fungi which all you fungi share in common, that being spinelessness. I however, am not a bird. Shaddup and keep fightin. You guys wanted everything to die, now we will give you your wish! Unless that is you all wish to surrender on our terms.. then we can talk. [/quote] I invite your governments to propose surrender terms to us. See what happens with them, because my bathroom is almost out of toilet paper and I could use some extra.

[quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1300382113' post='2667830'] If I'm whining about anything it's going to be about not being able to get a satisfactory war out of any of you spineless fungi! [/quote] LOLWUT You should be whining about how your very own alliance won't give us a good fight, because that is quite clearly the case. Also, the statement "spineless fungi" is quite redundant, you feathered bird.

[quote name='mhawk' timestamp='1300342732' post='2667304'] "If you want to state things like, DH is "erasing years of work from hundreds of players," then you should consider why these rulers of nations would state as their reasons for ruling their respective nations." You are trying to rationalize the damage you wish to inflict on players, by implying it will be fun? For whom? If that is the case then surely whatever caused you guys to become upset in the first place can be rationalized as "fun" from one side or another. I could ask umbrella to surrender to TPF. That could also be so easily accomplished... Just a few sigs and a post, everything is over right? Of course that won't happen the same way stating these terms could easily be executed if the other party just yields completely to your demands. It's really a rather weak argument you've created to try to justify your alliance's actions. [/quote] I'm only implying my own feelings that I, personally, would rather fight and lose, than sit in PM and have no respect shown to me. And yes, you could ask Umbrella to surrender to TPF, but the difference is that we are winning the fight, thus giving us the key bargaining chip in peace talks. I would also like to state that you completely skipped the whole bit about explaining our reasons for declaration to the uneducated masses.

[quote name='mhawk' timestamp='1300341663' post='2667243'] You'll note, "some on your side have said". I didn't claim you specifically stated as such. Your second sentence doesn't have a coherent thought to address so I'll skip it. I would however appreciate you posting the logs which you cite as provocation worthy of unending war or destruction of complete upper tier. I didn't start this war, you guys did. I think you'd have a hard time finding more than a sentence or two said about umbrella from me in the last year before you attacked our MADP partner. So raising questions is worthy of getting attacked again? Did I take this statement wrong? Please address it if I did and what you actually meant. [/quote] So by stating that you skipped my second sentence, you're stating that you don't care what the members of your alliance think about the war. I made up the part about there being logs, that was stated in humor. But I could probably get some logs of some NPO friends calling me names, and that would be sufficient for the cause. Although, I also stated that the reasoning for this war isn't understood by many "on your side" because those who understand it aren't willing to take some imaginary risk by telling their alliance our side of the story. You didn't start this war? Oh, my bad, I should have more clearly stated, here: "mhawk didn't start this war." Now, I wouldn't go as far as to state that raising questions is a worthy reason to be attacked, I simply stated that the tone of your statements shows that you have a negative attitude towards the peace which could be so easily accomplished. [quote name='Heft' timestamp='1300342197' post='2667283'] No, you're incorrect! (seriously, that's about as much of a response as I can get out of this since you didn't really say anything....) [/quote] But I did, as I more clearly stated above.