Jump to content

AAAAAAAAAAGGGG

Members
  • Posts

    653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AAAAAAAAAAGGGG

  1. I can't remember what war it was, but a lot of people qq'd when Umbrella declared a single war on an alliance without a DoW and it became an over 30-page complain-o-fest that we weren't utilizing the OWF properly. Hopefully this avoids that.
  2. Was hoping this was a DoW against NPL but this is a nice consolation prize.
  3. I think the point WorldConqueror is trying to make is that cheerleading posts are the worst. They add nothing of value, and all they really say is "I can't think for myself, therefore I am going to let others do it for me." You may as well just say QFT or emptyquote it at that point. [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1340417293' post='2993120'] Who the !#@$% cares if I'm adding a little or a lot? [/quote] Well, I'd say you don't add anything at all with posts like that.
  4. [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1340169418' post='2989803'] Do we even have actual members that small? tbh, I'm thinking he might actually be threatening to do us a favor and get rid of our tiny ghost problem. [/quote] This, too has been an issue for us! I'm liking where this is going.
  5. [quote name='King William' timestamp='1340071682' post='2988152'] This thread must continue. Most propaganda is horrible (and this thread is no different) but then you have those gems. And we certainly have a few here. [/quote] I think every war has tons and tons of terrible propaganda propagating from both sides with a few gems that pop up here and there.
  6. That was great timing on the birthday. Congrats gentlemen. We've had our differences, but I'm slowly coming around to TLR (at the urging of the dinosaurs, of course). Have fun with R&R.
  7. [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1340033294' post='2987682'] Umbrella should get their very high end nations to sell all their infra to lower their individual NS. Once they are in decent NS range they should wreck everyone with their tech advantage. Doubt they'd do it though. [/quote] It's an interesting proposition. However, infrastructure does give a soldier bonus, and we'd never win any GAs since our infra would be so lopsided. That's a significant amount of damage we couldn't do.
  8. Cool. Now how about those blocmates named Fark? Gonna defend them?
  9. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1339795815' post='2985198'] Heaven forfend you wait until you chain in, you might have to defend someone not called MK. [/quote] Because we're totally defending MK by hitting Fark, right? Come on, you're better than this.
  10. [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1339739662' post='2984589'] Very rude. [/quote] You guys never call anymore, seeing you would set off all sorts of emotions
  11. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1339738385' post='2984547'] I'm sure you could make it happen if you really wanted to [/quote] Yeah, but then we'd have to serve notice and actually talk to TOP, and ugh that's just not very fun!
  12. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1339738004' post='2984530'] Should have rolled TOP [/quote] [i]Technically[/i] we have an NAP with them.
  13. [quote name='Prodigal Moon' timestamp='1339736534' post='2984485'] How many Umbrella nations are even in range to hit Fark nations? This might be a pretty even match-up when you consider the actual strength that each alliance can bring to bear in the contested range. [/quote] Sadly, not as many as we hoped!
  14. [center][img]http://i.imgur.com/eGYis.jpg[/img][/center] Hello Gentlemen, There was a time when Umbrella was allied to the alliance of Fark. Time passed, then abruptly, Fark canceled on us. They believed in the lies of a man named Ramirus Maximus who tricked our internal affairs member into stating that the Fark treaty was a treaty of inconvenience. Suffice to say, we were upset. We tried to make amends but Fark thought we were too much and valued Ramirus over our friendship. Fark continued to act against our interests. For example, they used their lapdog Myth to probe us for intel, and kept getting their allies to guilt trip us into helping their coalition last war that we never cared for in the beginning. We put up with a lot of their crap, and it piled up over time, just like an overused erection joke. In the end, none of it was worth it, so welp. Don’t get us wrong, this isn’t our CB. We just don’t really like Fark much! Also, we feel bad that we never did get a piece of Fark last war. We’re making up for it. Sorry guys. Also, good job not going into peacemode; Paul Walker appreciates it. Umbrella hereby declares war on Fark. Signed, Domisi, President Threefingeredguy, Vice President Lusitan, Field Marshal Raken, Head Envoy Dylan Carter, Generator Illustrious, The Economist [center][img]http://i.imgur.com/Hrlbx.gif [/img][/center]
  15. The Dave War is still the best, sorry guys.
  16. [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1339647574' post='2982832'] I was rejected to Umbrella? Last time I was checked when I applied to Umbrella I was basically told I was accepted, yet I found a new alliance. Then thats when [s]Umbrella's[/s] CSM's hate came out towards me. Other than that... I do believe I was never rejected... [/quote] You had a boxxy avatar. You were automatically going to get rejected. This had nothing to do with CSM. We all didn't want you here.
  17. I could make a lot of comments about the war, but I'll just say I'm pretty happy and hail Dave.
  18. [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1339185805' post='2979536'] Haha. You're still buttsore about it. [/quote] The biggest betrayal in CN history that there were no amends for? I think people deserve a right to hold a grudge over it.
  19. [quote name='Stefano Palmieri' timestamp='1339122531' post='2979155'] Well this certainly brings out a lot of emotions. [/quote] Tell me more, you've got me all excited! But seriously, these Int guys are cooler than I originally thought. Maybe communism is the [i]right [/i]choice.
  20. [quote name='Stewie' timestamp='1338598931' post='2975948'] Nobody would let me roll the neutrals [/quote] Nobody's stopping you now!
  21. [quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1338439439' post='2975038'] No. [/quote] It's funny because you're dumb enough to think that getting OWF support will actually help your cause!
  22. [quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1338427882' post='2974889'] I didn't exactly state the reasons why I want to see it cancelled. Those remain private. I'll continue on though, doing my own thing. [/quote] And you'll continue to be a terrible representation of your alliance.
  23. [quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1338415656' post='2974726'] I also have a mind of my own and I say what I want, when I want. I do not support having a treaty with Deinos. The majority of TLR does so until it swings to my side, it's there to stay. [/quote] You do nothing to help your alliance by airing your own personal dirty laundry in public. Look, I get it - every alliance has members in it that disagree with the treaties they have. It's natural. Hell, my alliance has it too. But when you're a representation of your alliance as a government official, it just looks silly when you're sitting around shouting for a cancellation of one of your own treaties. Regardless of your allies' stature, calling for your own allies' cancellation on the OWF (especially as gov) is in extremely poor taste. You really ought to have more tact than that.
  24. This is the biggest argument over nothing that I've ever seen here. Bravo.
×
×
  • Create New...