Bordiga

Congratulations to The Javahouse League for making some new friends and to Anarchy Inc. for making some great friends.

I am very saddened by the passing of this great alliance. o/ Basketball Ninjas

[quote name='The Polemarch' timestamp='1352876509' post='3052209'] Yes, there are some pretty nasty ones in that list: "kill the neo $%&*s " "Hail satan" and "for the LSF and communism" The last one clearly revealing to the Cyberverse something that the enlightened of Xenios and the League already knew: the connection between communism and Bob's Jewry. [/quote] Yeah, leftists are against your anti-semitism, as displayed here: [url="http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?search=509115&Extended=1"]http://www.cybernati...9115&Extended=1[/url] "Harboring Jewish nations" "Bringing down Jewish Bankers" "Your AA harbours Jews" Good luck in your endeavours in this matter LOLman, though I don't think Israel is a very good representation of Judaism.

Congratulations to us, and tJL for being awesome people.

I'm sorry for being late also, but I love you guys and wish you the best of luck.

Congratulations to all involved parties. Invicta seem like fine folks and so do Arizonians, obviously.

Congratulations to us! Glad to be allied to such fine folks.

[quote name='Amossio' timestamp='1342093950' post='3009055'] you're a broken record sir, nothing more than a giant talking vagina. I didn't know Neat had their odp with PPO upgraded to a ODoAP, best of all is is GPF went in on a PIAT!hahaha this is great!!!!Have fun LoSS [/quote] While having the ability to read the wiki is a valuable skill, being able to read the treaties themselves is even better.. [quote= Pirates are NEAT treaty]AID [b]This clause gives both alliances the authorization to formally request military and/or financial assistance in any war against any other alliance or nation.[/b] However, once a request is made by one alliance, it is up to the other alliance to decide if they will grant the request or not. Should a request for assistance be denied, let there be no hard feelings. [/quote] [quote= Red Light Protection Force]III. Aid [b]In times o' need, we may request fer assistance from one another, be 't a rescue operation o' our lasses, or sharin' our lasses wi' each other.[/b][/quote]

Good luck to NEAT and the PPO in this endeavour.

Good luck to both sides. Very bad luck for TSI to be attacking BN in the first place though!

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1340780726' post='2998140'] 50 tech after the war says that MK takes actions now that reveal this war was never actually for Dave. [/quote] Who will rise to this challenge?

Legitimate CB's?? Where??

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1340686113' post='2996722'] By your comments I see you are a new nation and doesn't have any clue of what's happening, enjoy your awesome alliance. [/quote] Alas, while his nation might be new, Sovyet Gelibolu is not new to this world.

Don't be a !@#$@#$ idiot and assume that I care for either side in this struggle. The only moral position when GOD and NG fight each other is to grab the nearest box of popcorn and cheer. That doesn't mean that I shouldn't rightly point out how hypocritical this farcical topic is by Xiphosis.

I remember that Xiphosis pushed CSN into demanding those reparations, in fact he was the one who came up with the absurd "ODP's aren't treaties" line. And that people like yourself and Nofish argued the most against those who rightly saw that treatment of DT as despicable. I don't deny CSN was to blame, but GOD backed them all the way. The dishonesty of GOD members never ceases, does it? Never say what you actually think, just try to attack your opponent for some secondary issue. Is there a GOD debating handbook you lot all read from?

Um, ok SCY, I'm clearly drawing out the fact that the "that was four years ago, get over it" mentality only makes any sense if it wasn't that they still defend their past actions. Nofish should stop trying to act like I have an unreasonable perception of GOD, given they have never repudiated their own past crimes. Now we just have Xiphosis opportunistically talking about justice, truth and light because he isn't in the position where he could deliver the "justice" he would prefer. Only last year he was threatening Dark Templar with eternal war because ODP's aren't treaties. Only the wilfully blind can try to defend GOD. It is a constant source of despair to me that even those who haven't been in a position of dominance on Planet Bob for a while now, like MCXA for instance, try to use really quite pathetic means to discredit those who argue against whatever ally of convenience they happen to be shacked up with. Saddening.

[quote name='Emperor Whimsical' timestamp='1340675614' post='2996363'] The last time we demanded terms was in Karma. I'd like to point out our "machiavellan tech-raiders" haven't done serious raiding in literally years. Point at GOONS, NG, and MK for that. We are different, and if you got to know us, you'd see. But you won't. But thank you for proving my point. It is easier for you to hold a grudge than to resolve it. This is my last post here with you, it's pointless to argue with someone who doesn't understand the irony of calling someone stubborn while at the same time referring to a grudge from a DoW from four years ago. [/quote] I never even said you were stubborn. I said your alliance hasn't changed. I am "stubborn" because I am correct. Avoiding your own responsibility by talking about the actions of other alliances is a red herring, I think? And don't give me garbage about "getting to know you". You people never have ceased to defend your previous crimes, and your dictator Xiphosis, the person who actually matters in your alliance, never will because [b]he hasn't changed one iota[/b]. The only point I prove is that some people actually have a memory on Planet Bob and aren't shifted by rhetorical flourishes and outright lies.

Nofish, stop skirting the issue and just say you support disbanding alliances. Unless you have changed, then "four years ago" still applies. You were one of the foremost defenders of the actions of GOD at the time and ever since.

Obviously this isn't clear to you. The past actions of Xiphosis and GOD are not erased by them losing a small war to us. That might mean we don't seek revenge anymore. But what it doesn't mean is that GOD is suddenly not an alliance of machiavellian tech-raiders. The only way that GOD will change my opinion of them as scum is not losing a war but actually acting like they are different. But here we are again, still seeing GOD defend alliance disbandment on the basis of a CB with similar worth to "lol, Dave". GOD has not changed.

I guess a GOD member wouldn't be able to tell the difference between calling out hypocrisy and declaring war.

It's the best example, and it's what is relevant to me. And besides, here you are defending it. So... obviously still pertinent to any claims by Xiphosis to the moral high ground.

I don't think I have ever read any statement with less sincerity and more hypocrisy than what you just wrote, Xiphosis. For those who have no idea about anything, this is an example of the morality of Xiphosis: [quote]Yesterday we launched a preemptive war against the group calling themselves the League of Free Nations. This League, as their representatives have stated countless times in countless threads, is a self-defense league - both for participating alliances, and unaligned nations. Action is optional, but encouraged when it's politically or military feasible (see: CSE). Those of us who have run into these people before; be it GOD, FOK, or Avenguard know their tactics and know how they operate and this was nothing ground-breaking. When I'm contacted with information that a group is gathering in private around a man who's known for ordering hit-and-run attacks on people engaged in tech raiding, when I'm given a list of alliances involved in this group, and when I see their veteran members (Zanth had 900 posts and registered in June of LAST year) requesting sanctions against my members - it becomes my problem, and I deal with it. Some will undoubtedly ask - but why did you hit them all? Why not just The Corps, or just The Guard? Simple. As with other undesirable elements on Bob, the NONE groups have a habit of dropping their alliance affiliation, joining legitimate alliances, scamming aid, and then coming back out to do more hit-and-runs. I wasn't about to go in half-assed and give them that chance - if one of them was going to burn, they all were. Rosters for all signatories were drawn up, divided between the participating groups, a date was set and we went to town with a tomahawk. Some may think we went overboard, that's your prerogative, we felt the action was necessary and will continue in our course. [/quote] Xiphosis, defender of honour, decency, and the right for his members not be requested for sanctions after nuking their tech-raid victims. Burn in hell, you pig.

[quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1340528113' post='2994322'] The irony of what you post, lies in the fact that in the case of LSF, they kinda made the decision that Friends > Infra did not mean anything to them, or they would not put their allies in a death trap on a whim. But, hey, it only serves a purpose to someone's agenda, if it is LSF allies that are called out for lacking in the Friends > Infra department. Carry on. [/quote] This is a senseless statement, in that you allege White Chocolate has an "agenda" based on allegedly different perceptions of LSF actions versus those of their allies (INT in particular). Not only do you have no idea what you are talking about, in that you can point to no actual agenda, but no where has White Chocolate apologised for the obviously aggressive moves by LSF against NoR. The fact is that tR chose to intervene against a totally uncommitted alliance without any justifiable rationale whatsoever, choosing to side with the efforts of the MK-led coalition to crush Superfriends, an attack just as unprovoked as the attack by LSF against NoR. They made this choice, in favour of MK's unjustified aggression rather than LSF, despite the fact that LSF is actually suffering for their decision, and is actually a MDoAP ally of tR. This is a transparent breach of the idea that "friends" trump infrastructure. Such an observation is not based on any "agenda" except that one that so many alliances hypocritically purport to serve themselves, friends > infra.

Respect, Invicta. Too bad about the alliance you are defending.

I'm just putting forward a consideration LSF may have.