foxodi

ITT: NPO retakes the moral highground, even when they too are not fit to hold it.

If this holocaust you speak of is designed to destroy the world and rebuild the political landscape, I applaud it. But its just double-standards applied to an old enemy who has already paid for their sins, in order to remove a potential threat. Using such double-standards, you obviously believe you do not require any more political allies; in which case I look forward to the next several years as people move away from you and the next cycle of CN power-struggle commences.

[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1295706765' post='2591849'] NEW in relations with Razorade? Poor NEW. [/quote] This is what I'm thinking. Congratz to both

This is a good fit. Congratz to both International and C&G

War on an entire alliance for a rogue-incident that happens pretty damn often and is routinely concluded by diplomacy. Clearly a "might makes right" approach, on a rather defunct but peaceful alliance. Poor show.

Everyone likes the gutsy top-heavy alliance, but sometimes they turn out to be beyond foolish (nocb aggression), unreasonable (refuse diplomacy) and inconsiderate of their allies. Wise decision iFok, you had no other choice.

You got 5people on CN within 30mins and made them follow such simple commands. I am impressed NEW. But I'm gonna have to agree with Bob Janova here.

[quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1292913084' post='2547918'] [img]http://www.abtirsi.com/wardeclared.png[/img] I post this every war, yet it never stops being relevant [/quote] While I agree that is win, this may be one of the few times it isn't relevant - since there's alot of unification that it was blatant unjustified aggression.

Well goldie, people's opinions change as easy as the wind to suit their current situation. Warmongers want war, PC/iFok are standing in the way of a global war, so therefore we must troll them until they are shamed into making this global!

I laugh at those claiming "evil curbstomp!!!!". Like this is somehow worse then NEW raiding a recently disbanded AA that they knew was protected. NEW, karma war wasn't personal for DF - its a shame that you guys held such a grudge from it.

You are clearly just a warmonger. But we all are, so its okay.

ITT: People never seen Gundam 00 Totally agree with RV, doing the moral thing makes you disgusting.

Normally I mock NPO's propaganda pieces, but this satire is starting to bite imo. Truth hurts. QQing about lack of humor is pretty poor defensive tactic

A step in the wrong direction, though I'm sure you are all &*&^ing in the pants with Umbrella's posts in here Being eaten or disbanding are the only real choices. Does anyone even play Darkfall?

A difficult position you are in. Respect.

Old Guard, LoSS and Troy are black The Immortals are maroon Good job on the stats, cheers.

Onwards soldiers. Black Unity.

I was waiting for some noir declarations

[quote name='Chron' date='01 February 2010 - 03:59 PM' timestamp='1265003962' post='2149894'] it's not like context and past actions are at all relevant, right? Right? [/quote] In relation to this thread the only context that is necessary is our treaty with Aircastle. Everything else is irrelevant/offtopic.

[quote name='savethecheerleader' date='01 February 2010 - 02:59 PM' timestamp='1265000386' post='2149634'] Ah, I see. Well that clears it up quite a bit then. [size="1"]But I still disagree... so I must find a way to to criticize it... [/size] [size="5"]IT'S UGLY AND THERE IS A TYPO[/size] [/quote] For a 2min paint job I can accept this

[quote name='savethecheerleader' date='01 February 2010 - 02:45 PM' timestamp='1264999503' post='2149597'] I understand the general anti-Sith sentiment of the piece but... what? "Stronger then[sic] TOP"- In what way? "Creator of precedents" - which precedents would those be? What does either thing have to do with the NSO content? I suppose the piece is a success if its goal is to leave the viewer vaguely angry at the creator, but other than that... [/quote] Stronger then TOP is in reference to the countless posts by NSO that run along this line of thought here: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=79563 NSO has claimed in the past that it has set several new precedents; which is debatable

[img]http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/3299/cnprop1.jpg[/img] Paint. The best tool ever.

[quote name='Griff' date='01 February 2010 - 12:58 PM' timestamp='1264993101' post='2149220'] That was bad. I mean really bad [/quote] Not really, considering the entire thread NSO has been claiming we should have attacked them because TOP is clearly too easy of a target. NSO is either: Greatly overestimating themselves Greatly underestimating TOP Full of crap Take your pick

[quote name='Chron' date='01 February 2010 - 12:44 PM' timestamp='1264992294' post='2149188'] Pick a fight with a real man, then, SCM. I'm waiting for you to say something to me other than "no u". [/quote] Your butthurt (and ignorance, which is one and the same) is music to my ears. Don't ever change man.

I expect the 1 alliance to ignore the context of the fight for PR purposes. Furthermore I expected the alliance to realize that it was strictly business and no ill-will was meant. Unfortunately I still await the day for NEW to be respectful, such as TOP has shown here. But alas, the past shall be left there.