Xineoph

Kudos on the graphic choice and treaty; at the end, we all bow down to the Duke.

I'm gonna edit wind's post sometime this week. Gussy it up so to speak. For now, this is a Legion announcement that if you're not sure which alliance to choose from, remember that The Legion once created a subforum for one single members attempted dating life. See years worth of random dates, plots to get girls to breakup with their boyfriends, and drama that just didn't need to happen. Ah, and Eurovision rate threads. How many other alliances can say that? Message me for more details.

Congrats! o7 CCC & NATO

Love and emojis!

I came up with the name and demand credit on that! Also, Ave FTW!

I'm not even sure there are any 12 year olds playing this game anymore. They've all gone through college by now. Anyway, your CLAWS pick definitely fits the bill of what you needed.

Congrats, much love!

Active and Alive is probably one of the more depressing things I can imagine written. Bad Isty from a year ago. Anyway, here is Legions yearly bump of the day, combined with music coolness 😎 If you have any questions, pass them here or on our Discord.

Hey now, never give up. If you want to believe NG is part of Cobrasphere, you don't need a treaty for that. As long as you have your heart, you can conquer all other truths.

Much love to GATO and our very own not always happy, happy. :))

Much love to Saphyre, Grendel, and Magical Muslims for providing endless hours of entertainment. and yes Crym, it is Ave Legio, or you can use Legio Vult, whichever you like.

[quote name='The Great One' timestamp='1320235325' post='2837003'] NSO is reaching desperately and they appear to think this spin job is the best chance they have. If this was how it worked then once the main combatants peaced out everyone else in wars would just stop as they had no more reason to fight. While superficially accurate, they do almost all end up agreeing to white peace in many cases, or terms/reps in others. There is no de facto truce in place once the main combatants peace out. The war continues and it isn't a new conflict. Once you hit someone, regardless of the reasoning, you are in it until they agree to terms you set for ending it, or until you agree to the terms they set forth for ending it. They can set the terms however they wish, and they are not obligated to offer similar terms to all of their opponents. Regardless of how unfair you think you can play the terms off as. The war doesn't end until one sides terms are met, the losing side has far more incentive to acquiesce than the winning side, barring superb a super PR job or outside pressures. The PR spins NSO has tried have been pretty lacking, even for NSO. I say that as no fan of NSO throughout it's existance. You guys have even made me agree with Dochartaigh and Timeline. Dochartaigh and I don't get along well in alternate universes, and Timeline... he and I have never agreed as far as I can remember. I can't be bothered to read through to see if NSO is still pulling the "We are winning/We aren't losing" argument. If they are and if they believe themselves, why the implied threats of calling in allies? If you are winning then just keep doing so until Legion (Whom you despise if I am correct), has to ask you for terms. Let your deeds on the field of battle speak for you. Force Legion into submission and show all their words here to be baseless. Now if you know that that argument is just a bunch of hot air, sure you can call in RoK or others, it's as much an admission of defeat as the "S" word would be, in fact I would say it's worse as you are trying to fight it even as you admit it. But hey, if you guys think calling in allies to hit Legion will hide the disgrace you feel over losing to them then so be it. Get on with it. You're holding it over Legions head as if it were the Sword of Damocles, trying to pressure them into giving into your demands. For if they do not then *snip* there goes the string and the Sword (RoK) comes down on them. They don't appear to have budged at all. Even as much of fools as some of your allies (from my perspective) are I have trouble believing they are keen to jump into this to save you from your own pride and vanity. Best way out of this, meet the absurd, horrific, and utterly terrible terms Legion has given you. And yes, that was sarcasm. Now that all of course only applies if you actually want this to end. If you think that you can actually win a PR war preaching the absurd spins that you have tried to far as Legion pounds you into the ground then I suppose nothing can be done about that by anyone. It would make me sad. Not that you would care, probably even amuses you. But truthfully a lot of your posts are absolutely terrible and nigh headache inducing. The logic, while I can appreciate the effort you have put into trying to get these spins to work, is simply lacking. [/quote] There's no point reasoning with them, they want to live in their "NO YOUR NOT!" dream world. This war will go on as long as it takes, or we get bored after we ZI them all. Whichever comes first.

[quote name='magicninja' timestamp='1320032882' post='2835499'] Ha. NSO will never admit defeat in this if you ask me. Also, if you ask me, if Legion had tried pushing anything more than white peace on NsO and IAA, we would've rolled. Might be something Legion and their allies may want to consider. I don't know the Sith's allies' minds on this but you should ere on the side of caution methinks. We were all nice enough to not get involved, for the most part, and let you guys scrap it out...I wouldn't push my luck if I were you. [/quote] [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/lol1.gif[/img] I like your humour, keep it up and we might be friends in no time!

[quote name='Krunk the Great' timestamp='1319899882' post='2834437'] The odds were never even. BTA and IAA never fought [b]meaning their strength was a mere inflation[/b]. I can say they didn't fight because they [b]didn't[/b]. I know for sure 2.2 > 1.7. The fact still remains. You need to burn 2.2 mil to knockoff a comparable, or even slightly larger number from a coalition that is effectively half your size. This "Zomg IAA and BTA still declared war so they count" only serves to pad your ego against the inevitable: Your margin of "victory" is nothing more than pathetic considering a coalition half your size shouldn't be doing this much damage to you. I will say this again, since you seem intellectually incapable of comprehending this: Only alliances who actually contributed anything more than a token resistance count. Their addition to the war effort was like the effort of so many legionnaires:worthless statistic bloating. [/quote] Boy, what are you talking about? I went to war with the top 4 BTA nations and my strike partner the top 5. BTA may not have come to us, but we sure as heck came to them, took 2 PoWs and knocked out 50% of each of those nations NS, while sustaining minimal damage. BTAs elite fought. End of story.

[img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/awesome.gif[/img] o/ TLR! Love you guys! <3 [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif[/img]

[quote name='asawyer' timestamp='1318361638' post='2822990'] You realize the words "Paper Tiger" are not a compliment either, right? [/quote] You do realize it was a joke on you guys saying we sucked at war, right?

You kids are absolutely adorable.

[quote name='Charles Stuart' timestamp='1318215046' post='2821902'] Name of thread needs to changed from "Legion's allies" to "Legion's optional allies". [/quote] "Hereno's Fictional Penis" [QUOTE]Article IV: The Good Stuff Should one of the signatories be subject to attack, the New Sith Order and Tetris hereby agree to mutually defend one another by any means requested. This includes all manner of things like coalition channels, 3AM queries, and blaming Youwish. [B]Should one of the signatories be subject to attack for fighting due to the obligations of another treaty (which is unlikely because we're both bound to get rolled at some point for our own dumb actions), the mutual defense clause of this treaty will be considered optional.[/B][/QUOTE] "Amazonian Sith" [QUOTE]ARTICLE 3 Should either of these Signatories should be attacked, these Signatories are bound to aid each other reciprocally with their entire armed forces, and consequently not to make peace except conjointly and in concert. Either party may waive the defensive obligations of the other if they so choose. [B]Such mutual defense shall not be required, but is encouraged, in the case of one Signatory being attacked due to fulfilling the obligations of another treaty.[/B][/QUOTE] "The Terra-Cotta Pact" [QUOTE]Mutual Defense of the Brown Trading Sphere Should any signatory alliance be subject to an act of unwarranted aggression, the other signatory alliances are obligated to provide all reasonable assistance, both military or economic, [B]unless the assaulted signatory alliance is involved in the conflict via other treaties or through the actions of another bloc. In such a case aid is voluntary.[/B][/QUOTE] "The Fiery Sith Accords" [QUOTE]Article 2: War and Assistance Should either signatory be subject to an act of unwanted aggression, the other signatory is obligated to provide defense of the other through the use of military, political, and financial assistance, [B]unless the aggression is a result of other treaty obligations. In such a case, assistance is voluntary.[/B][/QUOTE] "Treaty at Bakura" [QUOTE]Article IV: Defense If another party takes aggressive action against one of the undersigned, the other shall be obligated to provide moral, diplomatic, financial, and military support as requested. [B]This obligation shall be considered annulled in the event that the aggressive action taken against a signatory was a result of another treaty obligation, and all provisions for support outlined in paragraph one will become optional.[/B][/QUOTE] [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/emot-v.gif[/img]

We already have a viceroy, his name is whiskey. o/

o/ and such

[quote name='Ironfist' timestamp='1317369008' post='2812602'] Has there ever been a pink sanctioned alliance? Except Sparta? [/quote] [font=arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif][size=2]LUEnited Nations as well, I believe.[/size][/font]

[quote name='Lord Fingolfin' timestamp='1316112041' post='2800946'] ffs, you sign this after I'm out of the Grand Chancellor position and can't do anything interesting. On the bright side I'm no longer in .gov so I don't have to maintain a facade of decorum and tact. Both of these alliances are horrible (outside of a few special individuals, <3 Xineoph) and after being privy to the breakdown of the relationship last time I am just...embarrassed for both of you. If in 6 months no war has broken out I will declare a holy crusade against The Legion and we can see how useful UPN actually is as a treaty partner. March 15th, 2012. Better start praying that Polar does something appropriately stupid again before that. [/quote] Oooh sweet, a forum mention. =D Also, Ave UPN and us, Haters gonna Hate and all that. I'm too tired to care about the rest of the message and the other negative stuff others wrote.

[quote name='Alexander Kerensky' timestamp='1310129574' post='2752365'] I am sure if this were real, I would have already ordered half of my AA into PM right? Alexander Kerensky Proconsul [/quote] Logistics are difficult. It will take us another week of preparation to run away, sir.

Congratulations guys, onwards to 2mil!

Unknown, Unknown and in a country that has Red, White and Blue in its flag. I can only hope the GB and Scouser are doing well in whatever they are doing and as for Carmen, I want my Diamond encrusted watch back.