mkoricic Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Most fail thread of the war... By far. 2nd was GDA's DoW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuMMyWoRm Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 I love the OP's nation info..... "Trying to get nukes, so I won't be in war mode for a while." Funny funny funny with 0.27 Tech and 1,169.60 infra yea that prob. is gonna take you "a while" to save for that MP. And in the year 2012 when u get it you'll have to save for 2 weeks just to buy a nuke. Better hope that guy your aiming it at doesnt have a SDI. Oh no! i missed! well 2 weeks from now when i get another one im gonna shove it up your..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 I love the OP's nation info..... "Trying to get nukes, so I won't be in war mode for a while." Funny funny funny with 0.27 Tech and 1,169.60 infra yea that prob. is gonna take you "a while" to save for that MP. And in the year 2012 when u get it you'll have to save for 2 weeks just to buy a nuke. Better hope that guy your aiming it at doesnt have a SDI. Oh no! i missed! well 2 weeks from now when i get another one im gonna shove it up your..... Rats. I completely forgot that it's going to take me 3 years to get nukes... Oh, that's right, it won't. Seriously, get the $%&@ out. You are no better than NPO if you are just going to sit there mocking me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raider Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Rats. I completely forgot that it's going to take me 3 years to get nukes... Oh, that's right, it won't.Seriously, get the $%&@ out. You are no better than NPO if you are just going to sit there mocking me. I'm sorry, but I have to point out that you're the one who made a thread saying you'd declare on Karma because of tech-raids against your alliance. When there really are no raids expect for one carried out by you against a none and one of your members is attacking a fellow alliance member. What else would you expect but mockery? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 I'm sorry, but I have to point out that you're the one who made a thread saying you'd declare on Karma because of tech-raids against your alliance. When there really are no raids expect for one carried out by you against a none and one of your members is attacking a fellow alliance member. What else would you expect but mockery? WOLF has changed their minds and will becoming a full alliance in a few days hopefully. We won't be choosing sides in the war. Instead, I believe we are going to be defending unaligned red from tech raids for the time period. And if you would have read some of my posts in this thread, I wouldn't have to explain us getting tech raided..... again...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 WOLF has changed their minds and will becoming a full alliance in a few days hopefully. We won't be choosing sides in the war. Instead, I believe we are going to be defending unaligned red from tech raids for the time period. Honorable. Wish you nothing but success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leprecon Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 WOLF has changed their minds and will becoming a full alliance in a few days hopefully. We won't be choosing sides in the war. Instead, I believe we are going to be defending unaligned red from tech raids for the time period.And if you would have read some of my posts in this thread, I wouldn't have to explain us getting tech raided..... again...... Though I doubt you will get far, I hope you make it. and I hope NPO allows it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wu Tang Clan Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 WOLF has changed their minds and will becoming a full alliance in a few days hopefully. We won't be choosing sides in the war. Instead, I believe we are going to be defending unaligned red from tech raids for the time period.And if you would have read some of my posts in this thread, I wouldn't have to explain us getting tech raided..... again...... Pass the Revenge of the Revenge Doctrine. Also, interesting to see how some members of "Karma" conduct themselves on the public forums. Remember what comes around goes around... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teriethien Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 WOLF has changed their minds and will becoming a full alliance in a few days hopefully. We won't be choosing sides in the war. Instead, I believe we are going to be defending unaligned red from tech raids for the time period.And if you would have read some of my posts in this thread, I wouldn't have to explain us getting tech raided..... again...... And how are you going to do that, with your super secret weapon that's only usable from peace mode? Sorry, but you're just asking to be mocked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobgoblin70 Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 WOLF has changed their minds and will becoming a full alliance in a few days hopefully. We won't be choosing sides in the war. Instead, I believe we are going to be defending unaligned red from tech raids for the time period.And if you would have read some of my posts in this thread, I wouldn't have to explain us getting tech raided..... again...... Will you be continuing you policy of raiding unaligned nations of colors other than red? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 Will you be continuing you policy of raiding unaligned nations of colors other than red? We haven't had a raid in over 100 days... We haven't been searching for one on purpose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobgoblin70 Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 We haven't had a raid in over 100 days... We haven't been searching for one on purpose. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...57162&st=20 Was the attack of Programming Woes on The United 57 States something besides a tech raid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...57162&st=20Was the attack of Programming Woes on The United 57 States something besides a tech raid? The United 57 attacked Jeepwrangler first. You must have overlooked that on purpose.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobgoblin70 Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 The United 57 attacked Jeepwrangler first. You must have overlooked that on purpose.. It clearly shows Programming Woes in the "war declared by" column. Looking through the thread I see no screenshot of The United 57 States declaring a war. If I missed it somewhere please point it out for me. I assure you it wasn't on purpose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wu Tang Clan Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 The United 57 attacked Jeepwrangler first. You must have overlooked that on purpose.. I really wish CN would go back to old school politics on how to handle things... I would totally support your cause if it weren't for several key elements in what you are doing here. So with that I took the liberty of making a guideline for you. How Not to Get Support from the CN Community: Make assertions in a combative manner Fly an avatar that people may find offensive Call anyone who challenges you wrong and resume combative manners Threaten people Threaten people with things you don't have Make assertions without any type of proof whatsoever Do not be respectful to people who disagree Do not thank people that do agree Go on endless tangents when approached with opposition use a "NO U" argument Make an argument against something that you yourself are or have been practicing Don't worry about grammar, it doesn't matter anyway You can take that list however you want to. But it really is meant to help you. I agree with your cause, just not how you're going about achieving it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) It clearly shows Programming Woes in the "war declared by" column.Looking through the thread I see no screenshot of The United 57 States declaring a war. If I missed it somewhere please point it out for me. I assure you it wasn't on purpose. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=281901 The war expired, but The United 57 declared war on him, thus I told a member of the alliance to support Jeepwrangler because Jeepwrangler had just gotten out of a war previously, was running out of funds and that's what people in an alliance just do. (He is still hardly able to support his nation at this point.) Wu Tang Clan, 1. Make assertions in a combative manner 2. Fly an avatar that people may find offensive 3. Call anyone who challenges you wrong and resume combative manners 4. Threaten people 5. Threaten people with things you don't have 6. Make assertions without any type of proof whatsoever 7. Do not be respectful to people who disagree 8. Do not thank people that do agree 9. Go on endless tangents 10. when approached with opposition use a "NO U" argument 11. Make an argument against something that you yourself are or have been practicing 12. Don't worry about grammar, it doesn't matter anyway 2. The avatar stays, and only those ignorant enough to not know what it stands for find it offensive; 4, 5. I said WOLF would attack in various ways, all of which we do have the ability to do; 7. How the hell can I be respectful to those who don't give respect first? Like in real life, I give respect to those who give respect in return; 11. We don't practice tech raiding anymore. I found another way to keep our alliance afloat, and we have tech raided a grand total of 3 times in over 200 days... it's not that great a number; 12. Well, in a forum, I can take as much time as I want to make a post. Therefore, I might as well use good grammar. (That's my thinking for all the forums I use.) Meh, I know it's supposed to help, but some of the pointers don't make sense. Of course, some of them never will to me. (But that's just me.) Edited May 11, 2009 by A Lone Stranger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobgoblin70 Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 As you seem to want to make this confrontational, I see no evidence of you nations being attacked by anyone but yourselves. Your posting in this thread has made your word that it happened carry very little weight. http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=281599 The United 57 States has a grand total of 382 attacking casualties. Every bit of evidence suggests that it was Programming Woes that stared a tech raid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Termy Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 even if people know what your avatar stands for and the history behind it they can still find it offensive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 As you seem to want to make this confrontational, I see no evidence of you nations being attacked by anyone but yourselves. Your posting in this thread has made your word that it happened carry very little weight.http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_d...ation_ID=281599 The United 57 States has a grand total of 382 attacking casualties. Every bit of evidence suggests that it was Programming Woes that stared a tech raid. It could have been his first war. And he never replenished his soldiers after we had another nation declare on him, so once he was down to 10 soldiers, we couldn't attack him anymore. And if it was his first war (which it could have been), then he wouldn't show as losing too many soldiers. 'ey? even if people know what your avatar stands for and the history behind it they can still find it offensive It's sad that people can ignore history like that.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Termy Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 (edited) it just depends on your heritage - some it stands for oppression other its their homeland - i could care less considering i grew up with it Edited May 11, 2009 by Termy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 it just depends on your heritage - some it stands for oppression other its their homeland - i could care less considering i grew up with it It stands for state's rights and standing up for what you believe in. I realize that there are those [completely evil and idiotic] people who use it for... other... things... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllenKalashnikov Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 A Lone Stranger Please Request a lock on this Topic b/c you have stated what you came here to state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 11, 2009 Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 A Lone Stranger Please Request a lock on this Topic b/c you have stated what you came here to state. This is no longer possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Stranger Posted May 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2009 This is no longer possible. Trust me, I would have a long time ago if it were. But all my previous requests have been denied.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teriethien Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 It could have been his first war. And he never replenished his soldiers after we had another nation declare on him, so once he was down to 10 soldiers, we couldn't attack him anymore. And if it was his first war (which it could have been), then he wouldn't show as losing too many soldiers. 'ey? What are you talking about, that in no way explains why you have a member of your alliance tech raiding another member of the same alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.