zenergy Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 GUN was happy to keep to these terms, but WAPA insisted on breaking them multiple times. Each time, you'd claim you'd give your members a stern talking to, but you obviously aren't in control of your membership. Between this and your supposed not being aware of 1TF's bandwagon train, I'm really starting to wonder about WAPA - you guys doing okay over there? If you want to get out of all this, just talk to us. Surrender terms will be reasonable and fair; we're nice folks when you're not launching nukes at us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 lol, asking WAPA to surrender someone's arrogant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 1 nuke, 2 nuke, 3 nuke, 4... That is what the red button's for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Auctor' date='11 February 2010 - 12:31 AM' timestamp='1265812277' post='2172563'] lol, asking WAPA to surrender someone's arrogant. [/quote] Have you seen their stats? Plus, it's not like they didn't bandwagon on us using an oA treaty . They can get out any time they want. We won't be imposing harsh terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayzie Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='zenergy' date='10 February 2010 - 02:22 PM' timestamp='1265811777' post='2172554'] Between this and your supposed not being aware of 1TF's bandwagon train, I'm really starting to wonder about WAPA - you guys doing okay over there? If you want to get out of all this, just talk to us. Surrender terms will be reasonable and fair; we're nice folks when you're not launching nukes at us. [/quote] I love the name, the 1TF Bandwagon Train. Back at you, I'm sure the alliances at war with you will be more than happy to offer you nice surrender terms. Come hit any of us up when you're ready and we'll sort something out. As for the topic of nukes, let em fly WAPA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='R3nowned' date='10 February 2010 - 10:11 AM' timestamp='1265814686' post='2172600'] Have you seen their stats? [/quote] there's no saving you, is there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Fingolfin Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Non nuclear wars are for pansy !@#$%*es Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Auctor' date='11 February 2010 - 01:16 AM' timestamp='1265814964' post='2172612'] there's no saving you, is there? [/quote] What, what am I doing wrong? There's no need for WAPA to be losing that NS is what I'm saying. Obviously, they'll keep losing it until they surrender, or we surrender. Which ever comes first. Edited February 10, 2010 by R3nowned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieG Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 (edited) Non-nuclear war is sooooo 2006! Epecially in Global war, glad you finally caught on. Enjoy pushing that red button Edited February 10, 2010 by StevieG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trout Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 (edited) WWPA were foolish to even think that this war was going to stay non-nuclear. Should have used them when the 25 hours were up. I know that's what I did early this morning. Edited February 10, 2010 by Boogeyman657 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Boom sticks are fun and should be used at every opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hassman Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Skippy' date='10 February 2010 - 10:18 AM' timestamp='1265797114' post='2172394'] The time where "Nukes were a weapon of last resort" is long gone. I'm amazed you still followed that old "tradition." WAPA needs to modernize :| [/quote] Yea we have been so lucky in our last wars with no nuclear deals ^^. [quote name='Salmia' date='10 February 2010 - 01:55 PM' timestamp='1265810147' post='2172530'] I sure you are Kilkenny. But yeah, I am surprised WAPA tried to do a no nuclear war, I can respect you for that but those days are long past. To get anyone to agree to that is indeed very hard considering nukes have been flying since war was first declared. [/quote] It's our charter. We actually really haven't thought of it for a while. [quote name='R3nowned' date='10 February 2010 - 03:28 PM' timestamp='1265815733' post='2172629'] What, what am I doing wrong? There's no need for WAPA to be losing that NS is what I'm saying. Obviously, they'll keep losing it until they surrender, or we surrender. Which ever comes first. [/quote] Hey, were not stat lovers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpcurley Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='R3nowned' date='10 February 2010 - 10:28 AM' timestamp='1265815733' post='2172629'] What, what am I doing wrong? There's no need for WAPA to be losing that NS is what I'm saying. Obviously, they'll keep losing it until they surrender, or we surrender. Which ever comes first. [/quote] You are in NATO govt? Because if you are thats just hilarious. Going about surrendering in such a tough guyish arrogant way. WAPA will never surrender to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgregory Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Warz without nukes is blasphemy!! Nukes are an admin-given right and admin would want us to use what he has blessed us with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Let this be a lesson to all non-glowstick friendly outdated agreements and rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popsumpot Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='kpcurley' date='11 February 2010 - 02:02 AM' timestamp='1265817753' post='2172679'] You are in NATO govt? Because if you are thats just hilarious. Going about surrendering in such a tough guyish arrogant way. WAPA will never surrender to you. [/quote] It would be good next time if you could, you know, actually [i]check[/i]. He's not NATO govt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lusitan Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='andymac64' date='10 February 2010 - 09:38 AM' timestamp='1265794724' post='2172367'] When TFD entered we offered the same terms. TFD refused and since then we have been happily eating a breakfast of a nuke from TFD followed by conventional attacks from NATO and GUN. Quite a painful way to start the day. [/quote] We are sorry for that, but considering accepting that agreement would be a suicide declaration. WAPA top nations outmatch us in infrastructure levels. Fighting only conventional wars would be impossible for us. On the other hand, we outmatch WAPA in tech per capita and WRCs (difference of 11 if I recall out of 18). Adding to that, WAPA's warchests - or lack of - make them fine targets to be put in bill lock through Nuclear Anarchy considering some of the nations with >12k infra have less than 10 million stored. It is therefore in our best interest use nukes against you instead of allowing you to punch us to dead with your inflated numbers. When the choice of either being beaten to death or nuking you so we can have an advantage this war is presented to us... well, the answer is obvious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andymac64 Posted February 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='Lusitan' date='10 February 2010 - 08:56 PM' timestamp='1265835394' post='2173127'] We are sorry for that, but considering accepting that agreement would be a suicide declaration. WAPA top nations outmatch us in infrastructure levels. Fighting only conventional wars would be impossible for us. On the other hand, we outmatch WAPA in tech per capita and WRCs (difference of 11 if I recall out of 18). Adding to that, WAPA's warchests - or lack of - make them fine targets to be put in bill lock through Nuclear Anarchy considering some of the nations with >12k infra have less than 10 million stored. It is therefore in our best interest use nukes against you instead of allowing you to punch us to dead with your inflated numbers. When the choice of either being beaten to death or nuking you so we can have an advantage this war is presented to us... well, the answer is obvious [/quote] And we are not compaining. Actually, this is much easier. Enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 [quote name='kriekfreak' date='10 February 2010 - 09:44 AM' timestamp='1265795049' post='2172369'] What did you expect really? Always nuke your enemies. [/quote] I feel like gagging because I agree with this. FYI: When you make a deal not to nuke its your allies who eat their extra nukes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldr Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 [quote name='erikz' date='10 February 2010 - 06:26 AM' timestamp='1265804768' post='2172470'] Not using nukes is disrespecting towards admin. We should use all admin-given features. [/quote] I nominate Erikz for the "Incite Religious Propaganda" function. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desperado Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 I'm sorry, I must have missed the cancellation clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathias Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Why weren't you nuking to begin with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ying Yang Mafia Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 WAPA I hope to God I never need you to come to my defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baskan1 Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 [quote name='Ying Yang Mafia' date='10 February 2010 - 10:06 PM' timestamp='1265861178' post='2173862'] WAPA I hope to God I never need you to come to my defense. [/quote] Why not we love you WAPA HUGGLES ATHENS hehe and everybody this is my official song!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnupL42gmF4 MWAHAHA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhawk Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 [quote name='baskan' date='10 February 2010 - 08:07 PM' timestamp='1265861271' post='2173865'] this is my official song!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnupL42gmF4 MWAHAHA [/quote] In light of this new evidence The Phoenix Federation would like to issue a formal apology to the world community for the war crimes we are actively committing against WAPA gov. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.