Jump to content

An Announcement from the Mostly Harmless Alliance


jadoo1989

Recommended Posts

Which part of this particular treaty did you feel was too rigid or written in a way that meant it was bound to fail?

I can't seem to find the protectorate, the DoE only has the OoJ charter on it.

If you have it I'd like to read it though.

Regardless, my comment was mostly directed at the attitude towards protectorates and protectors lately and not solely towards MHA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can fully understand OoJ's feelings about this, and I wish them good luck.

AFAIK our problems with them were not related to any terrible trouble, but they are just connected with the specific demands we have towards our protectorates - demands that evidently weren't met. Another protector can sign a treaty with them with little fear of getting into something "nasty".

I.e.: don't take this cancellation as a sign that OoJ are "bad people", or anything like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerdge is right, we bear no ill will toward OoJ and wish them and NV well.

It is much appreciated.

Likewise, Nueva Vida reciprocates a feeling of no ill will towards the Mostly Harmless Alliance. Their position is completely understandable, and it is not in spite of the Mostly Harmless Alliance that we take on the Order of Justice as a protectorate, but rather in hopes of redemption for the Order of Justice.

I highly respect the Mostly Harmless Alliance's decision, and wish them all the best in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...