The AUT Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Are you kidding me?We may have had our disagreements, AUT, but you've encaptured the Stickman spirit right there. I understand what you're trying to do, I just don't like you're doing it to my friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Purple is the new lolpink? Just wait for the DoS'es, then it'll all be set. I understand what you're trying to do, I just don't like you're doing it to my friends. Awwww. /me huggles AUT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingoist Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Nor do yours.You claim Purple is being cowerdly and I am showing everyone that we dont have reason to be. and yet they still are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 I wonder whether Stickmen would be acting the same way if they didn't have bigger friends standing behind them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingoist Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 I wonder whether Stickmen would be acting the same way if they didn't have bigger friends standing behind them. would we still be having fun and going about our business in the game the way we please? aboslutely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Soviet Attack Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 I wonder if Invicta wouldn't have already attacked us for the transgressions they now play off as meaningless, were it not for the allies we have. Accusations of cowardice can go both ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shovel Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 (edited) I wonder if Invicta wouldn't have already attacked us for the transgressions they now play off as meaningless, were it not for the allies we have. Accusations of cowardice can go both ways. No, no, Invicta aren't attacking us because of the allies they have. (And no, I am not saying Invicta's allies are small and weak etc.) Edited October 24, 2009 by Shovel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryievla Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 a very clever and backhanded way of saying that you wouldn't have made changes for us. you never wanted our support or our participation or our membership in your precious unity unless it meant that you could control us and what we do. that is a fact. We don't try to control anyone in our bloc or on our sphere. Our alliances have differing opinions, just like most other spheres. We don't have all the same allies & friends, nor do we even have the same political views. We don't even have a common view on practices like tech-raiding & aggressive wars & all that. We are bound together by nothing other than mutual respect & the color purple. It's not about what you can control, it's about what you can unleash. * I for one would welcome your participation in PEACE, even if you choose not to apply for membership. We made changes for folks that aren't even in Poseidon; can't see why you think we just wouldn't for you. As far as the messaging thing, while I am Valhalla government, I can't really say how we think or feel about it. We haven't really talked about it, cause most of us don't care My personal opinion is that it wasn't polite to Avalon, but you guys didn't know that. And it's just a message, nothing to get bent about. I just figure it's a sign that we need to get our senate stuff together better, is all. Were it me that sent them, I would have apologized to whoever got offended, and not done it that way again, but that's the beauty of freedom & sovereignty; we all do things the way we want, not the way other people want. Anyways, I don't know the Michael fella, but Stetson is a cool guy, easy to work with, and quite pleasant and bright and fun. I'd like to counter-endorse with Stetson of Axeland, for purple senate * (Yes, stole that quote; it's my absolute favorite. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 I wonder if Invicta wouldn't have already attacked us for the transgressions they now play off as meaningless, were it not for the allies we have. Accusations of cowardice can go both ways. That's true. But the current under dog, the person being harassed and provoked. Tends to garner my sympathy more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Soviet Attack Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 No, no, Invicta aren't attacking us because of the allies they have. (And no, I am not saying Invicta's allies are small and weak etc.) Invicta could take Stickmen without outside assistance if it were so inclined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Why does Invicta attacking Stickmen keep getting brought up? It's not happening. Yes, tempers flared, it happens, but Invicta has absolutely no plans to go to war with Stickmen. It would just be the pinnacle of idiocy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum T. Gundraw Posted October 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Why does Stickmen attacking Invicta keep getting brought up? It's not happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 It makes me laugh to see so many from the Karma side who think the kind of behavior that was once attributed to Hegemony is now acceptable and to be encouraged further because its someone from the Karma side is doing it. Im surprised to see it coming from Citadel though. Tell Invicta to stop threatening them. Oh you say it was a misundertanding and one member who isn't Invicta govt? I see. So when it's a member of Invicta and a purple senator making veiled threats and such, it's meaningless because it's a member who holds no power...but when it's a MEMBER of a single alliance comprising the whole os Citadel...they speak for Citadel. Got it. Hypocrisy ftw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Blake Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Can you guys just skip to the last Act? This whole drama is getting tiring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porksaber Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Can you guys just skip to the last Act? This whole drama is getting tiring. who not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Invicta doesn't make veiled threats. You can ask Terry Howard. I'm direct. Apparently I have injured some of your feelings, and for that I apologize. But I don't mince words. If I wanted us to attack you, you would have been told that in unmistakable words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Invicta doesn't make veiled threats. You can ask Terry Howard.I'm direct. Apparently I have injured some of your feelings, and for that I apologize. But I don't mince words. If I wanted us to attack you, you would have been told that in unmistakable words. The way the world functions? Yeah, somehow I doubt that. My guess is you'd continue the game you're playing with them until you could drum up support for a war, and then spring it on them. No one EVER says "I'm going to attack you" and means it, atleast on an alliance scale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Soviet Attack Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Invicta doesn't make veiled threats. You can ask Terry Howard.I'm direct. Apparently I have injured some of your feelings, and for that I apologize. But I don't mince words. If I wanted us to attack you, you would have been told that in unmistakable words. No, you're a !@#$%^&*ter. We know exactly what you wanted to do, so don't bother with this line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 The way the world functions? Yeah, somehow I doubt that. My guess is you'd continue the game you're playing with them until you could drum up support for a war, and then spring it on them.No one EVER says "I'm going to attack you" and means it, atleast on an alliance scale. We did. The Illuminati are gone now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Invicta doesn't make veiled threats. You can ask Terry Howard.I'm direct. Apparently I have injured some of your feelings, and for that I apologize. But I don't mince words. If I wanted us to attack you, you would have been told that in unmistakable words. Hahaha, how can I ever take you serious after this crap? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Both are asking them to disobey orders from their alliance command.Well, unless the alliance doesn't control who its members declare war on. I suppose such an anarchist alliance could exist. Already replied to here. Some alliances use volunteer militaries, Tromp, especially when it comes to rogue response. You could certainly send a request to attack someone. I don't think this would be kosher either, though. I wouldn't care if you'd send me a request to attack someone. I'd ignore it. Simply because my loyalty lies with my alliance, not with that of yours. It's funny to see you questioning your alliances members loyalty though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 (edited) Well... Ask Jonte. At least that's what he said. Erm... First of all, I have never heard of this idea. I personally like it though. Second, Jonte can't speak for FOK. Only FOK gov members can, don't you think so? edit: third, FOK would have nothing to do with it. Edited October 24, 2009 by Tromp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Erm...First of all, I have never heard of this idea. I personally like it though. Second, Jonte can't speak for FOK. Only FOK gov members can, don't you think so? edit: third, FOK would have nothing to do with it. Jonte relayed information to us. Instead of asking people who evidently do not trust me to believe me, I suggested they should ask him directly instead of getting it third-hand from me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Awwww. /me huggles AUT. /me slaps Locke around a bit with a large trout. you disappoint me yet again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted October 24, 2009 Report Share Posted October 24, 2009 Jonte relayed information to us. Instead of asking people who evidently do not trust me to believe me, I suggested they should ask him directly instead of getting it third-hand from me. Right. Then don't talk stuff and nonsense as you did here: We tried that, but FOK said no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.