Shovel

Come at me. It's been interesting. Will defo miss our past times though.

[quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1294077596' post='2562071'] Heh, nice. What color will you be on? [/quote] Definitely pink, maybe grey actually.

[quote name='Hyperion321' timestamp='1293227965' post='2552939'] Because Fark really expected PC to take advantage of their kindness right? This is underhanded manipulation of an agreement in good faith, and these rogues will be beaten to a pulp for it. [/quote] Yes, it is very underhand to honour agreements and attack an opposing force 4...5x larger. Also what are you on about? PC have not gone back on any agreements they made.

[quote name='Finnish Commie' timestamp='1293124940' post='2551707'] Only problem I have with bunch of you going rogue and attacking "Fark & co" is that Fark is the one who is forced to take the heavy hits. INT and TPE lack capabilities to fight nations the size who have lately joined the war out of their own sense of pride or blood thirst. Not to mention this will just prolong the time the general NEW membership will have to fight when you keep bumping their NS with fresh troops. INT isn't going to stand down, no matter how much your kind stacks NEW's AA and I am fairly certain that goes to my compatriots at arms too. I am hopeful in the end all the rogues assisting new will get what is due to them. [/quote] It seems Int lacks the capabilities to fight full stop.

Quality, not quantity.

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1292970728' post='2548764'] Its not the first time PC has tucked tail when the odds didnt look good. [/quote] I'm trying to think of another time, but I can't. Care to enlighten me?

[quote name='SpiderJerusalem' timestamp='1292857498' post='2546556'] Feel free to follow your treaty and gain some lost respect [/quote] Oh, don't worry, I will.

Pathetic. I thought our treaty said "defend" not "let burn".

Much respect NEW. Stick to your guns.

[quote name='Sentinal' timestamp='1284744198' post='2456683'] You guys cancel a treaty and then a month later re-create it? [/quote] *Rok recreates.

Thank god this isn't real!

[quote name='michaeru' timestamp='1283368222' post='2438399'] Is this from the people who call for us to do something about it (it in this case being you) at every turn or am I confusing you guys? You are all so interchangeable, it's hard to keep you apart. [/quote] But I am doing something!

[quote name='EgoFreaky' timestamp='1280752643' post='2398300'] Yes.. damn infra huggers and statwhores that we are [/quote] Yeah, because you have to be 'infra huggers' and 'stat whores' to get annoyed when you lose NS. Does anyone in R&R have any form of intelligence?

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1280743018' post='2398222'] Oooo a cliffhanger. Will we find out next week? [/quote] R&R just got pissed with losing NS, something like that. Typical R&R.

Oh god. D:

[quote name='Haflinger' date='27 June 2010 - 05:43 PM' timestamp='1277656979' post='2351952'] Huh? Quote me saying that. I took plenty of damage, put out plenty more, and absorbed it and rebuilt - because I had enough warchest. Before the war, Arexes had roughly twice my infra. Now things are a bit different. [/quote] I have done already but if you really need me to point out your contradictions again I will do... [quote]All I stated was that I got triple-teamed unnecessarily, entirely by small iFOK nations which stood absolutely no chance of doing damage to me, except for nukes and CMs. Heck it was because of the triple-team that I got out of my zero land situation. [/quote] You got triple teamed and took little damage even gaining land from them. However! [quote]Are you really kidding? I fought six on one for a week (five of my opponents had WRCs; I was nearly at zero land afterwards), and then was triple-teamed for the rest of the war. During this one single alliance war, I got roughly seven times as many casualties as iFOK's #1 nation has acquired in its 904 days of existence. At my low point, I was at 1.4K infra. I rebought to 2K infra multiple times during my first week in order to preserve my navy.[/quote] Here we have you trying to play the poor little boy who got bullied and beaten (by the same people you first said caused little damage). Which one is it?

[quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' date='26 June 2010 - 03:05 PM' timestamp='1277561128' post='2350946'] To be fair there wasn't anything he could do to prevent that. Being on the losing side doesn't necessarily mean you're awful at war. It's a numbers game coupled with activity. If you're active you'll dish out damage, if you're on the winning side, you'll dish out even more. Nearly everyone gets wrecked, but those with a warchest recover to fight another day. There's no finer example than Matt Miller. [/quote] Well done. However, others do not come out and one minute say they took hardly any damage and the next say they fought valiantly for the cause until their final breath.

[quote name='Haflinger' date='26 June 2010 - 12:40 AM' timestamp='1277509239' post='2350463'] You guys did enough gather intels on my nation. Yes, I fought - I didn't just sit in dove. I took a pretty major NS hit from lost infra and land during the war. [img]http://web.me.com/danflemming/cn/llonach_chart.png[/img] That was my chart on February 27th. But I never got close to running out of warchest. At the end of the war I still had more cash left than any of my opponents had had when their wars started with me. [/quote] Okay that's great. But your nation still got wrecked? Thanks for clarifying that one.

[quote name='Haflinger' date='26 June 2010 - 12:29 AM' timestamp='1277508539' post='2350453'] You know, after the war was over, I had warchest left over, and rebought infra. You don't do that? [/quote] That isn't what you said...which one is it? [quote]At my low point, I was at 1.4K infra. I rebought to 2K infra multiple times during my first week in order to preserve my navy.[/quote] or... [quote]If you think my nation was wrecked, you really weren't paying attention to the war reports.[/quote]

[quote name='Haflinger' date='24 June 2010 - 11:40 PM' timestamp='1277419210' post='2349204'] If you think my nation was wrecked, you really weren't paying attention to the war reports. Hilariously, I now have more infra than you do. [/quote] [quote name='Haflinger' date='25 June 2010 - 04:18 AM' timestamp='1277435862' post='2349532'] Are you really kidding? I fought six on one for a week (five of my opponents had WRCs; I was nearly at zero land afterwards), and then was triple-teamed for the rest of the war. During this one single alliance war, I got roughly seven times as many casualties as iFOK's #1 nation has acquired in its 904 days of existence. At my low point, I was at 1.4K infra. I rebought to 2K infra multiple times during my first week in order to preserve my navy. [/quote] So, wait, which one is it? This couldn't possibly be Haflinger making up rubbish to suit his argument?

[quote name='Haflinger' date='22 June 2010 - 11:01 PM' timestamp='1277244073' post='2346983'] You're not [i]that[/i] silly. [/quote] We know we're not silly; still we don't have a clue what you are rambling on about.

[quote name='mdnss69' date='11 June 2010 - 02:38 PM' timestamp='1276263521' post='2333198'] iFOK - Never met them, but they don't seem to like me I hear, so I don't like them. 3 [/quote] Who are you?

Oh noez.

[quote name='Arrnea' date='12 April 2010 - 01:19 PM' timestamp='1271074745' post='2257280'] Well, I guess that just puts to paper what has been true for a long time. Can't say I'm surprised to see this happen. [/quote] Do you have some kind of obsession with iFOK? You seem to be fixated with us.