lamuella Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 CAMEO APPEARANCE! I'll put my mushroom in your kingdom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x8BitL0gic Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 High five for being hilarious. Can I have some ice-cream cake now? o/ GOONS o/ NpO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamuella Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 High five for being hilarious.Can I have some ice-cream cake now? o/ GOONS o/ NpO you get two slices for having a renee montoya avatar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave93 Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 shouldn't your mutual aggression clause be optional aggression because Article IV: Mutual AggressionShould either signatory find it necessary to commit an act of aggression upon a third party, they may request military support from the other signatory, though this request is under no circumstances an obligation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 shouldn't your mutual aggression clause be optional aggression because the request isn't an obligation. That means we're not obligated to request their help in an aggressive war and vice versa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melint Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Nice announcement, congratulations on all counts. o/ NpO o/ GOONS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernkastel Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Congrats on the treaty, milestone and elections. Very nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamuella Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 shouldn't your mutual aggression clause be optional aggression because probably, in fact I seem to remember telling Sardonic to fix that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 probably, in fact I seem to remember telling Sardonic to fix that I like my answer better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamuella Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 I like my answer better. I like my FACE better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 shouldn't your mutual aggression clause be optional aggression I see no inconsistency in the title of that clause, it dictates under what circumstances mutual aggression between the parties will be contemplated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 I like my FACE better nobody wants to pet an orangutan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamuella Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 nobody wants to pet an orangutan. I don't know, it's not like I'm short of offers ...ladies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Me likes the flag And while I wasn't one of the biggest fans of the olg GOONS(May be because my CDS heritage) I'm ready to see you guys with another eyes. So I'm happy in see this treaty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted September 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 I like my FACE better Back to GBS the both of you. Also edited the OP to reflect the proper final treaty language. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Congrats on your stuff guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 GOONS FTBRG. Glad to see things working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President President Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Hello, GOONS! Congratulations on the simply smashing treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salithus Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Back to GBS the both of you.Also edited the OP to reflect the proper final treaty language. This kind of thing is why I told you to wait until I'm back in town on Monday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Scott Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 All heil gunes D: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gondor Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Awesome announcement there. Congrats on the accomplishments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Sexy Treaty with a sexy alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Congrats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiper Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Awesome treaty win. Bout time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicalTrevor Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 (edited) Good treaty between good people except fallen Edited September 14, 2009 by MagicalTrevor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.