King Irwin Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 Mine Effectiveness: 81% Location: 20.00000, -160.00000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Irwin Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 Colony Effectiveness: 79% Location: 25.00000, -155.00000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Zakharov Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 These datapoints are too close together, so I can't get a single answer. I guess {-5, -150} should be at least 95% but I need more points to find the hotspot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilkokonut Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 [quote name='Provost Zakharov' date='01 February 2010 - 10:22 PM' timestamp='1265091754' post='2152483'] These datapoints are too close together, so I can't get a single answer. I guess {-5, -150} should be at least 95% but I need more points to find the hotspot. [/quote] 5, -150 got me 92%. good enough.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vhalen Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 -4, -142 is 93% 0, -150 is 96% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Zakharov Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 [quote name='evilkokonut' date='01 February 2010 - 10:38 PM' timestamp='1265092707' post='2152554'] 5, -150 got me 92%. good enough.. [/quote] You missed the negative sign in front of the 5. Lucky for you, 5 to -5 isn't that big of a difference On the bright side, your new datapoint was enough to calculate the hotspot: [img]http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/7307/moonhotspotfeb2010.png[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Irwin Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 You da man, Zakharov! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardoon Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 [quote name='Provost Zakharov' date='02 February 2010 - 01:15 AM' timestamp='1265094938' post='2152706'] On the bright side, your new datapoint was enough to calculate the hotspot: [/quote] PZ btw, how you been man? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Myrhh Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 Yep, you nailed it. Thanks. Hooray for trigonometry ! Owner: Colin Myrhh Mine Effectiveness: 100% Resource: Titanium Last Moved: 2/3/2010 Date Purchased: 1/17/2010 Expires: 433 Days Location: -5.00000, -152.00000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted February 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 OP Updated. Thanks guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Myrhh Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 (edited) Does this apply to both the moon base and the moon mine ? edit: punctuation Edited February 4, 2010 by Colin Myrhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Myrhh Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 NVM, that was a dumb question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted February 22, 2010 Report Share Posted February 22, 2010 Holy crap, i was told there would be no math Ok seriously..if someone wants to find me on IRC and explain this to me im feeling mighty mighty lost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted February 23, 2010 Report Share Posted February 23, 2010 [quote name='wickedj' date='22 February 2010 - 03:19 AM' timestamp='1266826797' post='2196969'] Holy crap, i was told there would be no math Ok seriously..if someone wants to find me on IRC and explain this to me im feeling mighty mighty lost [/quote] Disregard, i finally found someone who speaks stupid to explain it to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted February 25, 2010 Report Share Posted February 25, 2010 How can you pinpoint the exact coords? I tried to get as close as I could watching those pictures but it only got me 93% efficiency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kippa Tarxien Posted February 25, 2010 Report Share Posted February 25, 2010 [quote name='kriekfreak' date='25 February 2010 - 11:08 AM' timestamp='1267092716' post='2202882'] How can you pinpoint the exact coords? I tried to get as close as I could watching those pictures but it only got me 93% efficiency. [/quote] Check out Rich333's post on page 3 of this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted February 25, 2010 Report Share Posted February 25, 2010 [quote name='Kippa Tarxien' date='25 February 2010 - 07:14 PM' timestamp='1267125490' post='2203309'] Check out Rich333's post on page 3 of this thread. [/quote] That was helpful, maybe Airme can edit that in the OP. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted February 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2010 The move is coming here in a few days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardoon Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 (edited) Location: -43.00000, 126.00000 Colony Effectiveness: 76% Location: -43.80678, 127.26563 Mine Effectiveness: 77% Edited March 1, 2010 by Shardoon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 The coordinates from last round (-5, -152) give me 66% right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 [quote name='Arcturus Jefferson' date='01 March 2010 - 05:16 PM' timestamp='1267464017' post='2210001'] The coordinates from last round (-5, -152) give me 66% right now. [/quote] -2.81137, -161.894 give me 71% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naros Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 -5.00000, 152.00000 gives 86% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 76.99994, -78.04688 gives me 50% so did the default 1, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigrun Vapneir Posted March 1, 2010 Report Share Posted March 1, 2010 10, -30 is only 50% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onion Posted March 2, 2010 Report Share Posted March 2, 2010 9.62241, -20.39063 = 50% Base Effictiveness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.