starschwar

Thank you again for your efforts, Luna.

Confirmed, &lat=78&lon=23 results in 100% effectiveness.

Confirmed, happy to assist.

Moon Locations Tested: Lat Lon Effectiveness 37 -63 84% Possible Locations for the Moon Hotspot: Moon Lat Moon Lon Probability Observed In 49 -38 25.00000% 26 -87 25.00000% 26 -86 23.29146% 49 -37 19.75054% 50 -37 5.24946% 27 -86 1.70854%

I can confirm &lat=37&lon=-63 produces 100% efficiency! Well done.

Not much in the way of useful data so far. Lots of 1.6% chances in the table with the following input. Moon Locations Tested: Lat Lon Effectiveness -54 101 50% -55 101 50% -54.99999999 101 50%

Your insight is appreciated. We'll see how things go next month.

Confirmed. Well done.

Thank you, that's very useful information. Using non-decimal values in cybernations, -55, 100 also results in 99% efficiency. Close enough for me. At least we'll have three different data points for me to contribute to next month's search.

-54, 101 is still 99%. Curious.

Moon Lat Moon Lon Mars Lat Mars Lon Probability Previously Observed In These Months -54 101 -84.00000002 -149 100.00000%

-55, 101 results in 99% effectiveness. Re-evaluating...

Based on last month's locations (I never moved the 99% facility), here's some results from Luna's table: Moon Lat Moon Lon Mars Lat Mars Lon Probability Previously Observed In These Months -55 101 -84.00000002 -150 89.90760% 12/2012 -55 101 -84.00000002 -149 8.47062% -54 101 -84.00000002 -149 1.62115% -55 101 84.00000002 -150 0.00062%

Thank you for your efforts, Luna.

I can confirm &lat=-21&lon=173 produces 100% effectiveness. Thanks for the spreadsheet and other data.