Shamed Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 Sorry, no can do. Our schedule is booked for a while. The Cupcakery will let you know when we've selected a time and date. Thanks for your time and cooperation. I'm afraid we have yet to agree to surrender terms about the war. We can't decide who is gonna lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rishnokof Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 Next Tuesday good for everyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertFitzy Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I hope to see the GRL go up again, it was fun watching CN glow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobjohnny Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 (edited) I agree for the most part (The next GW will be the 5th), however by your definition GWI probably shouldn't count. After all, it was relatively curbs-tomp-esque. Haha. There was a GW3 I was here for it. That was fun stuff too. Except, now that i think about it I feel I was fighting for the wrong side. Whoever said GW's always take place in the summer is wrong. GW3 was mostly in March if I recall correctly. Edit: typo. Edited April 14, 2009 by bobjohnny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 The Unjust War did not involve a major political shift, rather it was the end of WUT Read what you wrote there ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffron X Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I was under the impression that Great Wars entailed large shifts in the political environment on Bob. For example, after the First Great War, the Orders were no longer as powerful as they were, and with the Second Great War, more alliances began to come to the side of the Orders, and with the third Great War, there was established the idea that has stuck with us for so long, that the Orders are the most powerful alliances on Bob, unchallenged in that role.The next great war will see another massive political revolution. The Unjust War did not involve a major political shift, rather it was the end of WUT, and the Unjust Path never had any power anyway. And the Second Great Patriotic War was not a great war either for the same reasons. Can we all just say that there were 3 Great Wars and move on? I would say that the destruction of GOONS and \m/, the major lulz alliances of the time, was a major shift in politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Principe Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 I was under the impression that Great Wars entailed large shifts in the political environment on Bob. For example, after the First Great War, the Orders were no longer as powerful as they were, and with the Second Great War, more alliances began to come to the side of the Orders, and with the third Great War, there was established the idea that has stuck with us for so long, that the Orders are the most powerful alliances on Bob, unchallenged in that role.The next great war will see another massive political revolution. The Unjust War did not involve a major political shift, rather it was the end of WUT, and the Unjust Path never had any power anyway. And the Second Great Patriotic War was not a great war either for the same reasons. Can we all just say that there were 3 Great Wars and move on? Read what you wrote there ... I would say that the destruction of GOONS and \m/, the major lulz alliances of the time, was a major shift in politics. The split and destruction of the dominant powerbloc does count as a large shift in my book. The same applies for a lesser extend to the War of the Coalition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 A Great War is when your side wins.. All other wars just aren't that great :lol: On another note... Why not start a war over what war it is GWV Bloc Versus GWIV etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mergerberger II Posted April 14, 2009 Report Share Posted April 14, 2009 Read what you wrote there ... >.> <.< It may not have been exactly what I meant, but I still say 3 great wars have occurred, not 4 and certainly not 5, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BogdanSin Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I say we skip GWVI and go straight to GWV, amirite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the damned Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 The talk is always the same, first we discuss what we should call the next war. Once the war comes everyone starts to argue about what we should call the present war until its over and then everyone starts coming up with different names to refer to it by until next summer when the whole mess starts again. How about for once we wait to see what happens before trying to place a label on something that has not happened yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 The next war should be called the War of the Lollipops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Angelus Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 The Great Atlantic War... since Pacifica will fall... haha idk.. jk... Things seem to be heating up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Its not that hard to start a great war, Make you a small alliance of people (About 20 or so people) who want it to start, Get a well-known and strong protector, Attack a main combatant in the war, Get their allies to attack you, Call in your protector. Bam you got a great war. The rest of the work is left up to the MDP and treaty webs. Its what has started The Unjust War and The War of the Coalition. Somehow, I just don't think this would work.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newhotness Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Maybe someone will get pissed off enough at RAD to come knocking on our door, and then when that happens, you will most definitely get a great war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incitatus Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 I would like to know where IV and V went to :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njndirish Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 The potential conflict won't be labeled a GW unless it matches I-III in intensity and awesomeness. The UJW will never be considered a GW because it lacked a strong ending. The War of Coalition lacked two sides, (see Philo's post http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=31861 ) It was a war of sheer numbers yes, but did not have the two clear cut sides I-III and even the UJW had. Because the Treaty Web is dead, let's see if we can guess the two sides and the reason that would bring them to fight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobjohnny Posted April 17, 2009 Report Share Posted April 17, 2009 The next war should be called the War of the Lollipops. I support this. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minilla Island Posted April 17, 2009 Report Share Posted April 17, 2009 Why do you want a war that you don't want to participate in? So when everyone is done killing themselves, he can pick up the pieces of what's left, and get his Alliance sanctioned to boot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fighter26 Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 Next Tuesday good for everyone? Sorry I'm booked... hows Sunday work for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireandthepassion Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 Sorry I'm booked... hows Sunday work for you? Oh Sunday doesn't work for me. How about 6 months from the thursday after the next full moon over the city of East St. Louis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiawatha Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 (edited) treaties seem to be discretionally honored these days, as we've seen with conflicts involving minor alliances who have been left to dry by those they have treaties with. Which means the initial conflict will have to have a pretty large spark to really set CN on fire. Edited April 18, 2009 by hiawatha2k8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the peaceful samurai Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 if war starts I bet diplomacy will end it quit quickly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykep Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 It will start after the 4th and 5th end with a peace time inbetween where several curbstompings will take place. Then it will start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleh32 Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 I haven't been around to long, but I've been hearing talks aboutanother massive war going down in the near future. I know global wars have occurred in the past, and I'm just wondering if they have the tendency to significantly change the landscape of the game? Such as new alliances coming into power once a massive one has taken a beating. That's pretty much how it works around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.