Newhotness
-
Posts
1,354 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by Newhotness
-
The Resistance is still beating!
Newhotness replied to anamu7tram's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
wait, so is this supposed to be like the Gramlins thing where you take back something thats yours after someone killed it off? if so, then no one should have a problem with what youre doing since they all hailed them for doing the same thing. Sure it looked a little better when they did it, but its still the same concept -
[quote name='Lurunin' timestamp='1305682533' post='2713993'] ANOTHER case of PZI?...did you all think that the flak Gotham got was for show? [/quote] Seriously? PZI isnt that bad. There are ways to get out of PZI. Its only Perma if you let it be
-
All these technicalities dont matter cuz they did it and are going to continue to do what they want. I just wonder where they will stand a year from now.
-
It doesnt seem like this bloc is gonna actually do much of anything. Just kinda there
-
A Brief Message from \m/
Newhotness replied to Merrie Melodies's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
im kinda surprised to see \m/ is still around -
Announcement from The Order of the Paradox
Newhotness replied to kencojenko's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
All ive got to say is, good luck with your war TOP. should be fun -
Joint New Polar Order/Ragnarok Announcement
Newhotness replied to Van Hoo III's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
NSO-\m/ MADP ftw -
April Fool jokes kinda died out. Everyone expects them and it doesnt have the same effect when everyone knows its fake. Might as well not do it
-
[quote name='Zessa' date='01 April 2010 - 05:02 PM' timestamp='1270155749' post='2244324'] I think you should go straight to our leadership. I'm not sure why you decided to go immediately to public channels, but I doubt my superiors are going to want to discuss this here. Edit: This is not only a completely neutral post but not in any way representative of Polaris. [/quote] immediately to public channels prob cuz part of the announcement was a public apology to RoK. And, even though it may not be discussed in public, i see no reason why the idea shouldnt be public. Im not saying it [b]should[/b]. just that theres no reason why it [b]shouldnt[/b] be. \m/ isnt hiding anything
-
[quote name='Choader' date='01 April 2010 - 01:52 PM' timestamp='1270144343' post='2244042'] Feels like a midget is hanging from my necklace [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Gold_medal_icon.svg/16px-Gold_medal_icon.svg.png[/img] [/quote] I like that Earth rapper. I think his name is Ludacris. or something foreign like that. but he said it best with that line. Man this gold is heavy
-
Joint New Polar Order/Ragnarok Announcement
Newhotness replied to Van Hoo III's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
[quote name='kevin32891' date='31 March 2010 - 11:56 PM' timestamp='1270094169' post='2243017'] Wait you have your alliances mixed up, and I fixed it for you. Happens sometimes. [/quote] i think you just read it wrong. lol. i said pretty much what you edited my post to say. NpO were bad partners and didnt apologize to you guys for it. I guess i could have worded it a little better -
i think i know how to find the hidden message, but im waaay too lazy to take the steps to do so.
-
Joint New Polar Order/Ragnarok Announcement
Newhotness replied to Van Hoo III's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
NpO cant really complain about NSO not liking anything they announce since, from what it looks like, NpO hasnt apologized to NSO for being !@#$%* treaty partners -
Joint New Polar Order/Ragnarok Announcement
Newhotness replied to Van Hoo III's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
[quote name='heggo' date='31 March 2010 - 11:26 PM' timestamp='1270092381' post='2242951'] Good luck RoK, maybe a Polar treaty will turn out differently for you. [/quote] doubt it -
Joint New Polar Order/Ragnarok Announcement
Newhotness replied to Van Hoo III's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
[quote name='Gopherbashi' date='31 March 2010 - 11:16 PM' timestamp='1270091743' post='2242928'] This is obviously an April Fools joke. Dajobo is listed as Imperial Regent. [/quote] i sure hope so. lol. if not, Hoo, i am disappoint. -
Anarchistic Brotherhood
Newhotness replied to The Mongol-Swedes's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Mongol, When i read the topic i thought you left LSF and started something new, and i was all Then i read the OP and saw that it was just a treaty, then i was all -
[quote name='Smacky' date='29 March 2010 - 01:39 AM' timestamp='1269841168' post='2239846'] What's the point, CN is so overrun with ego it's like trying to find the best snowflake in the arctic. [/quote] never really thought of it that way, but the man brings up a good point
-
You should do TpE. what way we have 2 "little p" alliances
-
so are you guys TPE or TpE? cuz we already have a tPE i think. (that is the way prolific empire does it right?)
-
i remember floppy disks and walkmans
-
[quote name='supercoolyellow' date='28 March 2010 - 10:57 PM' timestamp='1269831408' post='2239734'] the night MCXA is to pass 2 ppl, you skip out. [/quote] brb, attacking MCXA to make sure that doesnt happen
-
[quote name='Lord Brendan' date='28 March 2010 - 10:28 PM' timestamp='1269829671' post='2239706'] Poison Clan? More like Steroids Clan. [/quote] dont hate the player, hate the game
-
<insert comment about another PC medal here>
-
[quote name='Venizelos' date='27 March 2010 - 01:47 PM' timestamp='1269712047' post='2238399'] hate to break it to you but those arent massive nations [/quote] top for nations on the AA tho. so in their eyes, they are massive since they cant fight em off. lol
-
[quote name='President S O' date='27 March 2010 - 12:45 PM' timestamp='1269708333' post='2238365'] The reason they need to post such requests of their own membership in their threads, is because of the way your alliance, and your allies act toward and treat them. Seriously, build a bridge and get over the past and come into the present, its embarrassing for your alliance. o/ ADI [/quote] dont know you so this doesnt really apply to you, but just throwin it out there since you happened to bring it up. from what ive seen, the people that always preach "its in the past, get over it" are either the ones who have done someone wrong in the past,so you would like for them to get over it, or hold the most grudges.