WalkerNinja Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 (edited) Excuse me! Excuse me! You seem to have made a grievous mistake my fellow allies. Your treaty violates many of the strictures which apply explicitly to treaties. These strictures are the glue that keeps Planet Bob turning. Here are the ones that I see at a casual glance: You did not include any manner of numbering or formatting. There is no symbolic passage explaining sovereignty and how you will not violate each other's sovereignity. You did not include the words "Defense" or "Aggression." The phrase "aggression against one signatory is an act of aggression against both" does not appear. There is no Death Cookie. You did not stroke each others' egos prior to the publication of this treaty. The treaty is not presented in quotation tags. There are no flags on the treaty. There is no false fllowery preamble to heighten the sense of betrayal when it comes time. No word in this treaty exceeds four syllables. This treaty does not possess a quirky name. Clearly this all must be some sort of misunderstanding or oversight. Did you have the Rebbilon write this? I can give you the e-mail address of a good global despot that could fix this treaty up in a jiff if you're interested. Edited March 31, 2009 by WalkerNinja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 good treaty, interesting timing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I didn't read this in the Tattler. I can't possibly be true. Our ruse has been uncovered )): Tattler )): We'd have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for that meddling Sponge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Excuse me! Excuse me!You seem to have made a grievous mistake my fellow allies. Your treaty violates many of the strictures which apply explicitly to treaties. These strictures are the glue that keeps Planet Bob turning. Here are the ones that I see at a casual glance: You did not include any manner of numbering or formatting. There is no symbolic passage explaining sovereignty and how you will not violate each other's sovereignity. You did not include the words "Defense" or "Aggression." There is no Death Cookie. You did not stroke each others' egos prior to the publication of this treaty. The treaty is not presented in quotation tags. There are no flags on the treaty. There is no false fllowery preamble to heighten the sense of betrayal when it comes time. No word in this treaty exceeds four syllables. This treaty does not possess a quirky name. Clearly this all must be some sort of misunderstanding or oversight. Did you have the Rebbilon write this? I can give you the e-mail address of a good global despot that could fix this treaty up in a jiff if you're interested. If you honestly had to choose, would you rather kiss Oprah Winfrey with chewed up french fries in her mouth or eat Jessica Alba's Snicker Doodles? Think about this and come back. (Also, good format. I like the four syllables) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCFalkenberg Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Excuse me! Excuse me!You seem to have made a grievous mistake my fellow allies. Your treaty violates many of the strictures which apply explicitly to treaties. These strictures are the glue that keeps Planet Bob turning. Here are the ones that I see at a casual glance: You did not include any manner of numbering or formatting. There is no symbolic passage explaining sovereignty and how you will not violate each other's sovereignity. You did not include the words "Defense" or "Aggression." The phrase "aggression against one signatory is an act of aggression against both" does not appear. There is no Death Cookie. You did not stroke each others' egos prior to the publication of this treaty. The treaty is not presented in quotation tags. There are no flags on the treaty. There is no false fllowery preamble to heighten the sense of betrayal when it comes time. No word in this treaty exceeds four syllables. This treaty does not possess a quirky name. Clearly this all must be some sort of misunderstanding or oversight. Did you have the Rebbilon write this? I can give you the e-mail address of a good global despot that could fix this treaty up in a jiff if you're interested. also, no joke clauses. or clauses about preferred desserts. :jihad: )): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uralica Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 :lol: Yet again our former protectorate in Argent is impressing TOOL (and certainly, impressing me) o/ Argent o/ Grems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raholia Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Oh, this is just wonderful. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbeast Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Congrats you two! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavii Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Maybe we should hang out with Argent more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkerNinja Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 If you honestly had to choose, would you rather kiss Oprah Winfrey with chewed up french fries in her mouth or eat Jessica Alba's Snicker Doodles?Think about this and come back. (Also, good format. I like the four syllables) Oprah. She can be my sugar mama... Also, I forgot the most blatant violation of all: You have failed to specify which acronym applies to this treaty. This treaty cannot be added to the treaty web until this has taken place (and is thereby not binding until this correction has been made). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwthegreat Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Congrats to Both Alliances o/ Gremlins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zurital Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Congrats to Argent and Grämlins! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrous Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I love how the first post is like, "meh, we have a treaty." and Ejay is like, "Dude, this is Farkin' awesome. Rock on!!!!1111one!!!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KagetheSecond Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 If only all treaties were so plainly worded... Mazal Tov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fokker Aeroplanbau Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Needs more funnehs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I didn't read this in the Tattler. It can't possibly be true. This man speaks the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 (edited) Gremlins signing two treaties in one day? WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO?! Edited March 31, 2009 by Azaghul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Good. Carry on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willaim Kreiger Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I'm indifferent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sceptor o Sordidness Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Nicely written treaty you got there, congrats to you both Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claroqsi Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Argent + Gremlins = <3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Dan Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Wish we had thought of doing this, Grämlins. Oh wait.... Congratulations to both of you guys!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROMMELHSQ Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Nothing about helping us when TOP betray us? o/ Gremlins o/ Argent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-money Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I'm like, Gre and Argent got a treaty, Hail and stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkerNinja Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Gremlins signing two treaties in one day?WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO?! War. This is the treaty acceleration phase wherein even the most independent of alliances start signing more and more treaties trying to buttress themselves against the wild winds to come. During this period it is not unusual to see the occasional treaty cancellation being made by far sighted individuals hoping to cancel far enough in advance to escape the negative consequences and connotations thereof (see MA cancellation). This phase is typically succeeded by a gradual increase in treaty cancellations as it becomes more and more apparent that things are indeed about to hit the fan. There is often also a final gasp of treaty signings. /tinfoil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.