astronaut jones Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 I'm surprised some of GGA's more honourable allies haven't given notice of treaty cancellations, in light of all that's been revealed here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavii Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 That would be stirring the pot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pezstar Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 I'm surprised some of GGA's more honourable allies haven't given notice of treaty cancellations, in light of all that's been revealed here. GGA's treaty partners: ODN- No one has threatened GGA, so there's no reason for them to cancel. They've not come to their defense at all publicly, but it's ODN, and they're known for not liking to defend their allies. The Brigade: Wow. I've not heard from them in forever. Their remaining treaty partners are all also treatied to their masters. It's no surprise they're not cancelling treaties. With maybe 2 possible exceptions, they're all terrified of NPO. They probably couldn't get permission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 GGA's treaty partners: ODN- No one has threatened GGA, so there's no reason for them to cancel. They've not come to their defense at all publicly, but it's ODN, and they're known for not liking to defend their allies. The Brigade: Wow. I've not heard from them in forever. Their remaining treaty partners are all also treatied to their masters. It's no surprise they're not cancelling treaties. With maybe 2 possible exceptions, they're all terrified of NPO. They probably couldn't get permission. But the GGA all but admitted to being a puppet alliance, and they all but admitted that in a war, they're essentially the LAST alliance you'd want to defend you because of how ill-equipped they are for any sort of conflict. Being partnered to an alliance that is ill-equipped is one thing, but admitting as much that your alliance isn't sovereign and will bow to the whims of another is down right treacherous. Why would any treaty partner, any honourable treaty partner, trust them knowing they're not in control of their own alliance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pezstar Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 But the GGA all but admitted to being a puppet alliance, and they all but admitted that in a war, they're essentially the LAST alliance you'd want to defend you because of how ill-equipped they are for any sort of conflict. Being partnered to an alliance that is ill-equipped is one thing, but admitting as much that your alliance isn't sovereign and will bow to the whims of another is down right treacherous. Why would any treaty partner, any honourable treaty partner, trust them knowing they're not in control of their own alliance? I'm sure ODN isn't canceling because they don't want to get called out on deserting a treaty partner in a time of need again. I have no idea about The Brigade. As for the rest, they are all also treatied to NPO, who is controlling the GGA. There's no need to remove that treaty, aside from redundancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 I'm sure ODN isn't canceling because they don't want to get called out on deserting a treaty partner in a time of need again. I have no idea about The Brigade. As for the rest, they are all also treatied to NPO, who is controlling the GGA. There's no need to remove that treaty, aside from redundancy. Hooray for the treaty web, I guess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yetanothername Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 GGA's treaties: NATO The Brigade ODN Echelon TPF TORN UPN VE GDA IRON MCXA NPO Valhalla Now how many of those do you think are also under the control of Pacifica? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 GGA's treaties:NATO The Brigade ODN Echelon TPF TORN UPN VE GDA IRON MCXA NPO Valhalla Now how many of those do you think are also under the control of Pacifica? I'm gonna guess the NPO for sure is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willirica Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 GGA's treaties:NATO The Brigade ODN Echelon TPF TORN UPN VE GDA IRON MCXA NPO Valhalla Now how many of those do you think are also under the control of Pacifica? your missing his point. He is not saying everyone treatied to the NPO is a NPO pawn. He is saying only GGA is , making NPO and GGA one in the same so there would be no point in cancelling said treaties with GGA, regardless of how amazingly retarded they make themselves look like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yetanothername Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 your missing his point. He is not saying everyone treatied to the NPO is a NPO pawn. He is saying only GGA is , making NPO and GGA one in the same so there would be no point in cancelling said treaties with GGA, regardless of how amazingly retarded they make themselves look like. I'm not missing his point. I'm saying that while the NPO influence over the GGA is the strongest, they arn't the only one strongly influenced by the NPO. Hence, two NPO children won't cancel their treaties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 (edited) Here's what GGA needs to do: Stop posting. Completely. Edited March 20, 2009 by hizzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Here's what GGA needs to do:Don't log in to anything for the next 72 hours. All of you. Go get a girlfriend (or boyfriend), pick up a box of rubbers, and take the weekend off. This one's on the house, next time it'll cost you tech. So basically you're requesting that 'all GGA turn off their computers'. This is quite a good suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yetanothername Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Wait. If they turn off their computers, then this epic thread would die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrnea Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Wait. If they turn off their computers, then this epic thread would die. Yes, but hizzy was arguing a manner of 'devil's advocate' here, as in what would be the best for GGA. The conditions for GGA's humiliation to end and the conditions for the continuation of this thread are most likely mutually exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 (edited) I'm gonna guess the NPO for sure is.GGA would also have been an acceptable answer. I know they're not on the list, but come on... Edited March 20, 2009 by cookavich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 So basically you're requesting that 'all GGA turn off their computers'.This is quite a good suggestion. Ya, but then I'm afraid the concept of electricity, "on", and "off" would just throw another wrench at them and this thread would explode again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willirica Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 I'm not missing his point. I'm saying that while the NPO influence over the GGA is the strongest, they arn't the only one strongly influenced by the NPO. Hence, two NPO children won't cancel their treaties. whatever influence NPO has over them is irrellevent, they are sovreign alliances; unlike the GGA, aka IGV. Do i really need to recap this clusterluck of a thread to prove that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxNation Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Ya, but then I'm afraid the concept of electricity, "on", and "off" would just throw another wrench at them and this thread would explode again. Wait though They might have trouble spying and kicking out trium if their computers are off? Plus doesn't the NPO control their power switches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Srqt Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 (edited) So let me get this straight, while Ironchef was in here complaining about her home being invaded and what a vile act spying on home forums is Degen was taunting Nintenderek about GGA spying on their home forums? That is delicious, I do wonder what happened to the GGA that I once respected. Edited March 20, 2009 by KingSrqt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 That is delicious, I do wonder what happened to the GGA that I once respected. Nothing. You were just an idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Electron Sponge Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 I think it's more funny that they actually wasted their time trying to get off the Vox forum. I mean... it's the Vox forum. We could do our alliance business in a public thread on this forum and it wouldn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorbolt Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 What does it say in GGAs charter about foreign people running in their government elections? Perhaps they could contract out a couple government positions. /me Minister of Internal Affairs for hire! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Srqt Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Nothing. You were just an idiot I am starting to think you might be right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 What does it say in GGAs charter about foreign people running in their government elections? Perhaps they could contract out a couple government positions./me Minister of Internal Affairs for hire! ochocinco for king. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Scream Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 If this thread gets to 120 pages, I am getting naked and running through the street and then posting pictures of it in here. You really really don't want that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts