Sargun II Posted October 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 I am in KMRP too, I'm about to become one of the more powerful nations through quality RPing. I say just RP, have fun, don't be too strict, but people wanted strict, and we're going to play strict I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 . And I am in KMRP As am I, fear the guy who owns the entire middle east but doens't have the decency to post! I'll be invaded someday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kielmog Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 1. New nations, even if they're huge IG, cannot have an advantage. They have to work in RP, making bonds, RPing military advances, etc to get more powerful.2. RP wars would be much, much more devastating. If you want to RP your nation stats, honestly, then RP wars mean !@#$. Why? Because well your IG nation was untouched, you can rebuild quickly to those stats again. 3. It doesn't punish you for honoring your alliance and not deserting it. 4. It doesn't punish you for wanting to grow your nation IG at the quickest rate for IG alliance expansion (if you're a bank) or war is looming. 5. CNRP solely dependent on the players themselves and how they interact with one another. IG politics, nations, and alliances do not interfere with this RP which would great to see in my eyes. Personally I'm tired of the "if you want to RP maximum in RP you gotta max out IG", that's just punishing the player's IG nation and the IG develop for the sake of RPing. RPing should be fun and be devestating in RP, not affecting IG things too. /end rant RPing to your nation's stats should, at the very least, be a common-sense starting point for identifying a nation's strength and potential influence in CNRP. I'll have to disagree only with point 1 in that if some giant nation joined CNRP, I'd let him have the ability to kick the crap out of most alliances and/or blocs here. If Matt Miller shows up saying, "HAI GUYS!!! LET'S RP," and then proceeds to nuke us all into oblivion, I'd accept the RP because of his nation's overwhelming NS, wonders, technology, etc., etc. If in-game stats are the base and someone has a massive base, they should be able to take out anyone who doesn't have a decent shot. (1/2 NS or less, in my opinion) There is no reason to max out IG to be maxed out in CNRP. I am nearly maxed out because it doesn't harm my nation in terms of environment but it does cost a little extra every day to keep my nation ready and alert. There can be "ready" troops and "reserve" troops and then what I'd call "last resort" troops consisting of soldiers and RP citizens but your "ready" troops are your IG troops and your potential troops can be your "reserves". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silhouette Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 I like this idea, it is sensible..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shan Revan Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 If Matt Miller shows up saying, "HAI GUYS!!! LET'S RP," and then proceeds to nuke us all into oblivion, I'd accept the RP because of his nation's overwhelming NS, wonders, technology, etc., etc. I could ask him to do that if you'd like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otto Verteidiger Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 I could ask him to do that if you'd like. For the love of all things holy I ask you to not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shan Revan Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 Such a spoilsport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Pfft. I totally support you doing it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Got rid of the tech chart. Wasn't really argued too much when it was put up but has since encountered uber opposition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Quick clarification, are we RPing by total troop strength or total troop strength including soldier efficiency. In my opinion soldier efficiency makes the most sense. If one went to full mobilization one should be able to up their soldier efficiency by take the economic hit with guerilla camps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V The King Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Got rid of the tech chart. Wasn't really argued too much when it was put up but has since encountered uber opposition. That's because most nations here now are considered well advanced according to the chart, that's it, it became outdated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USNA Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 I say keep it up for the newer players and in the meantime deliberate on the steps for higher tech levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Yeah I was thinking about that, then posted my idea for a new tech chart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Stukov II Posted October 7, 2008 Report Share Posted October 7, 2008 Quick clarification, are we RPing by total troop strength or total troop strength including soldier efficiency. In my opinion soldier efficiency makes the most sense. If one went to full mobilization one should be able to up their soldier efficiency by take the economic hit with guerilla camps. I've been using actual troops. What does everyone else use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 i think efficiency would make sense too, using basically triyuns logic using g camps and barracks is an econ hit and affects your in game nation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Stukov II Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 What happens when you swap guerilla camps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I don't remember who said this, but.. Thats not an exact quote, but it's from Mark Twain, AKA Samuel Clemmens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USNA Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I've been using actual troops. What does everyone else use? I'd say using actual troop strength would be best. The efficiency should show the effectiveness of your troops through equipment and training. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I could ask him to do that if you'd like. For the love of all things holy I ask you to not. Such a spoilsport. I LOL'd Pfft. I totally support you doing it! What if you're the one nuked? I've been using actual troops. What does everyone else use? I use the 10x multiplier. What happens when you swap guerilla camps? I would say that is reflected here by the gurilla training stops, and they lose the skills due to not using them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted October 8, 2008 Report Share Posted October 8, 2008 I use just regular soldier numbers. But isn't buying all your soldiers for war enough hurt on your IG nation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 One thing I note on this map that protectorates aren't really defined. New players might not try and claim protected land because they might think it means it is claimed by that nation or something like that.You should note that protectorates are generally lands that a country is willing to cede when a player that they feel is responsible to RP with that territory comes to CNRP. Something like that. Discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otto Verteidiger Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 Discuss. Being done so in that thread... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 Seeing as I put this post up before that thread, I don't think you should be saying anything.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otto Verteidiger Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 Seeing as I put this post up before that thread, I don't think you should be saying anything.. That's where the main discussion is being held, *shrugs* I go where the others go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shan Revan Posted October 9, 2008 Report Share Posted October 9, 2008 Alright, I intend to start constructing my island shortly. Whilst I intend to remain more or less within the confines of my first post about it, to which no one complained, let me know if anyone feels I'm going overboard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.