Jump to content

RP Community Survey


Evangeline Anovilis
 Share

Survey  

33 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Just a short survey to gauge opinion on a few matters.

 

Notes

 

First question should be answered on a basis of what you think is absolutely necessary, not what all would be fun. Set priorities and try to point out what you think has absolute vital importance. This question establishes priorities.

 

Second question is on technology and customisation. For better understanding the options are ordered in increasing severity.

 

Lastly, a matter of naval sizes.

 

Votes are not binding, but it might be useful to know what people think.

 

Comments contributing to reforms are appreciated, insults and sniping are not. Dumb behaviour will be ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

For what its worth, I strongly believe that a points system similar to RP40 or RPA should be implemented for militaries, and that if nuclear weapons are abolished, (I believe they should be but did not vote as such), then they should be exchanged for points for further military customisation.

 

 

Great poll by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only lacking option is in the tech part - "Technology should be limited to current technology, as well as viable and proven concepts that never entered full-scale production."

That's "Technology must be restricted to current technology and only working systems should be usable.", if it is a failed (sales-wise) system that has been build in small number only for demonstration or "Technology must be restricted to current technology, though people should be able to use own creations, provided they can prove their stuff to be feasable" if it is proven in concept only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rules to prevent land expansions to massive empires


i liked the poll but i thought that this was a bit unclear

"massive empires" ie. the ussr, the usa, etc. have a role to play in the world. it's just that people will go so far beyond that to game-breaking levels. so i ended up not checking this option and maybe others thought the same. or not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are rules to limit expansion to prevent blobs. Of course, if you are of the opinion such states are necessary or that the invisible hand of spreading thin and aggravating others will take care of overexpansion, feel free to not tick the box. I didn't tick it for my part...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of the community chooses to participate in the political aspects of CN, following traditional RP1 standards, these are the people also punished most severely in the RP, unless you're going to make the argument that there should be more to RP statistics than simply logging in three times a month in order to send or receive tech and pay bills, removing the IG element.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basing it off RL population simply means the most desired regions become even more desired.

 

Military size should be based solely off IG stats plus the recommended modifiers.

 

It being based on IG doesn't make sense to me. Why should someone who has a small undeveloped nation IG have to have a small undeveloped military, regardless of their rp nation's size or area. Someone having the entire continental US and only with 100,000 troops isn't very fair, must less realistic. And in these rp's, aren't we trying to be, for the most part, realistic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belonging to a neutral alliance is not a crime and people shouldn't be punished for it. You guys have to really think about what you're saying sometimes. You want to punish or cripple people just because they play CN differently from you and so you can be strong. How does that make you any better than your cnrp tormentors? I'm open to actual rules that balance rp, not more of the same quasi jim crow laws of the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is your choice to participate in wars IG.

 

The majority of the community chooses to participate in the political aspects of CN, following traditional RP1 standards, these are the people also punished most severely in the RP, unless you're going to make the argument that there should be more to RP statistics than simply logging in three times a month in order to send or receive tech and pay bills, removing the IG element.

 

You're saying that you have the choice of either actually playing a political simulator as a political simulator, or log in every 20 days and be rewarded with superior starts to RP with. It should not be an either or, since just about everyone not exclusively in RP1(With the exception of Melech and Cent) are not on a neutral AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...