Mr Vicarious Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1335811824' post='2961214'] Logic has entered this thread. Everyone needs to use it accordingly and directly as they talk about what they "heard" and all that. Edit: Am I really the only person left that doesn't see the FARK attack as a pre-empt? Seeing as it was my alliance that was attacked, how about I get to say if it was or wasn't? Guess what... it wasn't. It was just an attack. [/quote] I, for one, appreciate this fine semantic arbitration. Well said, for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1335811824' post='2961214'] Logic has entered this thread. Everyone needs to use it accordingly and directly as they talk about what they "heard" and all that. Edit: Am I really the only person left that doesn't see the FARK attack as a pre-empt? Seeing as it was my alliance that was attacked, how about I get to say if it was or wasn't? Guess what... it wasn't. It was just an attack. [/quote] Get out. This thing called logic you seem so infatuated with has obviously corrupted you. It has no place here. *Edit: Also, when's your next interview? Edited April 30, 2012 by Kzoppistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewPoseidon Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 Oh, oh, why NG, why? I'm gonna miss your style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 [quote name='Kzoppistan' timestamp='1335814313' post='2961221'] Get out. This thing called logic you seem so infatuated with has obviously corrupted you. It has no place here. *Edit: Also, when's your next interview? [/quote] ? You mean when will I have a guest next or..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1335815894' post='2961226'] ? You mean when will I have a guest next or..? [/quote] Yeah, as in, who and when is your next guest. (sorry, drinking heavily atm) Edited April 30, 2012 by Kzoppistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 Thrash wants Nascar on, which I am willing to do, but ole Nas will have to step up to the plate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1335816493' post='2961228'] Thrash wants Nascar on, which I am willing to do, but ole Nas will have to step up to the plate. [/quote] Jorost would be better. Anyway, back on topic: yeah, this move makes me feels stuff about the uncertain future and now I'm going to debate its ramifications with others! After I get back from the bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1335811824' post='2961214'] Logic has entered this thread. Everyone needs to use it accordingly and directly as they talk about what they "heard" and all that. Edit: Am I really the only person left that doesn't see the FARK attack as a pre-empt? Seeing as it was my alliance that was attacked, how about I get to say if it was or wasn't? Guess what... it wasn't. It was just an attack. [/quote] Well, it was a pre-empt in the actual sense of the word, but I know what you're saying and I agree with you. It was legit because you said you're on /this/ side, and reserve the right to attack anyone on /that/ side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1335824803' post='2961271'] Well, it was a pre-empt in the actual sense of the word, but I know what you're saying and I agree with you. It was legit because you said you're on /this/ side, and reserve the right to attack anyone on /that/ side. [/quote] Exactly Gibs you and I are not allowed to agree, stop it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted April 30, 2012 Report Share Posted April 30, 2012 (edited) I've always thought that to be a matter of semantics and really not a point worth debating. On one hand, if you take the joke cb given literally it applies, in the context of the entire war maybe not so much... On the other hand-- who cares? Edited April 30, 2012 by IYIyTh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.