memoryproblems

[quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1334425914' post='2953233'] (see bolded) - as opposed to alliances that like taking the wrong path so they are possibly threatened and drawn to the wrong side of a war. [/quote] Some alliances do the right thing, others do the easy thing.

[quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1334425052' post='2953218'] Lol, what. Please explain to me who even wants to roll NPO anymore, and then explain to me who in that category is capable of rallying a coalition bigger than could be dealt with by NPO's immediate allies alone. [/quote] I don't think its high probability any-more, but I think NPO's behind is still sore enough that they aren't taking chances. And beyond that, I think NPO is careful to stay on a certian track and not allow anything to possibly threaten to draw them to the wrong side of a war (not that they would let it happen anyway.)

Congratulations to Invicta, you're better off. NPO is so scared of getting rolled again, they have no problem with putting what is easy in front of what is right. I think the alliances that are treatied to NPO, particularly the ones at MDP level should ask themselves how NPO would respond should you should find yourselves in a situation that might lead to a defeat. Pacifica will probably stand around uncomfortably and say if you need their help, they'll think about it, and Brehon will probably act like its outrageous that you would even ask them to get into a situation where they might lose. Meanwhile, you've been running and throwing yourselves on swords for them for years.

[quote name='Illustrious' timestamp='1334382010' post='2952859'] Honestly with the amount of ex NAAC nations in Polar, you could say that Polar is/was NAAC v.2.0 or something, not counting GR. [/quote] Strange how that happens when NAAC and NpO used to be mortal enemies.

I had heard about this, and I'm still like "Oh, wow". Best of luck. NAAC was an amazing alliance in its original run, I hope you can do the name justice.

[center][img]http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad10/cnsanitarium/Sanitarium%20Imagery/officialannoucement.png[/img] [img]http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/1239/flagdynamic1.png[/img][/center] Without alot of pointless talk about what Sanitarium is about (because you don't care) or what we intend to accomplish (because secrecy is useful), I would simply like to take this oppertunity to announce that Sanitarium is back. [b]Forums:[/b] [url]http://www.cn-sanitarium.com/forums[/url] [b]IRC:[/b] #sanitarium [b]Government:[/b] memoryproblems, [i]Premier[/i] KOwens06, [i]Chancellor[/i] GDICross, [i]Minister of Internal Affairs[/i] Medix, [i]Minister of War[/i] Our charter is available for public viewing on our forums. Statement regarding protection will be made shortly.

BRB, cutting down a tree.

GOONs, needing help with micro-alliances since April 20, 2009. Impressive.

[center][img]http://cn-warriors.com/flags/warriors-war-600px.jpg[/img] [b][size="5"]The Warriors[/size][/b] [size="6"]Declaration of War[/size][/center] Warriors declare war on the New Desolate Order and the Hellas. Best of luck to all parties. [b]Signed on behalf of the Warriors,[/b] Hetfield, [i]God King, Illegal couper of Clash, Rightful leader of the Warriors, Lazy bum.[/i] Clash, [i]Pretend Leader, Guy who does everything, Frequent Viagra User.[/i] Edit: Appearantly they told me the wrong alliances. Basterds.

This alternating caps stuff is becoming too much, something must be done. We'll be seeing you soon enough to force your apology.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Muck Fizzou! They got exactly what they deserved. All in all, a pretty wild four days of basketball, happy to see the Jayhawks held on to make it to the sweet 16. Now all they've got to do is beat two two half-retarded North Carolina teams full of man-childs to make it to the final four.

[quote name='paul711' timestamp='1331926307' post='2938975'] up until now I have been but an observer to everything but this post made,me laugh. [/quote] Its like, what to do this weekend? Go out and meet girls, or stay home and WAR!? [b]WAR!!![/b] haha.

[quote name='admin' timestamp='1331899610' post='2938850'] Ok, you've convinced me. CN:TE is coming back. I'll post updates on the TE forums and in CN:SE on a specific date of return. (Probably over the coming weekend) [/quote] You have made me very very happy. Thank you If not for CN:TE, I was going to have too much free time, which I would have probably used to try to meet girls, at which I would have likely failed and consequently crushed my frail ego.

June 4th right here. I don't remember what life was like before CN. It was probably pretty good.

I think the "down" page on the TE index uses some dynamic code that updates to the most recent day. I think it would make more sense if that was set to when it was actually taken down, but i think it was designed for instances when downtime would be just a few hours, not a few days. As for what is going on in TE, I'm of course interested in whats going on, I'm a little afraid that it might never come back, but if it doesn't, I guess its been a nice ride anyway.

[quote name='Randalla' timestamp='1331095152' post='2934938'] Gambona, my friend, you should know you can always bring concerns to any of us here. But to see this as hostile without knowing how extensively it's been discussed behind the scenes is hardly fair for either party. I can assure you and anyone with concerns, this is far from hostile. Come and chat if you like. Good move, friends, you know you have our support, TSA and TNoT. [/quote] Did the government of TSA request/approve this or not? If they did not, then it is most certianly an unauthorized takeover performed presumably against the will of TSA's government. Perhaps I'm missing something, but it looks to me as if this was done on the request of The Apparatus and not on the request of TSA. If that is the case, it paints a pretty clear picture that The Apparatus doesn't understand what the word "sovereignty" means. It might not be done in malice, it might have the best interests of TSA in mind, but if an alliance isn't active enough to save its own skin, even by being active enough to ask for somebody else's help themselves, then it doesn't really deserve to live.

[quote name='Stelios' timestamp='1330880027' post='2933214'] Can i use your flag improperly? And now i understand. Thanks for clearing this up. Am I evil? [/quote] No. Depending on the severeity of the offense, you could even be put on our eternal-ZI list. Evil us, we know.

[quote name='Voytek' timestamp='1330860982' post='2933148'] [img]http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4173/hackingn.jpg[/img] ok sherlock [/quote] Two things, - Your not very good at counting. - You seem to take offense to being told your not very good at counting. - What does his sig have anything to do with it?

Nice treaty. You two [i]deserve[/i] each other.

[center][img]http://cn-warriors.com/flags/warriors-standard-600px.jpg[/img] [b]A [u]real[/u] statement from the Warriors[/b][/center] This was just stupid, but people make mistakes, we forgive and then move on. The opening post was not an official announcement of the Warriors, merely a statement by one of our more eccentric members. While tW has no problems should an SE alliance choose to 'endorse' us and send nations our way, we have never and will never 'endorse' a SE alliance. Furthermore, endorsement or no endorsement, tW is, always has, and always will be an indepently operated entity. Nations from SE alliances that 'endorse' us will receive no preferential treatment, but rather they will receive only the same individual treatment that we extend to all our members, regardless of their affiliation in worlds we do not care about and which we are not concerned. Perhaps the most terrible of offenses committed in the opening post was the blatant mutilation of the tW flag. The tW flag [b]must[/b] be properly proportioned and presented in high-quality at all times, and lennybronx neglected to do either of these things. Those who have legitimate reason to utilize our flag are always welcomed to contact us for a version of our flag suitable to their needs. For future reference, tW reserves the right to utilize all tools available, up to and including nuclear weaponry, to discourage nations from using our flag in an improper fashion. [b][u]Signed for the Warriors[/u][/b] [b]Hetfield[/b] Warlord Elder So let it be written, so let it be done.

What the hell is this?

[quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1330801376' post='2932581'] "It was all over a year ago, I swear." Don't use smf anyway. IPB ftw. For the license cost: just make like each person pay 10-20 dollars depending on the alliance's size. [/quote] Even phpBB3 is better then SMF.

[quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1330061452' post='2927307'] [i]/s/ Clash - Infra Hugger[/i] [/quote] Finally somebody calls Clash for what he is.

[quote name='Merk' timestamp='1330035830' post='2927011'] That was the reason I titled it what I did [/quote] Do us all a favor and disband.

[quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1330025310' post='2926882'] In addition to being completely classless in this public logdump, you also come off as ridiculously arrogant. I would have hoped the arrogant days of GRE died with the old incarnation. Guess I was wrong. [/quote] You know Sardonic, there are times during which I almost start to like you. This is not one of those times. Is standard DH operating policy to attempt to slander those who bring forth accusations against you and proceed to whine about it until your blue in the face? Because it certainly seems like it. Log-dumping that particular log is certianly no worse then saying "hey, go ghost these alliances and send tech deal money to UE"