Enamel32

Nobody wants that, but I think both coalitions are prepared for it. Maybe you're underestimating how upset people are with DH. That's true, you can rebuild the low tiers quickly with aid, but I wouldn't be so quick to suggest that we can't rebuild our upper tier, or that you're going to "secure your upper tier safety for 3+ years". From my current NS, I could probably rebuy up to 12K infra and 8K tech twice over. There are nations on both sides of the fence with better wc's than me. To address your last statement, eventually, you'll want to bow out for the sake of your allies, simply put. You can stay in the war, but you may not have any allies worth anything once the war's over. Or, worse, they'll want to roll you as much as everyone else for dragging them through the dirt. I should be explicit that my desire to roll you again in 6 months is my own, and not reflections of Sparta's or the coalitions intentions. We can all dream, can't we?

You assume that your nations have the gut to keep fighting a perpetually losing battle. FAN did it. Maybe you can too. But remember, FAN was never really the same after that, either. EDIT: besides, 1 nuke alone can do more damage than 18Mil for even tiny nations. Aid is a futile life support effort.

Thanks for the stats OS. They are very interesting. :)

That's an interesting statistic. I saw you fought tronix. I'm not worried though. CnG and smaller members in your alliance will be ground to a pulp, while the 100 members of your coalition's upper tier are "securing your own safety".

Excellent point. I actually like being able to choose whether or not to delete my war activity. If you want to go off the radar, it makes it more difficult, because even if you change AA's you still have a war record for 30 days. I deleted my war reason in my last round for that exact reason. EDIT: isn't it good enough to have battle reports in your inbox???

EDIT: Oh I apologize if I wasn't clear. I meant Upper tier is where wars really matter. And there should be no confusion, of course that's where wars really matter. Do I think you're coalition has a chance? No. The problem is these nations have just gotten too big evading war, picking on the absolute most vulnerable targets, or doing what have you. Imagine a baseball team of all pitchers. You might be able to strike out many of my guys, but they can't hit and they can't field. That doesn't change the fact that the pitcher is probably the most important position on the team. It's already showing that ultra high NS nations aren't really carrying much weight. They're just sitting around while any below ~75K ns is in perpetual war.

Lol, u mad? U seem, mad. DH rolled us twice over because they wanted to make XX/SF statistically insignificant. They used MJ to do so, and they succeeded. I'm not sure what to tell you beyond that. As I predicted months ago, DR is paying for their past actions now, because XX/SF don't have the numbers to do any fighting where the battles really matter, which is what MJ/DH/PF wanted in the first place over a year ago. XX/SF can't be blamed for that. As for your last remark, yep, we are meatshielding for DR right now. I'm a fucking proud-ass meatshield if it means you cunts get to bite the dust. It's end game. The only reason my nation still exists is because of my conviction to see DH and certain allies down and out for the count.

Definitely. I'm already pro-DH beat down again 3-6 months postwar. The knockout will come in time.

No?

TBF, MW has little stake in this war. It's honorable of them to want to stick by their allies, but they're just DH meat shields in a stacked deck at this point. Take a beating. Get out. Call it a day.

Congratz on peace! Don't pay for DH crimes! o/ UCON o/ DB4D o/ NEW o/ EQ

I think NPO of old and MK got the better of everyone in their respective days, but aye. NSO on the other hand, we've had some fun with them....not that that's much to brag about :ph34r: EDIT: And I wouldn't say my comments are immature. I just hold unrivaled hate for the entirety of your coalition.

MK and co. fails to achieve a PR break once again. I can't help but read this thread and smile. :)

All I see is butthurt platypuses complaining about getting the spanking they deserve as much as anyone. Burn them to the ground, NPO. TOP, your tears are like sweet sweet icewine. Someone, help me find the straw that GONOs nub gave a while back. I must slurp these up. OH....HERE IT IS!

Whoa! Big news! o/ Hawk o/ Merick o/ TTK

Somebody help me. Please, for the love of god! I'm laughing uncontrollably. DAMN YOU VODKA@A@!!!!!!!!!!

Well, sort of. In gameplay like CN, the team with fewer players is going to get to take more shots (nukes) than the team with more players. For example, a dude with 5 wars can only get nuked once. Therefore he can inherently do more damage....assuming he doesn't run out of nukes, and isnt a complete retard, etc, etc. Maybe it's the booze, but I suddenly got the great idea that DH should adopt the coalition slogan, "we're not complete retards".

OMG! YES! Rush Sykes Johnny Apocalypse Leet Guy Ardus I mean, what else could I ask for

I'd say it's actually harder to win when you have less targets, assuming all players have relatively similar abilities, which in CN, I'd say that's a fair assumption. "skill" and "patience/time" only give you a small advantage over the enemy, and nukes do a specific amount of damage, regardless of skill. Consider, you have 1 bullet: You're on a shooting range with 3 targets You're on a shooting range with 1 target If you have 3 targets to shoot at, you're going to get more hits as opposed to shooting at 1 target. I didn't say anything about ignoring tiers. What are you talking about? My point is comparing damage outputs is a facetious argument, because you can make the numbers look good or bad anyway you play them. It's not my fault your coalition has gotten so big dodging wars they can't hit anyone, and CnG is paying the price for it. Cry me a river.

Ahahaha, did someone really just post stats showing damage done between coalitions. The coalition with less nations always does more damage than The coalition with more nations, simply because the team with lesser nations has more opportunity to do damage. This can be simulated in a team deathmatch with players of equal skill. 1 guy vs 5, the one man team is always going to get the most kills on a player to player basis, but that doesn't mean he wins. This thread is drivel. I should have expected as much given the OP.

destroy them rnr!

lolol have fun you two!

Good, you got peace. NOW DECLARE WAR ON DH! ahahahahaha, NEW, ahahahahahahaha

Destroy them fark!