Land of True Israel

Wow, good stuff! Any news about reverse compatibility? That's what I like about my original PS3.

Medal of Honor was really good in the beginning, at least I found it to be enjoyable, but it seems like they quickly began losing momentum and couldn't quite keep up. BF3 was ok, however I am still somewhat of a stickler for good single player missions. A bit off topic, but I'd love to see the Red Dead series continue.

Excellent!. Thanks for the info. I am getting a bit excited about this one, but that isn't unlike rockstar to play with emotions via delays lol

I hear GTA V will be out on PS3 (pressing the limits), and then will release on PS4

That's all a matter of personal perspective. Either way is correct depending on who you ask.

Quite the interesting back and forth debate regarding who really declared on who. I think there is a lesson to be learned in this. You can't simply force standards upon another, regardless of how commonly accepted they have become; eventually somebody is likely abandon the status-quo. This is what happened here. The bubble of delusion surrounding some has been popped by the realization you can't control the internal policies of alliances who value their own sovereignty and refuse to be bound by standards favored by another. It's all rather subjective in nature. In this case, it's up to the opinion of the one making the war web, and nobody else. If you disagree, make your own war web to reflect your own outlook, but consider kicking the habit of trying to force others to conform to your way of thinking.

Exactly my point. So the attacking nation, if coordinating with other nations to destroy the defending nation, even though showing to have taken the most damage, may not be regretting it at all, due to the fact the defender is actually taking more overall damage.

These reports can be a bit deceptive at times, granted it's not a simple one on one battle. For example, if a nation is smart enough to allow the one with the highest tech to do the nuking on a specific target, yet takes a nuke daily, the war report will show that nation getting a beatdown, even though the enemy is the one who is being beaten to a pulp.

White Peace is as you defined, but you will always find somebody who attempts to twist it into a "surrender", or those who use the term simply to convince one to surrender and make doing so an easier pill for them to swallow; therefore still contradicting the definition. More often than not, dubbing WP as a surrender is used as a means to boost morale. I wouldn't waste too much energy on those who misuse the term. If somebody has to call it something else other than what it is, it only reflects on their own inadequacy.

Excellent. I always look forward to these.

Good point made. I am one of those who oppose the placing of armed guards in schools, but mostly because we could end up with another TSA type situation. Allow teachers and school staff their right to carry a firearm, and there would be no need for guards. These "Gun Free Zones" are invitations to homicidal maniacs.

Then "common people" are brain-dead morons who don't care about potentially losing their freedom and constitutional rights at the whim of a corrupt government.

He forgot drinkability

Coke and Pepsi have a tremendous difference in taste.