Dcrews

Why am I suppose to take your word that it is fact if you have no evidence to support your claim. These boards can serve as a taste of real politiking for those who don't frequent irc on a daily basis, surely it won't hurt to share some of your ideas. That's what this topic is for isn't it? Side note, treaty and drop someone who are they? Thoughts on the war's progress? What is something about Umb most people don't know?

You have to change one decision Umb has made in the recent past, what is it and why? Did DH really seek to befriend DR or is this just spin, if so, mind showing some proof to support your claim. How do you see post war playing out

This should be interesting.

Treaty someone you aren't tied to in the opposite coalition, drop an existing treaty, which alliances, why?

Not sure of you saw this last time, thanks for the responses so far as well.

If someone needs to have on quality to succeed at this game, what would it be, why. You have to change on decision your alliance made in the past, what is it, why?

Props to the Clique for your performance thus far. Managing to out damage the larger coalition is an accomplishment to be proud of. No spin here, props. However you must recognize as the larger coalition we can afford to take more damage. Boasting of your achievement is good for propaganda, however if we're speak without spin here, something more practical is needed if you want to argue a more favorable exit. Until then, we will continue to pound away.

Biggest regret, proudest moment and why.

War is real

Congratz on peace. Good luck rebuilding.

Good luck guys. Have fun.

No offense op, but MK was way better in calling their opponets out. May want to go take the course over again. Also, obligatory thread is pointless.

Congratz on peace.

Any chance on giving a bit of an explanations with suggestions, for those of us who are CN history nerds. :3

Congratz to all parties.

I didn't coin the term, one of your buddies did the favor for me in the rouge senator thread. The fact that they decided to bother hitting him even though he is strategically insignificant is even worse. Hell, if it was a strategic move at least you could reason it out. This crap a sanctioning for lulz for no apparent rhyme or reason and thinking you could without a response is why people your friends in the Kingdom are so popularly disliked.

Nice try to appear moderate but your side is clearly trying to paint NPO as hegemonist controllers which is false. Your side is trying to paint the AA's involved on our side as shady backstabbers which is false. NPO entered at the request of an ally. If they weren't asked they wouldn't be here. The alliances in the Eq coalition on the TOP front wouldn't leave Ai. To insinuate that as the reason for NPO's entry is ridiculous. The welfare of your alliance rest with your leaders. I'm sure they'll do what's best. If being recked for a couple more months is what they decide, who am I to criticize that.

Oh, did someone accidentally hit the sanction button? No? Then please stop posting. Trying to bs away an underhanded move doesn't fly with anyone who doesn't drink your cool aid.

So, because his nation isn't big it doesn't matter? The real problem was an attempt to set a horrible precedent, and the utter lack of any shed of decency on the part of MK. However the act was highly characteristic, so may be just another day in The Kingdom. When you punch someone, it is not a phenomena when you get punched back.

Actually, you're the ones twisting the truth, you're the ones derp- terpreting Brehon's quote to suit your agenda, you're the ones misquoting loggs of Ted and Brehon. Dude, don't paint your propaganda as reality. First of all, it is not even good propaganda, anyone with any reading comprehension can see what you are trying to do and insisting on it even after people have thoroughly rebuffed you is getting a bit sad. Pacifica was brought in for one reason, to help smash you into submission and relieve some of the false hope your alliance has when it comes to this war. You are getting out of this one way, if it takes additional pressure in the form of Pacifian might to have you see the light, that is exactly what will happen.

So it was ok to sanction HoT under the policy of, "win by any means" but MK nations get sanctioned and now everyone has to play nice. Well, you reap what you sow. Try not to hurt yourselves back-peddling.

An official explanation is given for an announcement, but it doesn't help our political agendas. Lets make up another that does and repeatedly throw it in people's faces so maybe they'll eventually believe us. Darn, TOP and friends beat me to it. Next time.

Oh, I wasn't calling you "Pacifica's Clique" I'm calling your coalition: MK, Umb, CnG and co "The Clique" comes from a pretty neat propaganda piece made by a MK artist.

I'm certianly not calling you Competence, but The Clique works for me as a coalition, so I think I'll stick with that. I'll give you that I did seem to have glossed over it albeit not in an attempted to make my comment, it was just an observation. It is not hard to miss your remark, giving that it is in the middle of a flame war :P. I seemed to be a bit lazy myself.

The actual question we should all be asking is, why hasn't Pacifica's Clique allies wished them luck? Pretty sure they gave you guys some recognition in your ventures. It would only be common curiosity to reciprocate.