snibbmaster

Errr...Debatable.

[quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1284261085' post='2450522'] When TOP hit them in the BiPolar war they complained a lot about getting hit in order to distract people from the big picture, that TOP was entering to help NpO/NSO/GATO/STA and everyone else who entered the war started by NpO declaring on \m/. The sheer amount of posts from them complaining about being hit before they had officially entered the war in order to get STA, NpO and GATO to switch sides must be why MK is winning. I don't know why you mention NSO, they don't whine much if any. [/quote] I don't know, whatever they did it seemed to work. This poll would be missing some choices, but it included NPO so i'm covered.

[quote name='brentbee' timestamp='1284176870' post='2449467'] it is almost funny. Just almost. [/quote] fail grammar is fail...

Congratz on the protectorate!

It would be a way for you to get ultimate revenge on society.

Happy Birthday, and congratz

very good point Antoine. I can't say I'm concerned. What will be will be.

Maybe he can replace Ralph Nader when he goes.

Well, as usual, an interesting conversation.

Planet Steve?

Well then, since I can't see it, i'll just move on to my next question. What purpose do you think this blog serves?

A famous dutch Philosopher named Huizinga once said "if you go through life questioning everything, you will eventually be forced to question yourself." So perhaps it's best you don't do that? After all, this is but a game. A game needs controversy, otherwise it becomes dull (which is, by the way part of the reason people are leaving).

I'll bet they aim to take over the real world too

No no no people are attacking you because you seem to continue a grudge that is long over. The NPO has been released from its bonds, and right now is not under any punishment. You are, after all the only pro NPO blogger left on the forums who speaks out often about issues which seem to be gone. That without a doubt makes you a target. Not to mention the fact that a vast majority of this game is based in the United States, and as I said America is not fond of anything that reminds them of the Reds (which in this case is Francoism). I for one am open minded, but I don't represent the feelings of most people here. EDIT: The only reason I argue is because it's a good laugh.

Vlad I've done this before. Its all boredom, or a game, or both. But it seems silly to blame a natural population loss of a game on Karma. Almost like a...cop out. Also, If I may ask a personal question. These aren't ideas you believe in real life are they? Being a communist/fascist/anarchist can be a dangerous thing for your health in America. That is, unless you live elsewhere.

This post was made out of boredom.

o/ SF! Here's to many more years [u]of awesomeness[/u]!

Well, it seems like the solution he has only ever provided is that OTHERS need to do more about it. It's not a solution if the proposer doesn't take some responsibility for making it happen. Craig seems to be right. The only thing that comes from this blog (other than a great place to argue ) is complaints. And "Karma should fix it" is hardly a solution.

Well of course they would say something like that! It's propaganda!

[quote name='xoindotnler' date='07 September 2010 - 02:15 PM' ]But they do have a common interest, common views points etc etc. Can't call that two poles but just one pole. . Well I guess this is a matter of definition then. But you do have a point. In regards to the trend in online games, I've noticed it myself. Frankly the console has drawn many people away from online browser based games such as this.

Right, that's why I was asking. Frankly I'm not quite sure what your saying. Are you blaming the player loss on Karma, or are you saying that Karma has forgotten about it now that it no longer serves their purposes? Also Xion, that is hardly the point (and both of those blocs would argue that you are wrong anyway). It would be like calling the NPO and NpO one alliance.

Hold up a tick, the world is definitely multi-polar, or at least more so than it has been in several years. We have C&G, then we have SF, and TOP and what's left of what was once called the Citadel. And don't forget ex hegemony. That doesn't sound like a terribly uni-polar world to me. Just because some of them happen to have a diplomatic dialog going doesn't mean they are united. Now I know that's not the point of this article entirely, but I thought I should get that cleared up. Otherwise, interesting perspective.

[quote name='PotFace' timestamp='1283569892' post='2441051'] While we can attribute power more to an alliance's political connections rather than the military strength of an alliance itself, this balance in itself seems to have an effect on whether or not an alliance is willing to march to war. [/quote] Frankly it really is all about who your friends are. The strength of your alliance is important, but if you have no allies to back you up, your alliance may think twice before it starts pulling its weight around.

The[i][b] People's[/b][/i] Government?[i] Fasten your seat belts Ladies and Gentlemen, we will be landing in North Korea very shortly.[/i] [i] [/i] EDIT: That aside, cool format for a speech.