Jump to content

USOFAA

Members
  • Posts

    150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by USOFAA

  1. Welcome to the fight NV i have heard nothing but good things about you. I look forward to seeing you on the battle field.
  2. [img]http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c102/lawgiver/images.jpg[/img]
  3. [quote name='Nihilist Tyrant' timestamp='1295671037' post='2590827'] So what makes them a 'terrible alliance'? [/quote] Look at his alliance and end it there lol
  4. Good luck STA have not been around long but i have always liked STA. So here is to a good fight
  5. Well best of luck to everyone in this. I bet i see where GATO gets into this
  6. Looking for someone with Coal and Marble. I have Oil & Uranium can be a temp well i get taxes and you get nukes or you can replace the drop out from our trade circle. Thanks 8 BR trade cirlce
  7. Yes 1,000 Nukes well 1,014 now lol o/Wf O/Green
  8. O/ ERA Congrats on the thankless leadership job
  9. [quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' timestamp='1282687571' post='2429936'] With a triple break off flank attack no doubt. 1.5m NS isn't that much for the big raiders, especially if you have no protectorate. [/quote] I wish the alliance that does that the best. with like 30 of there 44 nations having Nukes. And a avg of 34k NS that would not be a raid it would be a war that no one would win!! 44 nations and almost 350 nukes not bad at all
  10. O/ AcTI i am all for it. The treaty web sucks lol everyone has something bad to say about the treaty web. Till someone drops a treaty or two then that is what they whine about, till it dies down then they whine about the treaty web some more.
  11. O/ Peace I wish everyone the best in rebuilding
  12. Hmm and i always looked up to VE i guess O/VE what did you do
  13. [quote name='grahamkeatley' timestamp='1282126327' post='2421454'] I am not very often annoyed enough to post on OWF. But... You are an idiot! From one of the posts below, ERA have posted Recruitment messages not just to TOOL members and Applicants but to other alliances as well. How many of those alliances declared War on ERA for it? Zero. I imagine most approached you like TOOL did, diplomatically to explain to you the error in your ways. Demand a cease and desist until you and your members were "trained" in how to find unaligned nations to recruit. We did not run around to check your protection status, treaty partners and simply declare war. You aren't exactly treating others how you have been treated and I expect you to get a proper smack the next time you step out of line, even slightly, towards someone else. GK [/quote] Ranging from harrassing and threatening messages to recruitment messages to join their alliance. Want to point that out we have no clue whats going on they are not giving us much info.It could be bad its one thing to say please join us (Works for you can't do that. So don't let it happen again) To join now or i am going to ZI you.
  14. [quote name='Mr Damsky' timestamp='1282154715' post='2421799'] We stand by NPO! *cancels treaty when NPO is about to get rolled* Yeah, no :/ [/quote] I was not around then but from what i seen there was a lot of that. More then just one alliance for sure
  15. Shows you how it works out to kick out a well liked member when most of your Gov is ready to stand behind him. You all should have never backed off the reps. Perhaps not went to war but at lest said we need to think about this whatever works for you. Or even told STA well after the wars are over this ends would work for us. MM would been happy with that i am sure he just wanted blood or reps. You turned your back on someone you should have not, And you did not even work hard to make something happen that would save face for your alliance and your member. And now your paying the price for it. I do not see this working out well for you. If your going to treat members like this who is going to want to be part of your alliance.Man MM took a heck of a beating for you all in the NpO war what a slap lol really
  16. I just wanted to ask something, is that wF or the nation that attacked you? because if its just the nation that attacked you well by wF standards your well within your rights to so. And wF will not step in its in our charter wF may raid nations not in a alliance or in a one man alliance , But if a nation fights back wF will not step in to help. Just a heads up on us filling up your war slots like someone else said. Not sure why he would want to raid someone with nukes in the first place?
  17. Well perhaps this what we need lol i for one hope \m/ does do something. Anything that messes with the treaty web is alright with me. And let me tell you this war for sure will. If it happens that is
  18. Seeing as how everyone else seems to be standing behind the attacker. I will support ERA on this if money is given to the other side i will do what i can to help you
  19. I was thinking this would die down when i went to bed last night. Looks like we may be getting that war after all
×
×
  • Create New...