Louisa

Since I have no picture making abilities, I am reduced to misquote a film that I saw this weekend as my contribution: [quote][i]This is my avy, This is my sig-- One is too small, The other's too big.[/i][/quote] Dedicated to mr "I [b]am[/b] ... in a world ... of poop!" [img]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r7/Louisa00/emot-love.gif[/img]

[quote name='Cable77' timestamp='1283263647' post='2437019'] That's why I prefaced with the above statement. I do acknowledge we had help. And you can acknowledge we didn't fall like a rock despite all those battles. [/quote] Well, I possibly could, except I have no idea what was going on then (I am not sure if I was playing then, maybe it was between my re-rolls). And it was not a attack on your performances, just a general statement against your phrasing. Sorry to have offended

[quote name='Jesse End' timestamp='1283263284' post='2437012'] When the stagger has been ruined, therefore all 3 wars expire at the same time, how do you plan on re-establishing a stagger by attacking just before update and again just after update without leaving any slots open for 24 hours? [/quote] I was talking of the first day, the day that the rogue actually goes rogue. One attack that same day (before Update), another just after Update and he is automatically staggered. Of course, if [b]all three slots[/b] are already full of raiders, that is impossible and so some thing else needs to be done. Like use some diplomacy hoping to get the raiders out. Still, what do I know -- I have only ever raided twice: once in the very first Tournament when I rogued the Old-GOONS leadership, and once a few months ago when I proved so bad at it that I showered my target in cash (much more than enough to pay the damages) [img]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r7/Louisa00/awesomepwn.gif[/img]

[quote name='Cable77' timestamp='1283252169' post='2436926'] But, we were engaged with IRON, GGA, MCXA, NADC, Echelon, and TUF all at once. And still held on to the #1 spot. [/quote] I have always hated statements like this, because they are so silly. They give the impression that you all by yourself had to face six Alliances, and fails to mention that all those Alliances had to fight others beside you. (Why not mention all your allies helping you out against this dirty half-dozen?) Number of Alliances involved means nothing. Also, useless poll, will not vote

[quote name='Aeternos Astramora' timestamp='1283235914' post='2436808'] Because then you don't get [i]any[/i] slots. Additionally, if the nation can hit peace mode, you MUST attack with at least one person immediately after midnight. [/quote] Well, I meant as your first response, the same day that he first attacks you. Since the offender just went rogue on your Alliance that day, he is at war and cannot go to Peace Mode. Then you put one attacker on him just before Update, and another just after Update. This way you control the staggers yourself. Did that make better sense of what I wanted to say? (But in a way I must commend raiders who are apparently so active that they respond to rogue attacks on other Alliances within minutes or hours that first day ) (WorldConqueror -- [OOC?] it is not slot filling if they actually attack, you know.)

Not that I really care, but why not wait until Update approaches and then do a proper stagger yourself (2-1 or 1-2, at your leisure) instead of this immediate response and then leaving at least 1 slot free for hours, basically inviting in free raiders?

Freeboard! Freeboard! What is the current despotical regime's views on nautical matters such as freeboards? /s/ first-time questioner, long-time nautocrat

[quote name='Titus Pullo' timestamp='1283220678' post='2436461'] Longbowe is so admirable that he is able to freely replace any vowal in a sentence with an "a". [/quote] I think you will find that the word you are looking for is sentance, Titus Pollo. [color="#808080"][size="1"]Longbowe for Most Adorable 2010?[/size][/color]

Schrödinger . . . Porksaber . . . leaders nonpareil, innovators far beyond mortal ken, your future overlords. So maybe they have trouble spelling their own names correctly, as in using umlaut and actual letters, but that is mere details; the important thing, the datum that will invade your brain and gently but insistently hammer away on your frontal joining lobe, is that they are the wave of the future. Yes, in a year every leader will be exactly as our distinguished duo—only too late, since Messieurs Schrodinger et p0rkSab3r will by then have had a full year to evolve into the next stage of Alliance Leadership: [i]the Penultimate Step[/i], where Man and Machine join to share synapses and perfect the business of statsmanship. And they will do this through skill, sentimentality, showmanship and sassiness. So join SLCB now. Do it before it becomes the “in” thing to do. Join now and be guaranteed a position as high as you prefer. [size="1"][NB. Offer restricted to Rerollapalooza and environs.][/size] [b][size="3"]SLCB[/size][/b]—their guns are loaded with wonderfulitude, their caissons with irrepressibilitiveness, their underwaterfloatingvessels with a sort of cardstock related to balsa, their. . . . But why reveal all their internal secrets in public? Join—join, and you too can be a Liberian, free to roam Bob and purge yourself in the fields of Purple!

[quote name='PotFace' timestamp='1282965452' post='2433446'] [i]spume[/i] . . . This is pretty simple stuff, here. Do try and keep up. . . . [i]spume[/i] [/quote] You strike me as a very upset young nation ruler, which is sort of hilarious at this time of night in Rerollapalooza. Could I interest you in some anger management perhaps? (Low low prices!) + congratulations etc to Ragnarök & SUN

[quote name='zzzptm' timestamp='1282880353' post='2432394'] All current CBs should stand as they are. They make sense in an IC way, so they should stay. [/quote] Oh well that ends your proposal in my view, since any CB is acceptable (to the attacking side, which is the one Declaring). PS. I cannot see this as a Role-Playing Game since there is no "character" for me to play -- all I have is a country with a few numbers, and that does not qualify as a "character" in my view. Sorry.

[quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1282714992' post='2430551'] [color="#0000FF"]The only thing we have said contradictory to the terms is that though we signed that statement, it is quite blatantly false. Of course we did still sign it, and I am sure RoK and friends will be sure to bring that up in the future (it is why they had us sign it after all), but as far as we're concerned it isn't the truth that happened.[/color] [/quote] Are you saying that you never surrendered? Your protean facts are rather amusing. [color="#0000FF"]My frogmen successfully attached a explosive device below the waterline of your naval vessel.[/color] [img]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r7/Louisa00/louisasith.gif[/img]

[quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1282534959' post='2427223'] Beats calling them Trashcan. [/quote] Well maybe so, but [url="http://z15.invisionfree.com/Cyber_Nations/index.php?showtopic=73765&st=80&#entry7914583"]this[/url] is still a pretty great post (Sorry my first Alliance...) Oops forgot to vote this week too.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1282773233' post='2431205'] The old GOONS doesn't hosted shark week just one year after they came to cyberverse too. . . . [/quote] Neutral Shoving: [url="http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Goon_Order_of_Neutral_Shoving"]Founded[/url] July 24, 2006 Shark Week [url=http://z15.invisionfree.com/Cyber_Nations/index.php?showtopic=70449]begins[/url]: May 26, 2007 That looks like 10 months to me, so I guess we are overdue...? (And I will go on the record to say that I thought then -- even as I was in NpO -- and still do think that Shark Week was the Best Thing Ever(tm) and if that makes me immoral scum then so be it.)

Well this was a strangely developing thread. Congratulations on your treaty, VE-GOONS, I wish you the very best. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1282759626' post='2431020'] Their High War Adjudicator is the same. [/quote] Shame on you for making me believe that ToeCutter was back Also every body stop fighting, we all know I am the only real goon around here, look I even took out the top echelon all on my own back in my younger days: [img]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r7/Louisa00/GOONS/triumf.jpg[/img]

How dare you call me a hater prok. PS. :3 and congratulations

Install ROMMELHSQ as Emperor, then we can talk details

[quote name='MConorDever' timestamp='1282748585' post='2430848'] Tosh13 is the Leader 0f N.O [/quote] It must be difficult having him as leader and role model; I still remember his "diplomatic efforts" from the Black Team Forum in 2006. How ever it does explain a few things. Also the answer is BAPS.

Muun, for that game he made and also for that time that he flexed his muscles for me on webcam [img]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r7/Louisa00/emot-love.gif[/img]

[quote name='Aimee Mann' timestamp='1282572300' post='2427711'] It's amazing that people who have no knowledge of the current internal workings of \m/ think that responses like "Eh, Marx is a good guy. I vote for him", "Marx isn't so bad" and "I, for one, like and support Marx" are valid counters to detailed descriptions of what is actually going on... [/quote] His Imperial Majesty Marx once talked to me on IRC, and did not even yell at me, thus I support him. Seriously, I have no problem with things working as what I quoted from your post. I much more trust people that I know when they say some thing, rather than believing strangers or official Alliance announcements. Of course, if it turns out that they said false things, then I would not particularly trust them the next time, but I cannot actually see why I should trust Young Master Swanfield here, who I never even heard of until a few days ago, when he only comes in with basically hearsay and no evidence. This is not restricted to \m/ in any way of course -- I find myself liking STA just a bit more after I saw my dear Trevor had gone there

[b]Have you ever been in an alliance you have previously been at war with?[/b] 1. Yes [i]-- or vice versa really (I was Polar in GW3, then in TOP fighting them for NoCB)[/i] [b]Is one of your current treaty partners (ODP+) an alliance you (as a nation, not an alliance) have previously been at war with?[/b] 2. No -- [i]I have no treaty partners[/i] [b]Have you ever switched sides of the treaty web?[/b] 1. Yes, I joined an alliance on the other side. [i]-- from LOSS (GW2) to NpO (GW3)[/i] ---------- Maybe I did more stuff, I have basically forgot every thing between the Unjust and NoCB wars, and every thing since then to like a week ago Looking at things via Alliances is so limiting, I prefer to count things in friends. I think my oldest friend on Bob is one of my first enemies from when we was on opposite sides in GW2. Friends > Alliances, no matter what Alliance me and said friend(s) are in at the moment. Also I pity people who spend their entire career in one Alliance and never get to see the wonders that is a new community and new people who do things differently.