Banned

You must be new here.

o/ stonewall14. Really i am just here to confirm the protection detail. Claude approves of this protection.

Knew this was gonna happen before Darrin did. Gratz,

American coffee obsession is rooted in British tea obsession.

I'm in shock that my picture wasn't just of a spreadsheet based on your repeated perception of me.

Comic gold, the hershey standard.

I'm gone for 2 weeks and GATO goes off getting older while I'm away? Unsat, you guys are already old enough. Also, happy birthday.

But do you have a deal?

Last Activity: Active Three Weeks Ago

This is bigly.

May this transition make all our brothers feel more at home than ever before. Farewell Atlas, and all the best in your new homes. Treat them well GATO, but I know you will.

Sure, I'm working from some generalities. And often times things aren't so black and white. As such, in the case of one nation pulling some rogue action from an AA, a lot of things are generally taken into consideration. What is that nations position in the alliance (actions of standing gov members are generally viewed as being held to a much higher standard than standard members), what is the already existing diplomatic landscape (rogue actions from nations that share treaty ties could reasonably be expected to be dealt with somewhat differently than rogue actions taken between alliances that share a troubled past or that have no diplomatic contact at all). Still, it's a damn generous thing to make any attempts at a diplomtic solution when 3 nations from the AA start launching wars at you, and something that should never be considered universally expected behavior. That wasn't something that was being closely tracked, and there's no reasonable expectation to believe that an initial reaction by Alpha Wolves or anybody would have instantly assumed that. I wasn't even personally aware of those multis until the situation arose, and yes, I notified you of what I discovered in the process. Regardless of your awareness of the charges, and the obvious attacks coming from your AA that you couldn't miss, you made a decision, fully aware of what the response to that decision would be. It's not like what was on the table was left blank when razgriz discussed the matter with you. So if you're a victim of anything, it's by your own choice.

Absolutely disagree. If one nation goes rogue and the head of state says "sure, come and get him" that's one thing. When 3 nations do it, and the head of state takes such a "meh" posture on the matter, it's absolutely fair game to assume the alliance as a whole has become fair game. If 2 or more isn't a conspiracy, then where is the magic cutoff? If IRON (used as an example) with its 262 nations only attacks you with 261 of them, but their leader says "well, that other one harbors no ill will" then what, you shouldn't hit him too? One nation hitting you is usually at best a sketchy CB, 3 nations from one AA going after your AA and your allies? Giving the alliance that does that any kind of an opportunity to resolve the situation without bloodshed is being generous.

I would like to congratulate everybody involved on the achievement of peace on this front of the current conflict, my coalition allies on victory, and our opponents on their tenacity in a hard-fought war. You may now return to your regularly scheduled programming.

Good fight, and best of luck with everything moving forward.

A senator and a PoW from the same nation? o/ VG!

Who's hugging? I'm not in PM.

Pick me!

welcome to the party

And beyond.

o/ Last Call.

Exactly what did he say that wasn't true? Other than missing the part about Europia coming in for a 2nd round against the same SLAP member that Kindle attacked, everything looked pretty spot on.

Roal, there seems to be a serious misunderstanding on your part here that I won't bother to quote the multiple posts in where you make it. For some reason, you seem to believe that SLAP and Atlas protection should immediately become some situation which covers retroactive problems. That protection comes with no agreement to seek reps from Varangian Guard nor from Federation of Cobra for damages done prior to their war. What TMG can expect from us is protection from the point of signing forward. They can expect that SLAP and Atlas will make a reasonable effort to aid them in seeking a prosperous future in multiple facets of the game, including their economic state. But expecting this to create drama in coalition channels? There is no expectation for that, and it isn't going to happen.

On a sidenote, effective immediately, Sovereign League of Armed Powers is protecting The Mages Guild.

Honored that you would join us Atlas. I got a full bottle, a rag, and a lighter ready to mix some molotovs.