FreddieMercury

Memoryproblems should totally jump ship and come fight here with us :) Also sup guys!

Welcome to the fray boys :)

Memory, please sell all your infra and tech so I can come love you.

Always liked and respected you guys. Good luck and have fun.

Woah now, Uruk is a very sensitive soul. We don't want to upset him too much now.

Boy, TOP is much better off without you at the helm. Most of TOP I can respect as they are mature enough to rise above general pointless OWF dung flinging, you on the other hand wallow in your over-inflated ego. You could learn a thing or two from your compatriots.

[quote name='Devilyn Caster' timestamp='1323509638' post='2872358'] In all honesty I don't know much about NADC's ability to fight; granted, I haven't ever heard a positive word about them in my 4+ years here. Declaring on the least politically tied alliance isn't particularly helping my impression of them either. [/quote] [quote][color=#1C2837][size=2]You think that you get less damage by declaring on the smallest alliances, but you are wrong.[/size][/color][color=#1C2837][size=2] [/size][/color][/quote] [color=#1C2837][size=2][/size][/color][quote] [color=#1C2837][size=2]So brave, NADC. You're really doing MCXA a service. [/size][/color][color=#1C2837][size=2] [/size][/color] [/quote] Hahahahaha oh god this is rich, you all seriously think NADC is running around like a scared little dog hugging their precious infra? Jesus you guys are retarded. NADC declared on MK and Umb last war and was fighting TOP for 2+ months (iirc) and they didn't come out until their allies did, as for the insults, they've heard it all before and from far more eloquent and intelligent people (hint, they and their allies still don't give a !@#$). So you're not going to damage their reputation in any tangible way, nor their feelings, so please continue on with this circus-- you're only making yourselves look like fools.

[quote name='Londo Mollari' timestamp='1321822908' post='2847597'] Bow your head! [/quote] I won't deny that this joke announcement lacked wit and was pointless, but your remarks are on par. [color=#1C2837][size=2][quote]Ahahahahahahahahaha NADC was never in charge of anything.[/quote][/size][/color] [color=#1C2837][size=2] [/size][/color] [size="2"][color="#1c2837"]Actually, NADC was in charge of GUARD. Can't say the same for Athens, who for most of its existence, was one of the many alliances in C&G suckling under MK's teet. [/color][/size]

!@#$, NSO won.

o/ IAA BTA NsO You guys did your fair share, especially BTA who were able to mount a respectable effort given the internal issues they were having and of course NsO. Classy folks, hope you all have a swift rebuilding process.

Wow, you missed the entire point of his post. If you've spent your time playing any multiplayer game it's plainly observable that relationships built on it are ephemeral, it's like trading friendly banter with a person on the streets you'll never see again. His post is actually quite insightful.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1304811628' post='2708257'] Fun fact: 18 nations of the Umbrella top 20 had less casulities than me who (and because of that) never was above 90k NS and there are people who still glorify Umbrella because they have big nations, for you who are jealousy of Umbrella learn how to build an alliance like them: 1- Always chose the winner side 2- Don't get too involved in the fight, send meatshields instead. 3- Brag about your stats. [/quote] Yup, TOP was a much more fearsome alliance at their stats peak. Umbrella was like the smaller brother who didn't come close.

[quote name='Drai' timestamp='1301066047' post='2676055'] So maybe when you come to an alliance for peace twice, and then decline white peace both times, you should actually think about what you're doing. Enjoy this NADC, you deserve it. [/quote] You mean the one time our gov came to discuss just the possibility of it? Yeah ok. [quote] How the hell does that even go? NADC: "Hey were looking for peace, what kind of terms are you thinking of?" DoomHouse: "White Peace." NADC: "BOLLOCKS!" Storms out. Seriously, that has to be the dumbest thing I've heard in quite some time.[/quote] I think that sounded more witty in your head.

[quote name='potato' timestamp='1300628677' post='2671055'] It's that history and the respect gained during our battle that strengthened our ties. Sure, we don't agree on everything all the time but that's normal, isn't it? To try and spin this as gaping fractures that are going to get either of us killed is both dumb and ignorant. As well as far fetched.[/quote] Hey I appreciate the defensiveness and all, but I don't insinuate the worst will happen. In fact, good luck. [quote] Of course, I don't expect NADC to understand the concept of having an independant thought. Nor am I trying to convince you of anything. [/quote] The wounds, they burn.

[color=#1C2837][size=2][/size][/color][quote] [color=#1C2837][size=2]Of course, Freddie, free speech and all that. Some of the gov has reported good dealings with you guys to the general membership and I got excited at the prospect of normalizing or even improving relations after the war. Especially since we're both in on treaty obligations and there's nothing personal. Trash talking an alliance like your alliance mate here, though, can really get under the skin sometimes. But that's fine, war time can inflame opinions.[/size][/color] [/quote] All of my TOP opponents have been great thus far. Maybe next round I'll get small enough to pay your nation a visit, old friend? [quote name='potato' timestamp='1300622480' post='2671030'] Wait... does NADC seriously believe MK and TOP are at each other's throats? [/quote] Obviously you're not enemies at the moment and you guys will work hard at keeping a fruitful relationship going, but given the history between the two alliances I doubt you can convince most that those gaping fracture points don't exist. Plus it's smart to have a plan B, eh?

I think it goes without saying that what Avenger's saying doesn't represent the NADC, I would say most people in NADC would not agree with what he is saying but he's free to have his own assertions. [quote name='Kzoppistan' timestamp='1300616975' post='2671014'] Allying with MK was a hell of a surprise move. The two alliances locked in a death struggle only months before? Who saw that coming? Brilliant, imo. [/quote] Comon, I think both of us ( as do most people ) see the daggers both MK and TOP have for each other. It'll just be interesting to observe if TOP is able to build a stronger hand with what it has to work with at the moment. [color=#1C2837][size=2][/size][/color]

[quote name='Salmia' timestamp='1299415573' post='2654361'] I will just say this - when you resign, you take with you the power to make any difference. Some people choose alliances that are wrong for them and then end up trying to change it to something that it isn't. Internal disagreements happen, you can make the choice to stay in the alliance and attain a position where you actually can make a difference/influence the direction or you can choose to run off and finish your part in the alliance. You made your choice, there should be no surprise when they demasked you after your resignation. A resignation isn't a place to discuss things or to stage a final turn "debate". You had other avenues of trying to talk to government, working with the decision made or leaving. You made your choice. [/quote] Not necessarily true, look at what Van Hoo's resignation from RoK did for RoK's foreign policy this war. A HUGE difference was made.

Hello there, my name is Goldie and I am an attention whore.

[quote name='PatBrown1413' timestamp='1293343697' post='2554162'] If we have such terrible diplomatic skills then how do we always end up on the winning side? [/quote] I lol'd, really hard. No disputing that, NPO knows first hand. [quote] Your obviously a Sparta hater with no knowledge. If we didn't join this war you would probably saying we're cowards, and afraid to lose some pixels. So, it's a lose, lose situation. [/quote] ODN has quite the treaty list at its disposal and could have easily called upon more suitable opponents for Europa, furthermore judging from war-hawkish comments your gov have made in the open, you guys pushed for you own involvement. Which is understandable and all (who doesn't enjoy a war that they risk so little in) but to push yourselves as honorable allies who came into this war just to honor treaties is just laughable.

[quote name='SpiderJerusalem' timestamp='1292834860' post='2546278'] It is not about protecting NEW because they deserve it. It is about protecting NEW because Poison Clan has done the [b]exact same thing[/b] as NEW before, and have suddenly changed their moral view on the world because now it's convinient of them to do so. If Poison Clan had [i]any[/i] balls at all, they would have defended NEW, no matter what the consequences would be. Because, they don't have a NAP (Not that they wouldn't break that if they had to ), but they do have an obligation to [b]defend[/b] them through their M[b]D[/b]oAP. And as Poison Clan have so eloquently pointed out before, raiding dead alliances is perfectly fine. But when was this, I can't quite bring my mind to remember it [/quote] My god, this. I remember when PC raided a protectorate of Echelon and proceeded to rub their e-peen stating some bull about the Wiki entry being outdated.

I remember people were complaining about the price of movie tickets that were like 11$. But adjusting for inflation the price of movie tickets have stayed pretty stable. Plus taking a girl to a decent sit down restaurant costs at least 20 dollars, and you sh*t that stuff out a day later. Good luck reselling it. Alot of fun things in life costs money, deal with it.

ex-hege trash, grats, etc.

[quote name='DictatatorDan' timestamp='1286892865' post='2482380'] [color="#ff0000"]Needs more Mushroom Kingdom. VE [/color] [/quote] fix'd

This move deserves a lot of respect, you are giving up what could be your sole dominance on Planet Bob in order to make things less predictable and more enjoyable for your loyal members. o/