Jump to content

elpadrino

Members
  • Posts

    245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by elpadrino

  1. maybe they were good at war but they suck so hard at peace, 2months after the war and they are all already deleted ...
  2. the only reasonable solution to this is war ....
  3. congrats Methrage and good luck to the new alliance Nexus o/ Nexus
  4. so finally.., would MHA defend the gRAMlins if someone try to help IRON to get reasonable peace terms? and would CnG and co. let the recently surrendered alliances to go to war over this? or would they be attacked if they try to help them? I don´t want to read it all...
  5. Oh, the brave new Grämlins ...
  6. hopefully The Grëmlins will get reasonable in their conditions for peace good luck Methrage
  7. I don´t like the reps, I´m a white peace fan so much credit to FAN, GATO and the rest of the white peacers ... but congrats to all on getting peace
  8. congrats Peron may IRON shine under your guidance!
  9. ouh yeah! good treaty o/ NSO o/ INVICTA
  10. casualties in Cantabria 1,923,550 Attacking + 3,743,160 Defending = 5,666,710 Casualties
  11. they request polaris help but they don´t help the polars in their wars even when there is not conflicting treaties (VE, GOD etc...)
  12. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='05 February 2010 - 12:56 AM' timestamp='1265331401' post='2159875'] I look forward to it. I have 3 slots open if you ever get out of anarchy; if not I call dibs on one of your slots when they open up. [/quote] haha see you there if we ever get out of anarchy
  13. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='05 February 2010 - 12:31 AM' timestamp='1265329888' post='2159795'] You're forgetting to mention a very important part of the story. NSO was the only alliance engaged in the Polar-\m/ War with treaty ties to TOP, IRON, DAWN or TORN. [/quote] irrelevant, there were more alliances in the war that everyone know that like them (did SF expected invicta to defend CnG?) it was obvious that while not directly treatied to this 4 there were many friends with that side of the treaty web in that war, FARK were just the only ones that took advantage of the situation the war with you and Fark is great and fun no matter the causes so lets talk in the battlefield
  14. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='05 February 2010 - 12:01 AM' timestamp='1265328093' post='2159721'] Whether or not it's the same war or two separate wars has nothing to do with it. Giving an alliance white peace just so that they can run off and attack one of your allies the next day is pointless. There's nothing "low" about it. Even the Sith have seen the wisdom of this in the past: [/quote] not related at all (the molon labe situation), everyone give peace considering that the war was about \m/ raiding smaller alliances and/or the racial incident with Grub, and \m/ recogniced what they were asked to the first day to achieve peace, then when everyone leaves some people use the excuse to satisfy not realted grudges, and thats my opinion but yeah maybe I´m wrong. Anyway less talk and more war!!
  15. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='05 February 2010 - 12:01 AM' timestamp='1265328093' post='2159721'] Whether or not it's the same war or two separate wars has nothing to do with it. Giving an alliance white peace just so that they can run off and attack one of your allies the next day is pointless. There's nothing "low" about it. [/quote] everyone peaced everyone because the \m/ war was over and given that we all joined to honor treaties it made no sense to keep fighting, its obvious that polar \m/ PC FOK ... peace at first considering that the rest will chain the peace soon as everyone was there just because of them..., and everyone peaced but when almost no one was still at war FARK decided to impose surrender terms to the NSO (not joining the next war with their treaty partners), FARK taken advantage of that situation was not the more moral move but anyway I play in a Sith teme alliance so I suppose that is a good move as long as you get profit from the situation
×
×
  • Create New...