Mergerberger II

Oh I see. Thanks guys.

So I've been having some trouble trying to bring my boys back home. Specifically, I'm having trouble trying to un-deploy soldiers. I recall having been able to put in a negative number and being able to un-deploy in that fashion. I deployed these troops at the end of the last war when my nation was smaller, and forgot about them until today. In trying to un-deploy, I have attempted to buy more soldiers but to no avail. I was told by my alliance to post this on these boards. Do you have a way to fix this or is it just a bug?

Well it should go without saying that Starfox101 does not speak for Polaris. Or are you just too dumb to understand that?

Did we? Must have escaped my eye. Could you please direct me to the post where this took place?

You deserve each other.

[quote name='Scorponok' timestamp='1349730918' post='3038706'] Good to see the review clauses becoming more common. Just remember who started it (Rise of the New Imperial Order Accords <3). Good luck tC. [/quote] I like the concept of a review clause very much. [quote name='Saniiro Matsudaira' timestamp='1349736379' post='3038745'] You guys are making me feel bad for Bloodfury. He is probably rolling around in his sleep due to this treaty. [/quote] Probably.

[center][img]http://i.imgur.com/0g7FZ.png[/img][/center] [center][size=5][b]The FrozenFury Collaborator Accords[/b][/size][/center] [center][quote][b]Article I: Nonaggression[/b] Both signatories will refrain from using military force, political subversion or espionage against one another. [b]Article II: Assistance[/b] Either signatory is within its rights to request military assistance, economic aid, or political intervention from the other signatory. While the other signatory is encouraged to provide the requested support, it is not required to. [b]Article III: Intelligence[/b] Should knowledge vital to the security of one signatory come to the attention of the other signatory, said signatory is required to share it. [b]Article IV: Review[/b] Both signatories agree to a mandatory three month review of this treaty. This is to ensure communication between and about each alliance in an effort to maximize the relationship between signatories. [b]Article V: Cancellation[/b] It is the hope of both signatories that this pact may last forever, or until the bond it represents grows to the point where an upgrade is merited. Given the uncertainties of the future, however, it is recognized that either signatory may cancel this pact after giving 72 hours notice.[/quote][/center] [b]Signed for the New Polar Order[/b] RandomInterrupt, Emperor Dajobo, Imperial Regent EaTeM_uP, Imperial Liaison Quantum Leap, Imperial Adviser of Foreign Affairs Medic32, Minister of Love Hullean, Minister of Peace Mompson, Minister of Plenty Mergerberger, Minister of Truth, Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass Nicki Nemesis, Deputy Minsiter of Love WarGod0001, Deputy Minister of Peace Vindicator, Deputy Minister of Plenty Kamerad von Kopfjäger BlutZorn, Deputy Minister of Truth, Tevron. [b]Signed for The Combine[/b] Overlord: Georgeguy Prime Minister: Starfox101 Minister of Internal Affairs: Incitatus Minsiter of Defense: Swatch0 Minister of Foreign Affairs: Spartacus1002

[quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1348715657' post='3034592'] Fixed that for you Sparta. [/quote] To be fair, Ghux's blitzes are legendary.

[quote name='Jacob Reiffenstein' timestamp='1348705772' post='3034493'] Grub, you better knock off your attacks against our Chancellor or else there's going to be real trouble between our alliances. As STA's Minister of Defence, I will confirm to you and every Polar on this thread that everything Pez has said and done during her tenures as Foreign Affairs Minister and Chancellor were done at the behest of Tyga and with his full backing. Her words were [u]HIS[/u] words. If you don't like it, then take it up with him. This thread just confirms that STA made the right move in cancelling the Permafrost Treaty. It's a crying shame that we did not do it sooner. And just so you know, [u]YOU[/u] were the one who first cracked our mutual alliance with your incompetence during Bi-Polar War, and not Pez, or anything she said or done. [/quote] It's public comments like this, pez's, Grub's, and a couple others that are the reason there was and is trouble between our alliances, not because someone dare disagree with your leaders. There was a time when things like this were discussed in private, not in public. And that you would come here to the OWF to kick and scream while simultaneously there is a real discussion going on between our alliances shows that there is no real commitment from you to actually repair the relationship. Airing dirty laundry is not the way to fix issues.

[quote name='Chaoshawk' timestamp='1347500673' post='3029507'] A little early for 12/12/12! [/quote] They are going for 10-11-12. I think.

These threads always result in such big, relevant things.

[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1345795024' post='3024808'] Hey INT, if you need some help with this bottom-feeder, you've got our number. [/quote] Get it? He's from DICK, and he's a [i]bottom[/i] feeder. Ha Ha ha ha. ha.....

[font=arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif][size=2][quote name='potato' timestamp='1345132900' post='3022438'] I don't think I ever said we weren't at fault. As I said, I'm probably biased in saying that but I do find the current opposition to be dumber than the former one. There's a reason why people like Archon and Denial (and even myself if I may be as bold as to put myself up in that list alongside them) have pretty much left the OWF. Trolls (from both sides) are running the place and I have my hand in it since I am one of the biggest culprits around here. What I am saying is political discourse is dead these days. But if you really want it to come back, both sides will have to work hand in hand (lol :sissies:). And I do think if it's one thing the opposition can do, it's start an intelligent discourse (see Vox to an extend). Don't let the usual dumb loudmouthes represent you, speak up if you can. Someone's got to start somewhere. And you'll see we'll respond in kind. Schatt, you know well I am long retired and have very little interest in the affairs of this world. And you know me well enough to know that if someone is worthy of respect, he'll get it from me, regardless of sides. But you can't fault me for what my allies say. Contrary to popular beliefs, MK doesn't control what GOONS, Umbrella, TOP or ODN say. I certainly wouldn't mind if we did sometimes but the fact remains, we don't. [/quote] So what you are saying is that if we start up intelligent discussion, MK, GOONS, and NG will follow with more intelligent discussion? With the current status of the OWF, as well as its status for the past three years in mind, I will go ahead and disagree with you there. [quote name='Crymson' timestamp='1345144974' post='3022470'] The simple fact is that there is no other alliance that has ever had the level of power and influence that NPO had in the pre-Karma days, and there isn't likely to ever again be one during the remaining lifespan of CN. NPO was a huge alliance that possessed a large, powerful, and (mostly) very loyal group of allies. The latter quality was what allowed the NPO to act as it did. And the gradual alienation of those allies was a major factor in the NPO's eventual defeat. Whatever the case, neither MK nor any other alliance in the game has that sort of loyal sphere willing to follow them in all things. I'm sure that many find it convenient to believe that one party is responsible for all of the large-scale actions in CN that they find distasteful--your alliance, for example, blamed the occurrence of the War of the Coalition exclusively on TOP--but such is generally an insensible belief. Where this particular instance of it is concerned, MK does not wield nearly so much influence as you and others amongst MK's detractors believe. I understand that you cannot see what goes on behind the scenes in certain areas and that this naturally limits your ability to know exactly how things go down, so to speak, and this is of course the case for many others as well (Alterego amongst them). What it comes down to, as such, is whether or not you choose to believe what those who do know tell you, or if you instead choose to believe what you wish to believe regardless of what information is presented to you. I do, of course, agree that the doctrine preached by the Karma coalition during the war of that name was not borne out in reality. This is hardly surprising, given that it was PR-based propaganda and given the nature of CN. That said, the list of alliances in the Karma coalition that did not abide by said doctrine is very long. Of course--as noted--it's always tempting to simplify such affairs down to one party in order to provide a defined focus. [/quote] You will be hard-pressed to find anyone in Polaris who blames the War of the Coalition exclusively on TOP. Pacifica, MCXA (later TSO), and VE all took a lovely part of that blame. Regardless, my point stands, as the instability of MK's sphere is no reason why it could not have stopped any of the things I listed from occurring. The argument that you are making I cannot dispute with facts so I will make no attempt to. However in regards to the original argument I made in counter to kwell's post, what you have said does not change anything.[/size][/font] [quote name='Lord Fingolfin' timestamp='1345146053' post='3022480'] Good examples, but I think if anything though they are a testament to a job well done. At least in my opinion it is the responsibility of those with power to act with it and cause wars and drama around here. Would you really prefer a benevolent hegemon, enforcing peace throughout the land, completely reasonable and fair, never prosecuting a grudge or political agenda. A true Pax Pacifica where we all grew our nations in peace and sang kumbaya? Of course not, you need someone to play the villain. Side note though, whatever happened to Assarax? Haven't heard that name in years, such a nice chap. [/quote] I am not going to disagree with you because again you are correct. But once again this is not the argument that I made. kwell insisted that MK did the world a service, that now there are no such thing as reps, as wars for bad reasons, as injustice. I pointed out that he was absolutely incorrect. I am not positive but I think Assarax departed our world.

[font=arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif][size=2][quote name='kwell' timestamp='1345088618' post='3022334'] I remember the red senate. I remember a team that was dominated by a single alliance willing to inflict punishment on anyone who dared start an alliance or raid a nation on their color. I remember PZI and Eternal ZI. I remember watching FAN burn for 2 years. I remember reps. NPO deserved to be burned. NPO has done it's time, so to speak, however we should be wary of their past crimes much like a convicted felon. [/quote] I remember when MK took gargantuan reps from TOP. I remember when bros spied on the alliances he ran websites for. I remember the ghostbust of Kait and Hoo. I remember when they trolled Assarax. I remember the support of alliance-level tech raids. I remember the use of the same CB that started the Karma War. I remember when they accepted someone on a ZI list so that they could start a war. I remember when they declared on Pacifica without reason. I remember when they trolled a good friend of mine into deletion. I remember the support of OOC attacks. I remember the wars declared for no reason. I remember the enormous reps levied on alliances that were merely defending themselves. I remember the undying support of the recklessness of their allies. [/size][/font] I remember when MK promised to create a brave new world, then turned around and became worse than NPO. In what way is this world better than the one Pacifica ruled?

[quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1344730702' post='3020959'] Actually, the treaty has always included both a cancellation and an amendment clause (referred to in the OP). I'm not sure how that myth got started, but it really became widespread even though it was never the case. [/quote] Really? I could have sworn that I saw the original treaty and it did not include that clause. In any case good luck to you both.

Is that the last uncancelable treaty? Can we stop pretending those are a good idea?

o/ Farkistan This has been a long time coming.

[quote name='Jake Liebenow' timestamp='1344359227' post='3019582'] Everyone posting in this topic after page 4 is dead wrong, their posts are bad, and they should feel bad. Just, seriously. Holy geez. Drop it. [/quote] Does that include you? [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/PsyduckEmot.gif[/img]

[quote name='Baltus' timestamp='1342796154' post='3012583'] Mergers are good for everyone. Thus everyone should merge. Also, 2000 pages. [/quote] Merger is good for everyone.

[quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1342238116' post='3009959'] The problem with this strategy, as Brehon has screamed repeatedly, is that a) it makes you more likely to be the target again, because you did not get properly rolled. Also, it gives you a stigma that is hard to escape, a la Sparta who is doing the same thing this war that they did last war. [/quote] Correct. I am just saying there is a reason to their madness. [quote name='Canik' timestamp='1342239769' post='3009979'] So, our 81 million vs their 22 million currently. A small sacrifice for the greater strategy? xD Another interesting stat: We have more in NS in peace mode than they do in war mode. (Hint: This strategy isn't working. Go figure.) [/quote] No strategy is going to 'work'. All they can do is try and limit the damage they take and prepare for next war.

Interesting, but not altogether that surprising. If they're going to lose anyway, they may as well try and 1. inflict as much damage for as long as possible and 2. try and take as little damage as possible.

[img]http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/23419649.jpg[/img] Zoot.

New Jersey is a terrible place.

[quote name='SirWilliam' timestamp='1341791228' post='3006923'] I lead GOONS. Sardonic, however, is our figurehead. [/quote] What's GOONS? Is that similar to GONs?

I find it absolutely ridiculous and an insult to the already low collective intelligence of this community that this thread has reached [i]24 pages[/i].