Jump to content

White Chocolate

Members
  • Posts

    2,203
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by White Chocolate

  1. None of the RFI nations last war turned around and attacked their allies. That’s more than can be said for the nation TheCastle. Speaking of turning around in the middle of a war, it’s good to see that Polar respects ODN enough that Polar waited until AFTER the conflict to drop their treaty with ODN. RFI might not be perfect as a bloc, but I am 100% confident that no member of RFI would ever switch sides in the middle of a war.
  2. I’ll take that as confirmation that you recognize that you were embarrassing.
  3. LOL. Too much of an advantage to Polar and FL.
  4. I was talking to and about firingline. I am over FTW. We had fun beating on each other. Now we’re done. Thank you for the dance.
  5. Thank you, Santa jerdge. ------------------------------- Hail peace.
  6. What I was embarrassed by was having you in an allied alliance. Thank admin that is no longer the case.
  7. Because they are friends. To be fair, I get that some people within FTW might have a hard time understanding the difference.
  8. You all did NOT just add another "terrible" to the Terrible "Terrible Peace War"! Seriously! When is this madness going to stop?
  9. LOLRFL. Well, okay - I mean no one from your side could take peace early (and certainly not do what Polar has done to our side) without a !@#$load of verbal abuse, name calling, !@#$%*ing and harassment generally, both on the OWF and on discord from you all.
  10. We tried. They said no - we want "white peace" for everyone at the same time instead. It is what it is. I'm glad to see you taking part in the discussion on the OWF. I know, it can be a pain. Just because NPO could 100% rightfully have a desire to punish Polaris, that does not mean that it was ever discussed. I get why you all would think that it was. Had one of YOUR allies at the start of the war decided not only leave early but then also turned around and attack a former ally, no doubt you all would want to see that alliance punished. That goes against everything you all are claiming to value after all. And "having a mind of their own" - LOL - that's what it's called, is it. Perhaps some of the alliances fighting on your side should "have a mind of their own." Any objections? I thought so. And it's too bad that it was not, imo. The first part of the above I agree. There are plenty of options between perpetual war or white peace. Your coalition just does not want to accept any of them. That's your right - but it's your choice. Gee - I wonder which alliances showed CLAWS the benefits of using peace mode in a strategic fashion. The comment below is so so very true Indeed. Whenever the side one is one does anything, it's expertly planned and brilliant. If the opposite side from yours does the same thing, it's total BS - how could anyone do such a thing?!
  11. Careful. If you continue to insult both CLAWS and Non Grata with such slander, the only issue that will hold up peace will be in which alliance dungeon you will sit, ours or Non Grata’s.
  12. This is the most caustic comment I’ve seen on the OWF. Very impressive show of hypocrisy.
  13. This wins the award for the most irrelevant statistic I have seen on Planet Bob to date. That’s damn good, considering Bob loves numbers.
  14. It’s “strategic” in the same way FTW is doing it. Or , as we have been informed by FTW people, does NG not know how to war? 😛
  15. You know NATO and FTW used as a CB for the start of this war something DBDC posted in 2020, right? I think we can wait a few months. LOL!
  16. May we have this dance, MHA?
  17. FAN? Oh, you mean the Federation of Armed Nations! The alliance that has three active wars right now and 0.76% aid slot usage. No. I do not remember that. Lander Clan did not even exist until 2008. I had to go check the wiki. Next time you try and make a threat old man, remember that the year is 2022. A reference to something that happened 15 years ago may not have the effect now that it did in - oh, 2010.
  18. It made “strategic” sense in the beginning of the war. The war is over three months old at this point. If you still believe it is worth having half your people in peace mode all the time, go for it. My initial point was the irony of saying that your side is “for” activity while the majority of your nations are sitting in peace mode. Strategic or not, that’s not promoting activity.
×
×
  • Create New...