ROMMELHSQ

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1295951722' post='2599806'] When you couldn’t trap in NPO with the same move used by them in the Karma war, a move they were hammered for by you then you just did what TOP did against you in the Bi-Polar war in a move you hammered them for. I know being on top you dont care about opinions or comical levels of hypocrisy. I’m interested to know TOPs take on this move. The OP clearly thinks there is a major difference between the two citing TOPs attack as “deplorable” and “not when against a foe of strength” amongst his comments to justify this attack [b]So what say you TOP, happy with your new allies move after what dhey did to you only months ago?[/b] [/quote] It was us doing it to them. And honestly, unless there is some back-stabbing. I'm personally quite satisfied...it just show how much us and MK are similar...with this, more than ever!!

[quote name='AlmightyGrub' timestamp='1295939889' post='2599391'] You played the last card ever, you now have nothing else. Gives everyone else a clear picture of where you want to take this. There is no incentive for anyone to play any card, most have simply now given up on anything ever being meaningful again. Enjoy ruling a scorched planet? GPA wins. Congratulations for 4 years of doing nothing being rewarded. Or do they die too in your master plan for social evolution? [/quote] You have yourself to thank for making it go that way.

We glad we teached you a lesson MK Have fun killing NPO.

For the golden hall.

Congrats to BAPS and DR

o/ Argent Have fun and don't forget my share of the fur!

[quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1295671584' post='2590856'] This is some inane crap right here. much along the lines of TOP being pissed cuz TOP was stupid enough to pre-emptively DOW on MK instead of just DoWing on all of CnG minus MK (who was Polaris's ally) and then TOP wonders why Polaris honored the treaty with MK... seriously, this is some pretty dumb friggin stuff. [/quote] You know, one could swallow such BS coming from STA....but now using it for NpO??

I guess VE and their allies shouldn't worry about recieving much damage if NpO is planning to give the same damage they did in WotC.

[quote name='Jinnai' timestamp='1295325483' post='2580052'] It's still within grasp. All you have to do is just lose 6 members. [/quote] They can start by giving SG and Yev back

[quote name='PMoses' timestamp='1295322022' post='2579841'] Ummm, know the history there buddy. Its no secret TOP rides out the best while they can, and when the numbers point against them they run.. Crymson has openly said he masterminded the collapse of the OoO, and TOP vowed to never leave Q hanging, and when the time came to stand up for something.. they ran to the other side, and didn't even declare on NPO till it was Clear Pacifica was finished. Then TOP went on to preach about how they felt NPO having FAN in a Permawar was so wrong.. Now there members are demanding a forced disbandment or perma war on the OWF.. [/quote] wait....we declared on NPO in karma war??

[quote name='Spaarlaamp' timestamp='1295317440' post='2579444'] This might actually be fun. [img]http://i.imgur.com/ONANz.png[/img] 9.5k infra nation. [/quote] reminds me of when they had months to prepare their selves for WotC and their MoD had 8m $$ or less.

[quote name='Saber' timestamp='1295316148' post='2579322'] BiPolar this! [/quote] I laughed

I hate you VE....I really do

[quote name='Natan' timestamp='1295115988' post='2576180'] A bold shot in the dark [/quote] It is daylight, but he is just blind

3 legs seem to be more than enough.

[quote name='Locke' timestamp='1295029603' post='2575239'] That's not what you (not you [i]personally[/i], mind you) said back then. Came more to the tune of "what? We actually kind of sort of liked you guys." [/quote] MK's Propaganda is known to be believed by fools...which is not a small percentage here

For everyone complaining....for the love of admin, think of the children!!!

[quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1294934439' post='2574097'] And as such, my take would be (as if you cared) that in the best military category it was a coin toss between TOP and Umb and I think TOP had to win as they had an edge in sense that they showed their might in action while Umb's still remains just a potential. [/quote] I would say MK instead of Umb....but honestly...what a great [i]academy[/i] this was...we got one vote only lol

[quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1294816267' post='2572920'] I did I just dont want to see this changed to suit you and your posse because you dont want to follow rules in place years. A leader coming out and whining like a commoner is far funnier. I dont think TOP did it when they were below the 200 mark they had some self respect. They accepted the natural order and did some recruiting. If you or any of the other people unable or unwilling to get/keep a sanction as it has always been then you dont deserve it. Membership level is important, in a time where people are trying to get numbers into CN rewarding lazy recruiting nations by waiving the member requirement for sanction status because of the butt hurt of those who cant manage it is a mistake. [/quote] We didn't recruit. [quote name='Sal Paradise' timestamp='1294814221' post='2572857'] Alliances are dismissive of the sanction when they're on the verge of losing it. [/quote] nah....we only wanted the sanction to get our flag in...nothing else. We hated everything else that came with it. edit: regarding the OP...it is sad indeed. But not different from the past when we were 4th or 5th biggest in score and couldn't get our flag in. Now it is the same, but opposite ^^

MK solidifying their position near The Core!!! Congrats guys

edit: nm

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1294363314' post='2566484'] My thoughts exactly. Sadly you're not popular enough, and people tend to look more at the last half of the year when doing these awards [/quote] Some people read the poll question as: "What is your (friends) alliance?")

Bah... Treatying MK isnt enough for entering the Core Hey GOONS, treaty please?

Now these stats I like [img]http://ordoparadox.com/top/public/style_emoticons/default/awesomeTOP2.png[/img]

[quote name='Thorgrum' timestamp='1293749373' post='2558635'] Really, if one wants others to move beyond past "mistakes", one has to, at least on the surface, adopt some modicum of humility. I personally enjoy consistancy, thats why reading Crymson's post was baffling. At least TOP survived, gramlins is a hollow shell of its former self that must be particularly gratifying eh rommel? [/quote] Vladimir said what I wanted to say well