Jump to content

foxfire99

Members
  • Posts

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by foxfire99

  1. Acrobatics or creative chaining? It was a direct MDP! It doesn't get any more straightforward than that. You're wrong, anyone who claims otherwise is oblivious or a lair. Or has a slightly different perspective or philosophy than me.
  2. Are you really making the argument, in the middle of the most even war in recent memory, that the world is not multi-polar? With your candidate for single ruling power being a mash-up of four different blocs with little membership overlap, one of which can't decide which side to fight on? Interesting theory.
  3. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1296934399' post='2620799'] If I was joking I would say: [i]Did you hear the one about 2 different blocs who manufactured 2 seperate CBs out of thin air 7 days apart then called it the same war. [/i] "shall refrain from re-entering the NpO-VE conflict opposite of FOK, [b]or any wars resulting from it[/b]" Yes Im serious. If you can claim 2 unrelated wars with 2 seperate groups of alliances started for 2 different reasons 7 days apart are the same war, then you can just claim any future war is a result of this war. [/quote] If you read the Doomhouse Dow you would realize how silly this sounds.
  4. Baring an actual announcement somewhere in there that I missed, I think [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=97252&st=1280"]this[/url] is the thread you were looking for.
  5. [quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1296879023' post='2619835'] not really. fact is TOP/co and Polaris held no treaties. fact is Polaris/MK held a treaty. fact is TOP/co hit MK/CnG. fact is MK asked Polaris to uphold the treaty. fact is Polaris upheld the treaty. yes, it was pretty !@#$%* that Grub went back on his word to TOP/co, but to not go back on his word would meant not honoring a treaty. Grub screwed himself and Polaris cuz either way he went, he broke his word to someone. unfortunately for TOP/co, he chose to break a handshake with alliances that were traditionally unfriendly with Polaris versus a written document with supposed friends. unfortunately for Polaris; those same friends, the ones who Polaris threw away their entire political capital and much of their NS, decided to turn around and !@#$ on them hardcore. Not only did MK throw Polaris away, MK signed a treaty with TOP and then went about allowing them to be destroyed after Polaris risked everything to ensure MK was not destroyed. i think Polaris would have gone through with allowing MK to be destroyed had they known that MK would turn around and do this to Polaris. so, you can try to state i am not being objective, but i am far more objective than you, or TOP, or MK or many others. i can recognize the crap that Polaris has done but i can also see the crap that is done to them. i still find it amusing that TOP was stupid enough to think they could hit a Polar ally without consequence. Honestly, ya'll should have smelled a trap when Grub agreed to allow ya'll to hit MK/CnG. ya'll should have hit all of CnG except MK forcing MK to declare on ya'll and thus nullifying the Polaris treaty. and the fact that none of ya'll get that is ridiculous. ya'll screwed up huge by hitting MK. [/quote] You make the assumption that C&G would have lost the war if Polar hadn't sold out TOP, which I'm not sure is completely true, but that situation is rather closed to experimentation, so I won't argue that. And saying "You should never have trusted them in the first place" is unlikely to make TOP feel any better about the situation. And for the love of Admin, please look up and learn some basic spelling and grammar rules.
  6. [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1296709335' post='2617096'] wen u cnt think of an gud argument, mock spellinz & grandma, wel dun [/quote] They gave you perfectly logical reasons for their actions, and you just stuck your fingers in your ears and shouted "desperation! Hypocrisy!" and so yes, now it is time to mock you spelling. Or you could just briefly proofread your posts.
  7. Man, if there were artillery in CN, TPF and CoJ would be formidable indeed.
  8. [quote name='mompson' timestamp='1296619777' post='2615586'] You have no room to talk. You didn't have the guts to declare without 4 puppets to help you. And Polaris has a nasty habit of doing stuff people don't expect don't you think? Also, don't worry, it won't take long. [/quote] Or we had more brains than to attack a significantly larger alliance without backup. And generally you want the people who don't expect you to start beating on them to be your enemies
  9. They denote faceless Pacifican minions.
  10. [quote name='saxasm' timestamp='1296337481' post='2609931'] Modified version and in sig format: [img]http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3238/33w8769.jpg[/img] [/quote] You do realize that the chart means absolutely nothing if you take the numbers and axis off?
  11. Recovering or conserving strength in Peace mode, no. Talking crap from PM? You pretty much leave yourself open to mockery.
  12. [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1296255643' post='2608040'] Considering the CB was manufactured, [/quote] This is clearly not true, but has been covered ad nauseum, so I will leave you to your delusions. [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1296255643' post='2608040'] KoH are a protectorate of Polar, so not uninvolved. Just sayin [/quote] True, and they are well within their rights to launch a counter against MN, but once they do, it activates our protectorate and we are at war with them in all but name from then on. The declaration just named it.
  13. [img]http://i688.photobucket.com/albums/vv247/phoxfire99/Cower.jpg[/img]
  14. [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1296237509' post='2607610'] Your protectorate entered an agressive war. Though, VE defending that isn't a supprise, like farther like son [/quote] Actually, MN was assisting us in a provoked war with Polar, and even if they had randomly attack some uninvolved alliance out of nowhere, counters against them are still offensive wars, activating any treaty worth mentioning. Also, we are their farther?
  15. Great read. I have always been a fan of the alternate history genre.
  16. [quote name='mhawk' timestamp='1296102614' post='2604197'] Once again we stand on the edge of the abyss. [/quote] Once again. I've pretty much stopped feeling sorry for you.
  17. [quote name='Masterof9puppets' timestamp='1296102883' post='2604282'] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/j9QYY.jpg[/IMG] [/quote] I love this one. I can't even say why, but I laughed.
  18. When you start quoting back to the beginning, it's time to pack it up and call it a thread, imho.
  19. [quote name='Thrash' timestamp='1295707173' post='2591863'] Get 'em STA. Wipe that arrogance away. [/quote] There is no arrogance. Keep reading. Godspeed brothers o/
×
×
  • Create New...