Karl Martin Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Since I shall be in both an open and closed war because of Zoot, does this mean I can raise separate troops for the open conflict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 No, your total soldier count must be split between the two. Whatever is fighting Dotcom, stays in Wallonia and wont be allowed in our war. Whatevers left, is what you have to fight me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Martin Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 One difference: one closed RP that is not based on IG status, and one open RP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AironthFlamewing Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Karl thats BS and would if it was allowed create such a precedent as to irreparably damage CNRP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 But your war in Wallonia is canon. Doesnt matter if its closed or not Karl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Martin Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Another thing to settle: Since the person sending the letter relating to nuking england has no relationship to Burgundholmr (check the link below), the thing about the letter being from Burgundholmr cannot be valid. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=84729&view=findpost&p=2296851 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Stop trying to weasel out of this. You made a bad IC move, you're paying the price. Man up and take your lickings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Martin Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 That is where people underestimate me: I never make a move. It is others twising what I have done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoot Zoot Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 [quote name='Karl Martin' timestamp='1286760962' post='2480832'] Another thing to settle: Since the person sending the letter relating to nuking england has no relationship to Burgundholmr (check the link below), the thing about the letter being from Burgundholmr cannot be valid. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=84729&view=findpost&p=2296851 [/quote] It is Valid, your catboy was not recognised so it was traced back to Burgundholmr. Regardless of your arguments, your attack on London is CB enough. There is no way around the kick in the vagina your about to get dude. Sorry. For confirmation a GM ruling on this would be good. We have a war to RP ICly, nevermind OOCly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted October 11, 2010 Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 Requesting spy rolls for KC and Mykep. The first two are for shutting down their military communications. The second set (to be done after midnight), is to shut down civilian communication. Roleplay has already been done laying the groundwork for my hackers attempting to break into their systems. Screenies. [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v650/That_Bum/MykepSpy.png[/img] [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v650/That_Bum/KCspy.png[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted October 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2010 As always, 1-70 and 1-90 is a success. [img]http://img806.imageshack.us/img806/9371/1222am.png[/img] Four successes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1286960472' post='2483435'] Cochin is complaining because I removed MY War Memorial from HIS country. I'd like a ruling on this. [/quote] Matter of fact, so would I. So quoted it in this thread for the GMs to muse upon. Also here is the pertaining thread. [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=93320"][CNRP+T] Dimensional Rift. The Birth of George Intializing thread of the CNRPT dimension[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 My argument is that if I no longer support him having my memorial he can no longer sustain it within his country, because it was my nation supporting it IG via my cultists, which he no longer has. He has his own memorial, he can use it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='Maelstrom Vortex' timestamp='1286961229' post='2483444'] My argument is that if I no longer support him having my memorial he can no longer sustain it within his country, because it was my nation supporting it IG via my cultists, which he no longer has. He has his own memorial, he can use it now. [/quote] The building exists on my territory. It is no longer his wonder ever since the territory became mine. It may not be a wonder, but it is still a structure in my nation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 You can't just revert a wonder to a structure. That's like saying.. the Eifel Tower.. Great Wall of China.. or numerous other icons become "just structures" because they are taken over by someone else. They are pegged to the cultural identity of the creators. The creators are no longer there to sustain it. Like the Great wall, it's gonna crumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Again I leave it to the Gms to decide whether Mael has any right to RP what happens in my land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 You don't really get any benefit out of having a war memorial in CNRP, not sure why you guys are harping about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 [quote name='Tidy Bowl Man' timestamp='1286963536' post='2483459'] You don't really get any benefit out of having a war memorial in CNRP, not sure why you guys are harping about it. [/quote] Precisely. His war memorial ceases to be his thing to RP once I have the territory. Then it becomes just a structure under my control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 It's not so much that it is his war memorial or yours, but more so the fact that they don't do bupkis for you anyway. Just go build another damn war memorial. If it was an SDI or a MP I'd understand, but a war memorial? Seriously Mael, this love in you are having with Cochy is getting a little weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of cochin Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 I have my own War Memorial in Cochin City, I dont need another memorial, however Mael is not permitted to RP anything happening in my territory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Fine fine.. Cochin.. if it means that much to you. Keep it. Not that it matters any longer, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Well yeah... though there is that old saying of giving the customer exactly what the want. You did just finger his cultists for the nuclear attack. Why not take it the next step further with an expression of rage from your kingdom loving population and their sledge hammers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 (edited) You mean actually let me fulfill one of my prophecies? LOL. He'd rather stick his thumb in my eye I'm afraid. Edited October 13, 2010 by Maelstrom Vortex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Minister Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Why would a GM need to rule on a CNRP-T thread anyways? This seems a little bit out of my jurisdiction, even if i cared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted October 13, 2010 Report Share Posted October 13, 2010 Eh, he was upset at the bob part of the thread that was still in CNRP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts