Andover Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 (edited) [center] [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20071214115305/cybernations/images/0/0c/ROKINIT2.PNG[/img] [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100228004303/cybernations/images/3/37/ERAFlag.jpg[/img] [/center] First off Thank you to Ragnablok for the wonderful protection, you guys are awesome. However time has come for ERA to move forward and we must leave Ragnablok Next announcement: TSP/ERA MDoAP [center] "The Equally Dark MDoAP" [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100507132946/cybernations/images/thumb/2/21/Flag_of_the_Shadow_Proclamation.svg/200px-Flag_of_the_Shadow_Proclamation.svg.png[/img] [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100228004303/cybernations/images/3/37/ERAFlag.jpg[/img] [/center] [quote] Article 1: Sovereignty Both Alliance's recognize each-other and will be ran by its own government. Article 2: Mutual Defense Both alliances must declare war to defend the other from a foreign aggressor Article 3: Optional Aggression Either alliance may assist the other optionally in an aggressive war. Article 4: Intelligence If intelligence of a threat or other important information pertaining to the other alliance is discovered it must be divulged. Article 5: Aid The 2 Alliances may provide aid to the other during times of war and peace. Article 6: Termination May be Terminated with 72 hours grace by either government via proper procedure of that government as per their charter. Article 7: Exception Article 6 may be negated if either alliance declares war on a alliance with a MDP or higher level treaty with the other alliance in this MDoAP. [/quote] Signed for Equal Rights Alliance, Andover, President Signed for The Shadow Proclamation, [img]http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii55/LT_imageserver/Userbar-TSP.png[/img] JDorian, Triumvir Grant, Triumvir Kaplechistan, Triumvir Shadeslayers, Lord of Foreign Affairs Bobogoobo, Lord of Defense Magister, Lord of Internal Affairs Magister, Lord of Recruitment and Education Bobogoobo, Lord of Finance Edited May 10, 2010 by Andover Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewolfe2015 Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 You have 6 nations and less than 100,000 strength... Who are TSP? You have no signatures... Didn't you just sign into Ragnablok? Wrong in so many ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andover Posted May 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 TSP is the reformed alliance of ADI basically, they still carry most of ADI's treatys. The sigs are now added. Van Hoo made a very valid point in IRC that got me thinking and ultimately lead to this decision. 16:09 VanHooIII[RoK] If you have a military treaty with an alliance, you don't really need a protectorate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 TSP = The Shadow Proclamation if i presume correctly? kind of young to be leaving your protectorate status arent you? either way best of luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 Essentially, ERA used RoK for protection because TSP was taking too long to sign off on a MDoAP. ERA were made aware [b]before[/b] signing with us that we don't allow protectorates to sign MDoAPs. [quote][14:03] <Andover[ERA]> u around? [14:04] <VanHooIII[RoK]> Hey [14:05] <Andover[ERA]> Would RoK be ok with ERA signing a MDoAP with TSP? [14:05] <VanHooIII[RoK]> A MDoAP? [14:05] <VanHooIII[RoK]> No ... :/ [14:10] <VanHooIII[RoK]> If you have a military treaty with an alliance, you don't really need a protectorate [14:10] <VanHooIII[RoK]> We typically only allow a PIAT or ODP until you're on yuor own [14:10] <VanHooIII[RoK]> your* [14:26] <Andover[ERA]> hey [14:26] <VanHooIII[RoK]> Hey [14:26] <Andover[ERA]> so your point you stated got me thinking, you are correct [14:27] <Andover[ERA]> if ERA has a MDoAP we wouldnt really need a protectorate [14:27] <Andover[ERA]> ERA is gonna withdraw from the blok 11[14:27] <VanHooIII[RoK]> I already know, and this was all poorly handled by you guys [14:28] <Andover[ERA]> I know, under the circumstances I did what I had to do as the leader 11[14:28] <VanHooIII[RoK]> No, you used RoK [14:29] <Andover[ERA]> if you feel that way then I guess I can say now its even for you guys Using Warbuck and ADI 11[14:29] <VanHooIII[RoK]> Um, excuse me? 11[14:29] <VanHooIII[RoK]> Did you just really say that? 11[14:29] <VanHooIII[RoK]> I have some advice for you ... 11[14:29] <VanHooIII[RoK]> Say thank you for protecting us, go post your announcement, and walk away [14:30] <Andover[ERA]> am 11[14:30] <VanHooIII[RoK]> Good idea Session Close: Mon May 10 14:38:13 2010[/quote] Best of luck to ERA and TSP. You'll both need it with a guy like Andover at the helm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dauntless Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 (edited) Yes, Andover, you have clearly outlined the duty of a leader. Start drama with alliances you wouldn't be able to handle even if your alliance wasn't newly formed. Well done. I'd wish you the best of luck in the future, but your future is looking pretty bleak with you at the helm. Edited May 10, 2010 by Dauntless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix von Agnu Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 I think you took the wrong lesson away from Hoo's quote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 while it's one thing to want to continue a friendship, burning bridges with other alliances is not usually the best idea. you should've atleast waited until you reached 350k NS minimum to break off and on good terms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memoryproblems Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 I can't say I have anything bad to say about an alliance distancing itself from Ragnarok. Good luck ERA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 [quote name='memoryproblems' date='10 May 2010 - 03:07 PM' timestamp='1273529248' post='2293967'] I can't say I have anything bad to say about an alliance distancing itself from Ragnarok. Good luck ERA. [/quote] I can't say I have anything good to say about memoryproblems. I guess we're both content. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 It's amazing how some micro alliance leaders are competent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 That flag is exceptionally ugly. The name of the treaty is exceptionally good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 (edited) Tends to happen with alliances that part from RoK. Drama starts to happen. Happened with TOOL last year this time, then ADI, now happening with ERA - to a much lesser extent, lol. Can't say I support this either way, even if I do disagree with RoK. Your alliance is so tiny, you should probably have signed a protectorate with an alliance that's willing to let you sign the MDoAP with TSP, or just get a protectorate with TSP. Edited May 10, 2010 by R3nowned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dauntless Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 Ah yes, ERA using Rok to protect their members until they could secure a treaty with another alliance is Rok's fault for drama ensuing? I think what really tends to happen is people not liking the fact they have to pay for their stupidity and that Rok doesn't back down from being messed with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hefe Posted May 10, 2010 Report Share Posted May 10, 2010 [quote name='R3nowned' date='10 May 2010 - 05:56 PM' timestamp='1273532201' post='2294045'] Tends to happen with alliances that part from RoK. Drama starts to happen. Happened with TOOL last year this time, then ADI, now happening with ERA - to a much lesser extent, lol. [/quote] While I wasn't in RoK for the TOOL treaty, I can say that the ADI drama was very much with HOW ADI went its separate ways with RoK. If ERA leaving the Blok in this fashion even ranks on your drama meter then you might want to get it re-calibrated. When the protectorate was announced, I thought "Sweet, another protectorate." Now that they've left (all things considered) the only emotion I can dredge up is a resounding "Meh." Good luck ERA - from the logs I've seen you're gonna need it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 (edited) [quote name='El Hefe' date='11 May 2010 - 10:40 AM' timestamp='1273534833' post='2294103'] While I wasn't in RoK for the TOOL treaty, I can say that the ADI drama was very much with HOW ADI went its separate ways with RoK. If ERA leaving the Blok in this fashion even ranks on your drama meter then you might want to get it re-calibrated. When the protectorate was announced, I thought "Sweet, another protectorate." Now that they've left (all things considered) the only emotion I can dredge up is a resounding "Meh." Good luck ERA - from the logs I've seen you're gonna need it. [/quote] We're desperately needing drama from places other than Gramlins lol and the "drama" is based on the comments of your fellow alliance mates above. The TOOL treaty thing is long past, and it should stay that way. Pretty much, I think both sides developed an enmity and grudge against each other after that. In the active body of the membership at any rate, but past is past. Edited May 11, 2010 by R3nowned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 I'm rather neutral in my opinion of Ragnarok, and considering that our allies often oppose each other, I don't often say anything nice about them. But there's no doubt that Ragnablok is a great protectorate system and well tended to by Rok. You should have stayed with them a longer until you were wiser and stronger, or at least discussed your intentions with them [b]before[/b] making the decision. Had you done so, you would have had a better, stronger, ally in Rok and, possibly, another ally in TSP, too. Now, what's done is done, so I would advise you to at least redouble your diplomatic efforts to Rok and try to work with what ever esteem they have left for you guys. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 [quote name='R3nowned' date='10 May 2010 - 05:12 PM' timestamp='1273536757' post='2294139'] We're desperately needing drama from places other than Gramlins lol and the "drama" is based on the comments of your fellow alliance mates above. The TOOL treaty thing is long past, and it should stay that way. Pretty much, I think both sides developed an enmity and grudge against each other after that. In the active body of the membership at any rate, but past is past. [/quote] I don't mean this in an insulting way, but Ragnarok doesn't really think about or discuss TOOL very much. If there is a grudge, it is one sided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesalius Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 Looks like ERA has some quality leadership there, only genius could make remarks such as Andover did. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 [quote name='Van Hoo III' date='11 May 2010 - 11:28 AM' timestamp='1273537697' post='2294162'] I don't mean this in an insulting way, but Ragnarok doesn't really think about or discuss TOOL very much. If there is a grudge, it is one sided. [/quote] At the time there was - tempers were up, and insults thrown around. As I said, past is past, and I don't think TOOL has talked about RoK... well, since the incident. This is off topic though. As I said earlier ERA, you guys should've stayed under protection for longer. If not with RoK, then with someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wabooz Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 [quote name='D34th' date='10 May 2010 - 05:36 PM' timestamp='1273530973' post='2294013'] It's amazing how some micro alliance leaders are competent. [/quote] Since when did the size of AA matter when it comes to competence? Anyhow, Good luck ERA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randalla Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 I believe it would have been acceptable to keep your treaty within the limits of what is allowed in the Ragnablok, then upgrade upon your legitimate graduation. There are ways to have your cake and eat it, too, as they say. It's very possible to graduate from the Ragnablok without any drama, while still maintaining good relations with Rok. I promise. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Perry Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 [quote name='Wabooz' date='10 May 2010 - 08:01 PM' timestamp='1273539664' post='2294209'] Since when did the size of AA matter when it comes to competence? Anyhow, Good luck ERA. [/quote] He means with how he handled his leaving RagnaBlok. Good luck, I guess. Looks like you're in for a fun ride. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lusitan Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 And Andover does not fail to deliver. Impressive, I can say I was seeing something like this coming, but not to this extent since I had no idea you were a RoK protectorate. First was the WAPA desertion in the middle of the war. Then trying to get in as mediator for the conflict you had deserted from while acting as you were the wronged party. And now this. Fantastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakim Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 Well ERA I think you could have done this in a much better way. RoK have always taken great pride, and rightly so, in their protectorate bloc, for a very good reason. They are extremely good at protecting and giving advice to young alliances. The pity in this is that you did not heed the advice or learn from your short time under their protection. RoK, what can I say...you cannot teach them all, for some have no capacity for learning. Van Hoo is wise, you should heed his advice on FA and alliance building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.