Locke Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 I still find this funny, the true reason any of this !@#$%^&* started was because the leader of FoA aka Rebel_Lead3r, failed to find FoA a protectorate before the deadline or simply ignored it (that is actually what happened.) Thus it was suggested to raid the FoA so PC, GOONS and \m/ had their ways. Now if silly rebel found a little dumb ole protectorate in time, none of this would have happened. Grub would have never declared war on \m/ if they never attacked. If he had, NpO would be in twice the worse shape it is in now for it would not have the sympathy of the CN community on its side and would not be helped by most of its allies for making a foolish DoW on \m/. Simple politics, nothing else. So.... again back to Rebel, it is his fault for being a tool and getting FoA attacked and letting it escalate (and boy thats an understatement) from there. I think it should be called the Fool's War tbh. Every mistake that could ever be made was executed perfectly. Silly rebel, you caused the next mass, global war! Hooray! Like any global war, it wasn't really about the cause. The cause is an excuse. Grub found a reason to attack \m/ and took it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime minister Johns Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 The \m/ugging gone /w\rong war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Too early still to name it, for a variety of reasons. However, that never stopped anyone from naming wars before so... If You Liked 2007 It's Back War GW IV Redux Faux Moralist War We Didn't Get to Fight Enough in 2009 War The Bored War The No C&G, No Problem War Londo Is Laughing While You Shoot Each Other War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff Webster Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) Technical Difficulties or Late DoW EDIT: Or the one Chimaera suggested. Edited January 28, 2010 by Biff Webster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acca Dacca Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 if the OWF fails again, it needs to be the nOWF war/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenzilla Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 As soon as people can pick between the Winter War and \m/oralist War, I'll put up the next poll. They're pretty close for 3rd. fyi Grub's ego war is ahead of \m/oralist war/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utracia Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 if the OWF fails again, it needs to be the nOWF war/ I prefer the Wiki War myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zessa Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 The nOWF War. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallen Fool Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) Second Unjust War Both triggered by tech raids, plus absurdly similar sides. If things end up as I think they'll end up, then the sides won't be that absurdly similar....it may well be called two different things by different people depending on who wins. I bet most of these people have no clue what the Second Patriotic War is... FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF War. Naming the war after me?I'm flattered Edit: And yes, vote Winter War people. UJW2 is lame, and so are most of the other options. Edited January 28, 2010 by Fallen_Fool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemeard Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 You people are horrible at this. I'll pick Winter War because it's the least bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Razzia Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 And it looks like The 2nd Unjust War, Unjust War 2, or w/e you wanna call it is gonna win, unless we have another round of polls now that we have all of the stupid (and excessive) names ruled out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Greenberg Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Locke, I think it's time to open round 2 and end the debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted January 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Locke, I think it's time to open round 2 and end the debate. There's three options vying for third place with 3 votes between them. As soon as one pulls ahead, I'll call it done. If it's still not clear by next update, I'll just take who's highest. But it'd be nice to see some decision if we can get one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Second Unjust War Both triggered by tech raids, plus absurdly similar sides. not at all actually. the only alliance on the same side of the UjP is \m/. maybe PC. but TPF is not on that side, MK has yet to join in, guess you could replace Genmay with Umbrella but not really. GATO, TOP, and others will most likely not end up on \m/'s side. not to mention, it was Genmay who hit BotS over tech raiding and bad diplomacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Greenberg Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 There's three options vying for third place with 3 votes between them. As soon as one pulls ahead, I'll call it done. If it's still not clear by next update, I'll just take who's highest. But it'd be nice to see some decision if we can get one. Yeah, what I meant was; Why not just put all 4 top contenders in a new poll since I doubt it is going to change much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardus Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wow. All of these options are just... well they're just awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kataklizm the Great Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Given the way it's turning out "The Treaty Web War" is appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrilobyteMan Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) Why Winter War? Is it not an OOC reference? Really, I'm never going to call it that when I'm down here in the southern hemisphere, balls boiling. Edit: I am pantsless and likely to remove my shirt. Edited January 29, 2010 by TrilobyteMan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Whatever name may be applied, it should still have Great War (insert number here) as a prefix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) At this point it's impossible to name a war "Great War X", because this one could be anything from Great War #4 through #7, depending on your opinion on the Unjust War, the War of the Coalition and the Karma War. Edited January 29, 2010 by Lord Brendan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Greenberg Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Whatever name may be applied, it should still have Great War (insert number here) as a prefix. No it shouldn't. We argue about this each time and it always ends the same. Lets just forget about the GW? stuff. If we want base this war or other wars on that, we could name a war Epic War I or Global War I. Just not Great War Whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT Jag Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) "The War of Northern Aggression" Fitting because NpO initiated, continues to be fitting because a bunch of guys from Northern Europe attacked NpO, stays fitting when STA jumped in... you get the idea Edited January 29, 2010 by JT Jag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syan Wilmont Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) Since we are in the "second" phase of the war, how about naming the first phase "Prelude to the Epic War" (\m/oralist war or whatever) and the current phase as "The Epic War"? Edited January 29, 2010 by Syan Wilmont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capitalC Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 It wasn't long ago that I was fanatically in support of the Second Unjust War. Now, with the sheer craziness of everything making this one of the crazier nights of my life, I might be inclined towards something with the word "crazy" in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eesmith4 Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 I make a motion to name it the Derp war. Derp:A simple, undefined reply when an ignorant comment or action is made. Brought to life in the South Park series, when Mr. Derp made a guest apperance at South Park Elementary as the chef for a day, followed by hitting himself in the head with a hammer and exclaiming "Derp!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts