Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 I will extremely saddened if the word "moralist" makes it anywhere near this war's name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 The Disregard Treaties, Acquire Moral Outrage war. The "Corp's solution doesn't stroke Grub's ego enough" war. The Children's Crusade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 There is already a war by that name: http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/Moral_War We can rename that one. I'm likewise a fan of the Moral War. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acca Dacca Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 I love this for reasons completely unrelated to this war. WHO DAT SAY DEY GONNA WIN DIS WAR? OOC: was aiming for relation to that Though... Vikings Fan. IC: "Iced Out Bling" War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Bipolar war Do want. That sums the war up perfectly from my perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Also, we're not going to go around renaming my wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King DrunkWino Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 OOC: was aiming for relation to that Though... Vikings Fan. IC: "Iced Out Bling" War I've already decreed to my nation that the people of Bourbon shall spend the next two weeks painting their bodies black and gold and they must spend four hours a day streaking. /I didn't want to be the only one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 (edited) Sorry Vilien but your micro alliance fighting some random rogue doesn't really count as a war in my book. And it certainly isn't a war that deserves its own name. IMO if a war is comprised of less than 10% of the planet's total strength, it isn't significant enough to deserve a name, and should simply be referred to by the names of the combatants (TMF-Attica War). Edited January 26, 2010 by Lord Brendan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 The 2nd Moral War would be nice. Just to confuse the entire game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Xander the Only Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 The Second Unjust War seems to fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 (edited) Sorry Vilien but your micro alliance fighting some random rogue doesn't really count as a war in my book. And it certainly isn't a war that deserves its own name. IMO if a war is comprised of less than 10% of the planet's total strength, it isn't significant enough to deserve a name, and should simply be referred to by the names of the combatants (TMF-Attica War). Thanks for your opinion, arbiter of all things wiki. Edited January 26, 2010 by Vilien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R&R-Viking Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 It's GWVI or GWVII, something like that. I lost count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Andrew Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 The Nonsense War. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Thanks for your opinion, arbiter of all things wiki. I wasn't speaking about the wiki, I meant in general. Nobody would know what you meant if you ever referred to "the Moral War". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael von Prussia Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Thanks for your opinion, arbiter of all things wiki. That's actually my job, but you already know that my opinion on the matter is virtually the same as Lord Brendan's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 (edited) I wasn't speaking about the wiki, I meant in general. Nobody would know what you meant if you ever referred to "the Moral War". Just like no one would have any idea what the Eight Minute War is. There are an infinite number of potential war names, your not being able to falsely label this as a war about morality isn't going to harm any innocent wiki browsers. That's actually my job, but you already know that my opinion on the matter is virtually the same as Lord Brendan's The last time I checked a wiki is not analogous to an autocracy. Edited January 26, 2010 by Vilien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael von Prussia Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 The last time I checked a wiki is not analogous to an autocracy. Arbiter: Noun A person appointed, or chosen, by parties to determine a controversy between them; an arbitrator. Funny, that sounds exactly like a wiki administrator's job description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Arbiter: Noun A person appointed, or chosen, by parties to determine a controversy between them; an arbitrator. Funny, that sounds exactly like a wiki administrator's job description. Communal consensus determines the wiki's standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael von Prussia Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 (edited) Communal consensus determines the wiki's standards. Indeed. When a policy is needed, there are votes. Interpretation of those standards is up to the administrators. Also, currently both Brendan and I agree on the matter. That's more consensus right there than just you. That said, I still like Winter War more than Moral War anyway. Edited January 26, 2010 by Michael von Prussia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Indeed. When a policy is needed, there are votes. Interpretation of those standards is up to the administrators. Also, currently both Brendan and I agree on the matter. That's more consensus right there than just you. That said, I still like Winter War more than Moral War anyway. Glad that you agree on leaving my war page alone. That's all I needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Communal consensus determines the wiki's standards. I'm no expert on the wiki, but it looks as if you created and named that page yourself. The fact that nobody cared enough to contradict you doesn't make it a consensus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusty Juggler Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 The friend of my friend is my enemy war? Seems to be common for people involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilien Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 I'm no expert on the wiki, but it looks as if you created and named that page yourself. The fact that nobody cared enough to contradict you doesn't make it a consensus. You've shown yourself not to be an expert on the wiki by not understanding how to look at the History page. Feel free to try again when you demonstrate sufficient understanding of the topic at hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktarthan Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 (edited) Along a similar vein of "The Second Unjust War": The Unjustified War. Edit: I am not only referring to the initial CB, but there have been some contended declarations on both sides. Not attempting to be bias. Edited January 26, 2010 by ktarthan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 You've shown yourself not to be an expert on the wiki by not understanding how to look at the History page. Feel free to try again when you demonstrate sufficient understanding of the topic at hand. Actually that's exactly what I did. 23:29, November 14, 2009 Vilien (Talk | contribs) (1,896 bytes) (Page Creation) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts